For this reason, in this study, unlike other studies, it is aimed to analyze the validity of Jevons paradox in the context of the environment.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: In this study, it is aimed to determine the validity of Jevons paradox in the context of environmental economics.Methodology: An econometric analysis method is applied by using the data of the selected 15 emerging market economies (Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Indonesia, South Africa, India, Colombia, Malaysia, Mexico, Pakistan, Peru, Romania, Chile, Thailand, Türkiye) for the period of 1990-2017.Findings: It has been determined that industrialization and economic growth increase environmental pollution and the validity of Jevons paradox has been confirmed within the scope of the study.Originality: The validity of the Jevons paradox has been the subject of examination, especially on the relationship between energy efficiency and consumption, whereas the studies on the environment have been more limited.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Purpose: In this study, it is aimed to determine the validity of Jevons paradox in the context of environmental economics.Methodology: An econometric analysis method is applied by using the data of the selected 15 emerging market economies (Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Indonesia, South Africa, India, Colombia, Malaysia, Mexico, Pakistan, Peru, Romania, Chile, Thailand, Türkiye) for the period of 1990-2017.Findings: It has been determined that industrialization and economic growth increase environmental pollution and the validity of Jevons paradox has been confirmed within the scope of the study.Originality: The validity of the Jevons paradox has been the subject of examination, especially on the relationship between energy efficiency and consumption, whereas the studies on the environment have been more limited.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this reason, in this study, unlike other studies, it is aimed to analyze the validity of Jevons paradox in the context of the environment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Jevons Paradoksu · Ekolojik İktisat · Çevre Ekonomisi
Abstract
Purpose: In this study, it is aimed to determine the validity of Jevons paradox in the context of environmental economics.Methodology: An econometric analysis method is applied by using the data of the selected 15 emerging market economies (Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Indonesia, South Africa, India, Colombia, Malaysia, Mexico, Pakistan, Peru, Romania, Chile, Thailand, Türkiye) for the period of 1990-2017.Findings: It has been determined that industrialization and economic growth increase environmental pollution and the validity of Jevons paradox has been confirmed within the scope of the study.Originality: The validity of the Jevons paradox has been the subject of examination, especially on the relationship between energy efficiency and consumption, whereas the studies on the environment have been more limited. For this reason, in this study, unlike other studies, it is aimed to analyze the validity of Jevons paradox in the context of the environment.
Özet
Amaç: Bu çalışmada çevresel iktisat bağlamında Jevons paradoksu’nun geçerliliğinin tespit edilmesi amaçlanmıştır.Yöntem: Seçilmiş 15 yükselen piyasa ekonomisinin (Arjantin, Bangladeş, Brezilya, Endonezya, Güney Afrika, Hindistan, Kolombiya, Malezya, Meksika, Pakistan, Peru, Romanya, Şili, Tayland, Türkiye) 1990-2017 dönemi verilerinden yararlanılarak ekonometrik bir analiz yöntemi uygulanmıştır.Bulgular: Sanayileşmenin ve ekonomik büyümenin çevresel kirlenmeyi artırdığı tespit edilmiş ve çalışma kapsamında Jevons paradoksu’nun geçerliliği doğrulanmıştır.Özgünlük: Jevons paradoksunun geçerliliği özellikle enerji etkinliği ve tüketimi arasındaki ilişki üzerinden inceleme konusu olmuş buna karşılık çevre üzerinden yapılan incelemeler daha sınırlı kalmıştır. Bu sebeple bu çalışma diğer çalışmalardan çevre bağlamında Jevons paradoksunun geçerliliğinin analiz edilmesinin amaçlanması konusunda ayrışmaktadır.
TURGUT, E., GÖKTEN, Y. S. (2023). Does the Jevons Paradox Still Valid? The Example of Emerging Market Economies. Verimlilik Dergisi, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1, 85–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/880279
Akıncı, M., Sevinç, H. ve Yılmaz, Ö. (2018). “Jevons Paradoksu: Enerji Etkinliği ve Rebound Etkisi Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz”. Fiscaoeconomia, 2(1), 77-98.
Alcott, B. (2005), “Jevons’ Paradox”. Ecological Economics, 54, 9-21.
Bai, J. ve S. Ng. (2004). “A Panic Attack on Unit Roots and Cointegration”. Econometrica, 72(4), 1127-1177.
Başol, O. (2018). “Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Yeşil İşlerin Gelişimine İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme.” Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, (636), 71-87.
Bayar, E. (2020). “Teknolojik İnovasyonun Cinsiyetler Arası İstihdam Üzerindeki Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz.”. Yüksel Lisans Tezi, Şırnak Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Şırnak. Bersvendsen, T. ve Ditzen, J. (2020). xthst: “Testing for Slope Homogeneity in Stata”. Centre for Energy Economics Research and Policy Working Paper, 11. Breuer, J.B., McNown, R. ve Wallace, M.S. (2001). “Misleading Inferences From Panel Unit‐ Root Tests with An Illustration from Purchasing Power Parity”. Review of International Economics, 9(3), 482-493
Ceddia, M.G. (2019). “The Impact of Income, Land, and Wealth Inequality on Agricultural Expansion in Latin America”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(7), 2527-2532.
Ceddia, M.G., Sedlacek, S., Bardsley, N.O. ve Gomez-y-Paloma, S.J.G.E.C. (2013). “Sustainable Agricultural Intensification or Jevons Paradox? The Role of Public Governance in Tropical South America”. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1052-1063.
Clark, B. ve Foster, J.B. (2001). “William Stanley Jevons and The Coal Question: An Introduction to Jevons’s of The Economy of Fuel”. Organization & Environment, 14(1), 93-98.
Clack, B. ve York, R. (2005). “Carbon Metabolism: Global Capitalism, Climate Change, and the Biospheric Rift”. Theory and Society, 34(4), 391-428.
Clement, M.T. (2011). “The Jevons Paradox and Anthropogenic Global Warming: A Panel Analysis of State-Level Carbon Emissions in The United States. 1963-1997”. Society & Natural Resources, 24(9), 951-961.
Costanza, R., Daly, H.E. ve Barthlomew, J.A. (1991). “Goals, Agenda and Policy Recom- Mendations For Ecological Economics”, in R. Costanza (ed.). Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, 1- 20. Columbia University Press,
New York. De Hoyos, R.E. ve Sarafidis, V. (2006). “Testing for Cross-Sectional Dependence in Panel-Data Models”. The Stata Journal, 6(4), 482-496.