SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Health Technology Assessment / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

Using Clinical Practice Protocols To Evaluate Clinical Quality Of Care

Klinik Kalite Değerlendirmesinde Klinik Protokollerin Kullanımı

Mustafa Said YILDIZ
Pages
33–47
Publication Date
2023-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, recent advances in the use of clinical protocols in clinical quality efforts within the Ministry of Health were also included.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Improving quality in healthcare is one of the most important aims of clinical protocols.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study; the procedure to be followed for the adaptation of clinical guidelines into medical evaluation criterias, performance indicators and quality standards; requirements for practitioner adoption of clinical indicators and a roadmap for generating performance indicators from clinical guidelines were also shared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, recent advances in the use of clinical protocols in clinical quality efforts within the Ministry of Health were also included.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:klinik uygulama kılavuzu · klinik protokol · sağlık hizmetlerinin kalitesi

Abstract

Improving quality in healthcare is one of the most important aims of clinical protocols. Determination of procedures in order to establish relationship between clinical protocols and clinical quality indicators, development of clinical quality improvement processes and implementing quality improvement projects would provide vital contributions to the health system. In this study; the procedure to be followed for the adaptation of clinical guidelines into medical evaluation criterias, performance indicators and quality standards; requirements for practitioner adoption of clinical indicators and a roadmap for generating performance indicators from clinical guidelines were also shared. In addition, recent advances in the use of clinical protocols in clinical quality efforts within the Ministry of Health were also included.

Özet

Klinik protokollerin en önemli kullanım amaçlarından biri sağlıkta kaliteyi iyileştirmektir. Klinik protokolleri klinik kalite göstergeleri ile ilişkilendirmek için prosedürlerin belirlenmesi, klinik kalite iyileştirme süreçlerinin geliştirilmesi ve uygulanması sağlık sistemine hayati katkılar sağlayacaktır. Bu çalışmada; klinik kılavuzların medikal değerlendirme kriteri, performans ölçeği ve kalite standardına dönüşümü için izlenecek yol; klinik göstergelerin uygulayıcılarca benimsenmesi için gereklilikler ve klinik kılavuzlardan performans göstergeleri oluşturmak için bir yol haritası paylaşılmıştır. Ayrıca Sağlık Bakanlığı bünyesinde klinik kalite çalışmalarında klinik protokollerin kullanımı konusunda gelişmelere de yer verilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, M. S. (2023). Using Clinical Practice Protocols To Evaluate Clinical Quality Of Care. Eurasian Journal of Health Technology Assessment, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 33–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/946005

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (1995) Entwistle. Using clinical practice guidelines to evaluate quality of care. 1. Issues. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services (AHCPR publication No 95-0045.)
  2. Blozik, E., Nothacker, M., Bunk, T., Szecsenyi, J., Ollenschläger, G., & Scherer, M. (2012). Simultaneous development of guidelines and quality indicators -- how do guideline groups act? A worldwide survey. International journal of health care quality assurance, 25(8), 712–729. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526861211270659
  3. Bouchard, C., & Jean, O. (2017). Tracer methodology: an appropriate tool for assessing compliance with accreditation standards?. The International journal of health planning and management, 32(4), e299–e315. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2376
  4. Entwistle, V. A., Watt, I. S., Davis, H., Dickson, R., Pickard, D., & Rosser, J. (1998). Developing information materials to present the findings of technology assessments to consumers. The experience of the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. International journal of technology assessment in health care, 14(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462300010527
  5. Feder G., Eccles M., Grol R., Griffiths C., Grimshaw J. (1999).
  6. Using clinical guidelines, Education and debate, BMJ, 318: 728-30
  7. Gude, W. T., Brown, B., van der Veer, S. N., Colquhoun, H. L., Ivers, N. M., Brehaut, J. C., Landis-Lewis, Z., Armitage, C. J., de Keizer, N. F., & Peek, N. (2019). Clinical performance comparators in audit and feedback: a review of theory and evidence. Implementation science: IS, 14(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0887-1
  8. Huttin, C. (1997). The Use of Clinical Guidelines to Improve Medical Practice: Main Issues in the United States International Journal for Quality in Health Can, 9(3):207-214 Institute of Medicine – IOM (1990). Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Field MJ, Lohr KN, editors. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  9. Institute of Medicine - IOM (2011). Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines; Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D, et al., editors. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US);. 6, Promoting Adoption of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209543/
  10. Klinik Kalite Programı (2023). Kolorektal Kanser Gösterge Kartları, https://shgmklinikkalite