SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Validity and reliability study of the postpartum self evaluation questionnaire

Postpartum kendini değerlendirme ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması

Derya Kerime TAŞÇI
Samiye METE
Pages
20–29
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The test-retest reliability coefficient that added all of the tool's items was found to be at a high level (r=0.87).As a result of this study, Postpartum Self Evaluation Questionnaire is validity and reability for Turkish society.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Validity and Reliability Study of thePostpartum Self Evaluation QuestionnaireThis research was conducted to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Postpartum Self Evaluation Questionnaire which was developed to evaluate the adaptation of women in the early period following childbirth.The research population consisted of a total of 420 women who lived in Denizli province center, were between the 3rd day and the 6th week postpartum, were between 20-38 years of age, knew how to read and write and knew Turkish, had delivered their child vaginally, lived with their husbands, who did not have and whose infant did not have any physical or psychological illness or disability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After the tool was used with the sample group, it was given to 100 mothers for the second time ten days later for test-retest reliability.The questionnaire was developed by Lederman and Weingarten in 1981, contains 82 items and has seven subscale internal consistency reliability between 0.81 and 0.92.The internal consistency reliability coefficient to evaluate the reliability of the Turkish version of the tool was found to be a high level( =0.87), and the subcategory internal consistency reliability coefficients varied between 0.64 and 0.84.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The test-retest reliability coefficient that added all of the tool's items was found to be at a high level (r=0.87).As a result of this study, Postpartum Self Evaluation Questionnaire is validity and reability for Turkish society.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Validity and Reliability Study of thePostpartum Self Evaluation QuestionnaireThis research was conducted to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Postpartum Self Evaluation Questionnaire which was developed to evaluate the adaptation of women in the early period following childbirth.The research population consisted of a total of 420 women who lived in Denizli province center, were between the 3rd day and the 6th week postpartum, were between 20-38 years of age, knew how to read and write and knew Turkish, had delivered their child vaginally, lived with their husbands, who did not have and whose infant did not have any physical or psychological illness or disability. After the tool was used with the sample group, it was given to 100 mothers for the second time ten days later for test-retest reliability.The questionnaire was developed by Lederman and Weingarten in 1981, contains 82 items and has seven subscale internal consistency reliability between 0.81 and 0.92.The internal consistency reliability coefficient to evaluate the reliability of the Turkish version of the tool was found to be a high level( =0.87), and the subcategory internal consistency reliability coefficients varied between 0.64 and 0.84. Based on the result of the Pearson correlation analysis conducted to evaluate the tool's reliability no items were removed from the tool. The test-retest reliability coefficient that added all of the tool's items was found to be at a high level (r=0.87).As a result of this study, Postpartum Self Evaluation Questionnaire is validity and reability for Turkish society.

Özet

Bu araştırma doğum yapan kadınların yeni döneme uyumlarını değerlendirmek üzere geliştirilen “Postpartum Kendini Değerlendirme Ölçeği’nin(Postpartum Self Evaluation Ques-tionnaire) güvenirlik ve geçerliğini değerlendirmek için yapılmıştır.Araştırmanın örneklemini Denizli il merkezinde yaşayan, postpartum üçüncü gün ile altıncı hafta arasında bulunan, 20-38 yaşları arasında,okuma–yazma ve Türkçe bilen, vajinal doğum yapmış, eşi ile birlikte yaşayan, kendisinde ve bebekte fiziksel ya da psikolojik bir rahatsızlık/sakatlık olmayan toplam 420 kadın oluşturmuştur. Ölçek, örneklem grubunda uygulandıktan sonra test-tekrar test için on gün arayla 100 anneye ikinci kez uygulanmıştır. Lederman ve Weingarten tarafın-dan 1981 yılında geliştirilen ölçeğin 7 alt boyutu ve 82 maddesi bulunmakta, toplam ölçek ve alt ölçek iç tutarlık güvenirlik katsayıları 0.81 ile 0.92 arasında değişmektedir.Türkçe’ye çevrilen ölçeğin güvenirliğini değerlendirmek için yapılan iç tutarlık güvenirlik katsayısı yüksek düzeyde ( =0.87), alt grupların iç tutarlık güve-nirlik katsayıları 0.64 ile 0.84 arasında bulunmuştur. Ölçeğin güvenirliğini değerlendirmede madde toplam puan analizi sonucuna görer=0.30-0.59 arasında bulunmuş ve hiçbir madde ölçekten çıkartılmamıştır. Ölçeğin test-tekrar test güvenirlik katsayısı ise yüksek düzeyde bulunmuştur (r=0.87). Bu sonuçlara göre ölçeğin Türk toplumu için geçerli ve güvenilir olduğuna karar verilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞÇI, D. K., METE, S. (2022). Validity and reliability study of the postpartum self evaluation questionnaire. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 20–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/453225

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Balcombe J (1992). Postnatal depression how can the distress be alleviated. Nursing Times 19(1):29-33.
  2. Beck CT (1998). A rewiew of research ınstruments for use during the postpartum period. Maternal and Child Nursing 23(5):38-42.
  3. Benson RC (1994). Obsteterics and Gynecoicgy. 7.Edition,
  4. Los Attes, Lange Medikal Publication, 235. Blum JW, Beaudoin CM, Lemos LC (2004). Physical activitiy patterns and maternal weel-being in postpartum women. Maternal and Child Health Journal 8(3):163-169.
  5. Collins LO, Tiedje H, Stommel E et al. (1992). Maternal role attainment and ıdentity in the postpartum period: stabilitiy and change. Nursing Research 35(2):68-71.
  6. Crow K, Von Baeyer C (1989). Predictors of a positive childbirth experience, Birth 16(2):59. Erkuş A (2003). Psikometri Üzerine Yazılar. Birinci Basım, Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları, Ankara, 57-72.
  7. Güler K (1998). Prenatal bakımı etkileyen faktörlerle ilgili epidemiyolojik bir çalışma. Hemşirelik Bülteni 3:12. Hodnett ED (1996). Nursing support of the laboring woman. Journal of Obstetric and Gynaecology Nursing 25(3):257-264.
  8. Kiehl EM, White MA (2003). Maternal adaptation during childbearing in Norway, Sweden and United States, Scandinavian. Journal of Caring Sciences 17(2):96-103.
  9. Lederman RP, Raff, BS, Carroll P (1981). Perinatal Parental Behavior: Nursing Research and Implications for Newborn Health, March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, Birth Defects:Original Article Series. Newyork 17(6): 200-231.
  10. Lederman RP, Lederman E (1987). Dimensions of postpartum adaptation: comparions of multiparas 3 days and 6 week after delivery. Journal of Psyhosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology 7: 193-203.
  11. Moore M (1983).
  12. Realities in Childbearing, Philadelphia, W.B.Saunders Company, 895. Özdamar K (1999). Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizleri-1 SPSS-Minitab, 2.Baskı.
  13. Kaan Kitabevi.
  14. Eskişehir. Rubin R (1986). Puerperal Change. Nursing Outlook 9(12): 35-48.
  15. Taşkın L (1997). Doğum ve Kadın Sağlığı Hemşireliği. 5. Baskı,
  16. Sistem Ofset Matbaacılık, Ankara, 365-366.
  17. Tulman L, Fawcett J, Groblewski L et al. (1990). Building a programme of research from the roy adaptation model of nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 15(1): 720-723.