Journals / e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Turkish version of the Career and Work Adaptability Questionnaire (CWAQ): Validity and Reliability Study

İş ve Meslek Hayatına Uyum Ölçeği (İMHUÖ) Türkçe Formu: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Pages
76–87
Publication Date
2014-04-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall internal consistency coefficient of the scale was .93.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Career and Work Adaptability Questionnaire (CWAQ; Nota, Ginevra, and Soresi, 2012).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants of research were 332 (183 female and 149 male) teachers who were employed in different schools in Istanbul and Sakarya.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall internal consistency coefficient of the scale was .93.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Career and work adapt abilities · validity · reliability

Abstract

The aim of this research is to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Career and Work Adaptability Questionnaire (CWAQ; Nota, Ginevra, and Soresi, 2012). The validity and reliability of scale was investigated by test re-test, Cronbach alpha, confirmatory factor analysis and criterion related validity methods. The Career Adaptability and Optimism Scale was used for the criterion related validity. The participants of research were 332 (183 female and 149 male) teachers who were employed in different schools in Istanbul and Sakarya. Results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the five-dimensional Career and Work Adaptability model (confidence, control, cooperation, curiosity, and concern) was well fit (x²=1082.87, df= 416, RMSEA=.052, NNFI= .90, CFI=.91, IFI=.91, RFI=.84, GFI= .89, SRMR= .047). The internal consistency coefficients of five subscales were .83, .69, .88, .81, and .67 respectively. In the concurrent validity significant relationship (r= .43) was found between the Career Adaptability-Optimism Scale and the Career -Work Adaptability Questionnaire. The overall internal consistency coefficient of the scale was .93. Test-retest reliability coefficient was .72. The corrected item-total correlations of CWAQ ranged from .40 to .63. The t-test results differences between each item’s means of upper 27% and lower 27% points were significant. Overall findings demonstrated that this scale had high validity and reliability scores and that it may be used in order to measure degree of career adaptability accurately.

Özet

Teknolojinin baş döndürücü bir şekilde gelişmesi, artan yükümlülükler, sosyal ilişkilerin zayıflaması vs. ile birlikte insanların işe adapte olması da zorlaşmaktadır. Yani iş ve meslek sahibi olmak ne kadar zor ise kariyer hayatına atıldıktan sonra iş ve mesleğe uyum sağlamak bir o kadar zor gözükmektedir. Bu yüzden çalışanların iş ve mesleğine uyum yetenek düzeylerini belirlemek oluşturulacak önlem programları için önem arz etmektedir. Bu araştırmanın amacı Nota, Ginevra ve Soresi (2012) tarafından geliştirilen İş ve Meslek Hayatına Uyum Ölçeğini Türkçeye uyarlamak ve ölçeğin geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizlerini yapmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kaya, Ç., AKIN, A., SARIÇAM, H., UĞUR, E. (2014). Turkish version of the Career and Work Adaptability Questionnaire (CWAQ): Validity and Reliability Study. e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 76–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/882503

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akın, A., Hamedoğlu, M. A., Kaya, Ç., Arslan, S., Demir, T., Sarıçam, H., Uysal, R. (2014). Turkish Version of the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS): The Validity and Reliability Study (Chapter 54). In Banerjee, S., Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2014).
  2. Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2012. 499- 505, Springer: Dordrecht Bentler, P. M., & Bonet, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
  3. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara:
  4. Pegem Akademi yayınları. Davy, J. A., Kinicki, A., & Scheck, C. L. (1997). A test of job security's direct and mediated effects on withdrawal cognitions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 323−349. Erdoğmuş Zorver, C., & Korkut Owen, F. (2011). Kariyer Uyumu ve İyimserliği Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi. XI. Ulusal Psikolojik Danışmanlık ve Rehberlik Kongresi, 27 Eylül 2011,
  5. İzmir.
  6. Erdoğmuş Zorver, C. (2011). Kariyer Uyumu ve İyimserliği Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara. İŞKUR, (2011). İş ve Meslek Danışmanlığı. Ankara:
  7. Altan Özyurt Matbaacılık. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 155. Klehe, U., Zikic, J., Van Vianen A.E.M. & De Pater, I.E. (2011). Career adaptability, turnover and loyalty during organizational downsizing, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 217-229.
  8. Kline, P. (2000). Handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge. Nota, L., Ginevra, M.C., & Soresi, S. (2012). The Career and Work Adaptability Questionnaire (CWAQ): A first contribution to its validation. Journal of Adolescence, 35(6), 1557-69.
  9. Rottinghaus, P. J., Day, S. X., & Borgen, F. H. (2005). The Career Futures Inventory: A measure of career-related adaptability and optimism. Journal of Career Assessment, 13, 3-24.
  10. Savickas, M. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. In R. W. Lent, & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (42–70).
  11. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Savickas, M. L., Nota, L., Rossier, J., Dauwalder, J. P., Duarte, M. E., Guichard, J., Soresi, S., Van Esbroeck, R., & van Vianen, A. E. M. (2009). Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21st century. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75, 239–250.
  12. Savickas, M. L. (2011). Contracting careers: Ac