Journals / Uludağ İlahiyat Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2

ABŪ SHAKŪR AL-SĀLIMĪ AND HIS THEOLOGICAL IDENTITY WITHIN THE SCOPE OF AL-TAMHĪD FĪ BAYĀN AL-TAWḤĪD

Ebû Şekûr Es-Sâlimî Ve Et-Temhîd Fî Beyâni’t-Tevhîd Bağlamında İtikadî Kimliği

Pages
1–16
Publication Date
2018-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Nevertheless, it is possible to say that he followed and fused the ideas of both of two authorities, Abū Ḥanīfah and al-Imām al-Māturīdī, and at the same time, preserved his own authenticity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Even though al-Imām al-Māturīdī was praised by certain scholars, such as his master Abū Naṣr al-ʿIyāḍī, and was described later as the founder of Māturīdiyyah by both his school’s followers and his competitors, such as Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, it is clear that his school took form based on the ideational foundations of Abū Ḥanīfah.
📊
Key Findings & Data:No doubt that, despite his rational (grounded on raʾy) and interpretivist attitudes in the issues of fiqh, the fact that Abū Ḥanīfah had a more moderate and conservative attitude that is not completely contrary to that of Ahl al-ḥadīth in credal/theological issues had an effect on this.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Nevertheless, it is possible to say that he followed and fused the ideas of both of two authorities, Abū Ḥanīfah and al-Imām al-Māturīdī, and at the same time, preserved his own authenticity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ebû Şekûr es-Sâlimî · et-Temhîd fî beyâni’t-tevhîd · Hanefî/Mâtürîdî gelenek

Abstract

Even though al-Imām al-Māturīdī was praised by certain scholars, such as his master Abū Naṣr al-ʿIyāḍī, and was described later as the founder of Māturīdiyyah by both his school’s followers and his competitors, such as Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, it is clear that his school took form based on the ideational foundations of Abū Ḥanīfah. In places like Khurāsān and Transoxiana where Māturīdiyyah spreaded most, the most prominent followers have been the Ḥanafī scholars and the school was called Ḥanafiyyah/Māturīdiyyah because of its “dual-authoritative” nature. While Ḥanafīs of Samarqand embraced a more kalāmī/dialectical methodology much like al-Imām al-Māturīdī, Ḥanafīs of Bukhārā had a more scripturalist/traditionalist attitude with some caution of rational interpretation (taʾwīl). No doubt that, despite his rational (grounded on raʾy) and interpretivist attitudes in the issues of fiqh, the fact that Abū Ḥanīfah had a more moderate and conservative attitude that is not completely contrary to that of Ahl al-ḥadīth in credal/theological issues had an effect on this. Even though he preserved his kalāmī methodology and style in congruence with his school and penned an entirely theological book named al-Tamhīd, Abū Shakūr al-Sālimī, a representative of Samarqand Ḥanafī/Māturīdī tradition, had some ideas and views compatible with the “conservative” Bukhārā-based Ḥanafī/Māturīdī position, probably because of perceiving Abū Ḥanīfah as the absolute authority. Nevertheless, it is possible to say that he followed and fused the ideas of both of two authorities, Abū Ḥanīfah and al-Imām al-Māturīdī, and at the same time, preserved his own authenticity.

Özet

İmam Mâtürîdî, , belli bir dönemden sonra kendi mezhebinin mensupları ve hatta Fahreddin er-Râzî gibi rakipleri tarafından Mâtürîdiyye’nin kurucusu olarak nitelense de, mezhebin, Ebû Hanîfe tarafından atılan fikrî temeller üzerinde şekillendiği açıktır. Mâtürîdiyye'nin en fazla yayılım gösterdiği Horasan ve Mâverâünnehr coğrafyasında en başta gelen temsilcileri de Hanefî fakihler olmuş, bir anlamda “çift otoriteli” yapısı sebebiyle mezhep Hanefiyye/Mâtürîdiyye olarak da anılmıştır. Semerkand Hanefîleri büyük ölçüde İmam Mâtürîdî gibi daha cedelî/kelâmî bir metot benimsemekle birlikte, Buhârâ merkezli Hanefî fakihler daha nassçı ve tevile daha temkinli yaklaşan bir tavır içinde olmuştur. Ebû Hanîfe’nin fıkıh alanındaki re’y ve yorumculuğuna nispetle itikadî alanda ehl-i hadise tamamen aykırı olmayan mutedil ve muhafazakâr denilebilecek bir yol takip etmesi şüphesiz bunda etkili olmuştur. Semerkand Hanefî/Mâtürîdî geleneğinin temsilcisi olan Ebû Şekûr es-Sâlimî, bir yandan mensubu bulunduğu çizgiye uygun olarak kelâmî usul ve üslubu korusa ve et-Temhîd gibi tam anlamıyla bir kelâm eseri kaleme alsa da bir yandan da Ebû Hanîfe’yi mutlak otorite görmenin etkisiyle olsa gerek “muhafazakâr” Buhârâ Hanefî/Mâtürîdî çizgisine uyumlu tespit ve görüşler ortaya koymuştur. Maamâfih onun hem Ebû Hanîfe ve İmam Mâtürîdî gibi iki otoriteyi bir arada eklektik biçimde mezc ve takip ettiği hem de zaman zaman özgünlüğe göz kırptığı söylenebilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILAVUZ, U. M. (2018). ABŪ SHAKŪR AL-SĀLIMĪ AND HIS THEOLOGICAL IDENTITY WITHIN THE SCOPE OF AL-TAMHĪD FĪ BAYĀN AL-TAWḤĪD. Uludağ İlahiyat Dergisi, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2, 1–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/934630

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Abū Ḥanīfah, al-Imām al-Aʿẓam al-Nuʿmān ibn Thābit (d. 150/767), al-ʿĀlim wa-l-mutaʿallim (ed. Muḥammad Zāhid al-Kawtharī), along with Turkish translation by Mustafa Öz, in İmâm-ı Azamın Beş Eseri, Istanbul: Kalem Yayıncılık 1981, pp. 8-34. ______, al-Fiqh al-akbar (ed. Muḥammad Zāhid al-Kawtharī), along with Turkish translation by Mustafa Öz, in İmâm-ı Azamın Beş Eseri, Istanbul: Kalem Yayıncılık 1981, pp. 56-64. ______, al-Waṣiyyah (ed. Muḥammad Zāhid al-Kawtharī), along with Turkish translation by Mustafa Öz, in İmâm-ı Azamın Beş Eseri, Istanbul: Kalem Yayıncılık 1981, pp. 71-75. ʿAlī al-Qārī, Abū l-Ḥasan Nūr al-Dīn ʿAlī ibn Sulṭān Muḥammad (d. 1014/1605), Minaḥ al-rawḍ al-azhar fī sharḥ al-Fiqh al-akbar, along with Wahbī Sulaymān Ghāwijī’s al-Taʿlīq al-muyassar ʿalá Sharḥ al-Fiqh al-akbar, Beirut: Dār al-bashāʾir al-Islāmiyyah 1998. ______, Shamm al-ʿawāriḍ fī dhamm al-Rawāfiḍ (ed. Majīd Khalaf), Cairo: Markaz al-Furqān li-l-dirāsāt al-Islāmiyyah 2004. al-Bābartī, Akmal al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Maḥmūd ibn Aḥmad (d. 786/1384), Sharḥ Waṣiyyat al-Imām Abī Ḥanīfah (ed. Muḥammad al-ʿĀyidī & Ḥamzah al-Bakrī), Amman: Dār al-fatḥ li-l-dirāsāt wa-l-nashr 2009. Bayāḍīzādah, Kamāl al-Dīn Aḥmad ibn Ḥasan ibn Sinān al-Dīn (d. 1098/1687), Ishārāt al-marām min ʿibārāt al-Imām Abī Ḥanīfah al-Nuʿmān fī uṣūl al-dīn (ed. Aḥmad Farīd al-Mazīdī), Beirut: Dār al-kutub al-ʿilmiyyah 2007. ______, al-Uṣūl al-munīfah li-l-Imām Abī Ḥanīfah (ed. and Turkish translation İlyas Çelebi), Istanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi İlâhiyat Fakültesi Vakfı Yayınları 2006. al-Bazdawī, Abū l-Yusr Ṣadr al-Islām Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad ibn Ḥusayn (d. 493/1100), Uṣūl al-dīn (ed. Hans Peter Linss, annot. Aḥmad Ḥijāzī al-Saqqā), Cairo: al-Maktabah al-Azhariyyah li-l-turāth 2003.
  2. Bruckmayr, Philipp, “The Spread and Persistence of Māturīdi Kalām and Underlying Dynamics,” Iran and the Caucasus, 13/1 (2009), pp. 59-92.
  3. Göksoy, İsmail Hakkı, “Nûreddin er-Rânîrî,” TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi (DİA), XXXIII, 256-257.
  4. Gömbeyaz, Kadir, “Doğu Hanefî Fırak Geleneğinin Ebû Hanîfe ile İrtibatlandırılmasının İmkânı,” Devirleri Aydınlatan Meş‘ale İmâm-ı A‘zam - Ulusal Sempozyum Tebliğler Kitabı (ed. Ahmet Kartal & Hilmi Özden), Eskişehir: Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi 2015, pp. 505-511. ______, İslam Literatüründe İtikâdî Fırka Tasnifleri (PhD diss., Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü), Bursa 2015. Ibn al-Humām, Kamāl al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Wāḥid ibn ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd (d. 861/1457), Kitāb al-musāyarah, along with Ka