SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kent Akademisi / 2026 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2

The Relation Between National Culture and Countries’ Efficacy on Struggling Activities With Covid-19

Ulusal Kültür ile Ülkelerin Covid-19 Mücadele Faaliyetlerindeki Etkinliği Arasındaki İlişkinin Araştırılması

Nurdanur Tavlan Soydan(ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4320-2257
İbrahim Aksel(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2994-6735
Pages
1055–1077
Publication Date
2023-06-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, the controlled variable of GDP [gross domestic product] per capita of the countries made no difference on the results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study has prepared by help of the secondary data with the aim to inspect the relation between countries’ efficacy on struggling This study has prepared by help of the secondary data with the aim to inspect the relation between efficacy of countries on combating activities with COVID-19, and national culture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:COVID-19 Regional Safety Assessment index, which was prepared by Deep Knowledge Group and included 250 countries, was used to measure the countries’ efficacy on their struggle on COVID-19.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, the controlled variable of GDP [gross domestic product] per capita of the countries made no difference on the results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kültür · Ulusal Kültür · Hofstede’nin Kültürel Boyutları

Abstract

This study has prepared by help of the secondary data with the aim to inspect the relation between countries’ efficacy on struggling This study has prepared by help of the secondary data with the aim to inspect the relation between efficacy of countries on combating activities with COVID-19, and national culture. Index of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions was used to measure the national culture. COVID-19 Regional Safety Assessment index, which was prepared by Deep Knowledge Group and included 250 countries, was used to measure the countries’ efficacy on their struggle on COVID-19. COVID-19 Regional Safety Assessment index was designed to classify, analyse and order the weakness and strength of the countries which faces opportunities and threats due to the outcome of the global health, and economy crisis which triggered by the COVID-19. Data of 93 countries, which have the points belong to each cultural dimensions of Hofstede from 250 countries included in COVID-19 Regional Safety Assessment index, was included in the analysis. In the result of the multiple regression analysis, relation between the dimensions of “power distance” and “long/short term focus” and efficacy of countries on their combating COVID-19 is statistically significant. Also, the controlled variable of GDP [gross domestic product] per capita of the countries made no difference on the results.

Özet

Bu çalışma ulusal kültür ile ülkelerin COVID-19 ile mücadele faaliyetlerindeki etkinlikleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek amacıyla ikincil verilerden faydalanılarak hazırlanmıştır. Ulusal kültürü ölçmek için Hofstede’nin kültürel boyutları endeksi, ülkelerin COVID-19 ile mücadele faaliyetlerindeki etkinliğini ölçmek için Deep Knowledge Group tarafından hazırlanan ve 250 ülkenin dahil edildiği COVID-19 Bölgesel Güvenlik Değerlendirmesi endeksinden faydalanılmıştır. COVID-19 Bölgesel Güvenlik Değerlendirmesi endeksi COVID-19'un tetiklediği küresel sağlık krizi ve ekonomik kriz sonucu ülkelerin karşı karşıya oldukları fırsat ve tehditleri, sahip oldukları güçlü ve zayıf yönleri sınıflandırmak, analiz etmek ve sıralamak için tasarlanmıştır. COVID-19 Bölgesel Güvenlik Değerlendirmesine dahil edilen 250 ülkeden Hofstede’nin tüm kültür boyutlarına ait puanlara sahip olan 93 ülkenin verileri analize dahil edilmiştir. Yapılan çoklu regresyon analizi sonucunda bulgular güç mesafesi ve uzun/kısa döneme odaklanma boyutlarının ülkelerin COVID-19 ile mücadele faaliyetlerindeki etkinlikleri arasında istatistiki olarak anlamlı bir ilişki olduğunu destekler niteliktedir. Ayrıca ülkelerin kişi başına gayrisafi yurtiçi hasıla değişkeni kontrol altına alınmış ve sonuçlar farklılık göstermemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Soydan, N. T., Aksel, İ. (2023). The Relation Between National Culture and Countries’ Efficacy on Struggling Activities With Covid-19. Kent Akademisi, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2, 1055–1077. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1098652

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (37)

  1. Biddlestone, M., Green, R. & Douglas, K. M. (2020) Cultural orientation, power, belief in conspiracy theories, and intentions to reduce the spread of COVID-19. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59, 663-673. DOI:10.1111/bjso.12397
  2. Chen, C., Chen, X. P., & Meindl, J. (1998). How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism. Academy of Management Review. 23, 285- 304. DOI: doi.org/10.2307/259375
  3. Chen, C., Peng, M., & Saparito, W. (2002). Collectivism, individualism, and opportunism: A cultural perspective on transaction cost economics. Journal of Management. 28, 567-583. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/0149206302028004
  4. Datta, A. (2020). Self(ie)-governance: Technologies of intimate surveillance in Hindistan under COVID-19. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10(2), 234–237. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/2043820620929797
  5. Debode, J. D., & Haggard, D. L. (2020) Economic freedom and Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 23(1), 65-84. DOI 10.1108/IJOTB-11-2018-0124
  6. Deep Konowledge Group. (2020). COVID-19 Regional safety asessment index. https://www.dkv.global/covid-safety-assessment-250-regions (Erişim tarihi: 05.09.2020)
  7. Delaney, A. (2020). The politics of scale in the coordinated management ve emergency response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10(2), 141–145. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/2043820620934922
  8. Frey, C. B., Chen, C., & Presidente G. (2020) Presidente democracy, culture, ve contagion: political regimes ve countries responsiveness to COVID-19, COVID Econ. 18 (2020), 1-20
  9. Finn, B. M., & Kobayashi, L. C. (2020). Structural inequality in the time of COVID-19: Urbanization, segregation, and pandemic control in sub-Saharan Africa. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10(2), 217–220. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/2043820620934310
  10. Hiko, A., & Wang, A. H.-E. (2020). Out-of-control COVID-19 pandemic hampers the nationalism. Political Studies Review. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/1478929920973524
  11. Hofstede, G. (1983). National cultures in four dimensions: A research based theory of cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management and Organization, 13(1-2), 46-74. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1983.11656358
  12. Hofstede, G. (1984). Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pasific Journal of Management, 1, 81-99.
  13. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5-21.
  14. Hofstede, G. (2001), Cultures Consequenses. Sage Publications.
  15. Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R.R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(1), 52-88. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/1069397103259443
  16. Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Long- versus short-term orientation: New perspectives. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(4), 493-504. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/13602381003637609
  17. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. The McGraw-Hill.
  18. Hofstede, G. (2010). Cultures and organizations. The Mcraw–Hill.
  19. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede modelin context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-26.
  20. Hofstede, G. J. (2020). Divided, we stve: united, we fall. https://geerthofstede.com/boss-blog-9-corona-across-cultures/ (Erişim tarihi: 12 Ocak 2020)
  21. Hussain, A. H. M. B. (2020). State policies decrease movement during COVID-19. Contexts, 19(4), 51–55. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/1536504220977936
  22. Im, H., & Chen, C. (2020). Social distancing around the globe: cultural correlates of reduced mobility. DOI: doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/b2s37
  23. Ibanez, A., & Sisodia, G.S. (2022) The role of culture on 2020 SARS-CoV-2 country deaths a pandemic management based on cultural dimensions. GeoJournal, DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10306-0
  24. James, A. C. (2020). Don’t stve so close to me: Public spaces, behavioral geography ve COVID-19. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10(2), 187–190. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/2043820620935672
  25. Kanungo, R. N., & Jaeger, A. M. (1990). Introduction: The need for ındigenous management in developing countries: Management in developing countries. Routledge.
  26. Lachman, R., Need, A., & Hinings, B. (1994). Analyzing cross-national management and organizations: A theoretical framework. Management Science, 40(1), 40-55.
  27. Lo, M.-C. M. (2020). How Taiwan’s precautionary approach contained COVID-19. Contexts, 19(4), 18–21. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/1536504220977929
  28. Meeuwesen, L., Brink, A. & Hofstede, G. (2009). Can dimensions of national culture predict cross-national differences in medical communication? Patient Education and Counseling, 75(1), 58-66. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.09.015
  29. Orr, L. M., & Hauser, W. (2008). A re-ınquıry of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions: A call for 21st century cross-cultural research. Marketing Management Journal, 18(2), 1-19.
  30. Pfrimer M. H., &Barbosa R. (2020) Brezilya’s war on COVID-19: Crisis, not conflict—doctors, not generals. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10(2):137-140. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/204382062092488
  31. Shepherd, H., MacKendrick, N., & Mora, G. C. (2020). pandemic politics. political worldviews and covıd-19 beliefs and practices in an unsettled time. Socius. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/2378023120972575
  32. Schein, H. E. (1992). Organizational cultere and leadership. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  33. Switzer, D., Wang, W., & Hirschvogel, L. (2020). Municipal utilities and COVID-19: Challenges, responses, and collaboration. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(6–7), 577–583. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/02750740209417
  34. Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Betancourt, H., Bond, M., Leung, K., Brenes, A., & Montmollin, G. (1986). The measurement of the etic aspects of individualism and collectivism across cultures. Australian Journal of Psychology, 38(3), 257–267.
  35. Wang, Y. (2021) Government policies, national culture ve social distancing during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: International evidence. Safety Science, 135, 105-138. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105138
  36. Wilson, S. (2020). Pandemic leadership: lessons from new zelland’s approach to COVID-19. Leadership, 16(3), 279–293. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/1742715020929151
  37. Kişi Başına Düşen Gayrisafi Yurtiçi Hasıla. https.//data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.KN (Erişim tarihi: 25.05.2020)