SavedAdd your journal

Journals / El-Cezeri / 2023 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

The Effects of Different Process Parameters of PLA+ on Tensile Strengths in 3D Printer Produced by Fused Deposition Modeling

Birleştirme Yığma Modellemesiyle Üretilen 3B Yazıcıda PLA+’ın Farklı Proses Parametrelerinin Çekme Dayanımları Üzerindeki Etkileri

Faik YILAN
İbrahim Baki ŞAHİN
Fatih KOÇ
Levent URTEKİN
Journal
El-Cezeri
Pages
160–174
Publication Date
2023-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, the lowest production time is observed in the gyroid infill pattern.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is a three-dimensional (3D) printing technique in which parts are produced with thermoplastic polymer layers in a highly controlled manner.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At the same time, the mechanical properties of parts printed with current print parameters and low-cost 3D printers also vary.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, the lowest production time is observed in the gyroid infill pattern.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Birleştirmeli Yığma Modelleme (BYM) · PLA+ · Dolgu Yoğunluğu

Abstract

Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is a three-dimensional (3D) printing technique in which parts are produced with thermoplastic polymer layers in a highly controlled manner. However, the production of ready-made parts using FDM is quite tricky. At the same time, the mechanical properties of parts printed with current print parameters and low-cost 3D printers also vary. The quality and mechanical characteristics of the final part are influenced by production parameters such as the extrusion temperature, infill density, infill pattern, print speed, and layer height. This study focused on the effects of the infill pattern, infill density and print speed parameters on the tensile strength and production time of model structures printed with PLA+ material. The tensile strength of the printed parts have been determined by a WDM-100E model tensile testing machine. In addition, the tensile strengths and production times of the parts have been optimized by the signal-to-noise (SN) ratio analysis. The results reveal that triangle infill pattern exhibits the best tensile strength at 40 mm/sec printing speed and 100% infill density. On the other hand, the lowest production time is observed in the gyroid infill pattern.

Özet

Birleştirmeli yığma modellemesi (BYM), son derece kontrollü bir şekilde termoplastik polimer katmanlar ile parçaların üretildiği 3B baskı tekniğidir. Ancak, BYM kullanılarak hazır parçaların üretimi baskı teknikleri arasında oldukça zordur. Bunun yanında, mümkün olan ayarlarla ve düşük maliyetli 3B yazıcılarla basılan parçaların mekanik özellikleri de değişkenlik göstermektedir. Ekstrüzyon sıcaklığı, dolgu deseni, baskı hızı ve katman yüksekliği gibi üretim parametrelerinin son parçanın kalitesini ve mekanik özelliklerini önemli ölçüde etkilediği bilinmektedir. Bu çalışmada, tarafımızdan imal edilen kartezyen tipi bir 3B yazıcıda, PLA+ malzeme kullanılarak hazırlanan numunelerin çekme dayanımı, baskı hızı ve dolgu deseni parametrelerine bağlı olarak incelenmiştir. ASTM D638-(IV) standardına göre farklı dolgu desenine, baskı hızına ve dolgu yoğunluğuna sahip toplam 36 adet test parçası hazırlanmıştır. Basılan parçalar çekme özelliklerinin belirlenebilmesi için çekme test makinesine tabi tutulmuşlardır. Parçaların çekme dayanımları ve üretim süreleri sinyal-gürültü (SN) oranına dayalı olarak analizleri yapılıp optimize edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, triangles geometrik desen, %100 dolgu yoğunluğu ve 40 mm/sn baskı hızında en iyi çekme dayanımı sergilendiğini ortaya koymaktadır. En düşük üretim süresi, gyroid geometrik desenlerde gözlemlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILAN, F., ŞAHİN, İ. B., KOÇ, F., URTEKİN, L. (2023). The Effects of Different Process Parameters of PLA+ on Tensile Strengths in 3D Printer Produced by Fused Deposition Modeling. El-Cezeri, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 160–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/879632

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Groover MP. Part II Engineering Materials. Fundam Mod Manuf Mater 2010:98–132.
  2. Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B. （BOOK）Directed Energy Deposition Processes. In: Additive Manufacturing Technologies. 2015.
  3. Dizon JRC, Espera AH, Chen Q, Advincula RC. Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Addit Manuf 2018;20:44–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002.
  4. Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ. 3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater 2016;32:54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018.
  5. Agrawaal H, Thompson JE. Additive manufacturing (3D printing) for analytical chemistry. Talanta Open 2021;3:100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talo.2021.100036. Berman B. 3-D printing: The new industrial revolution. Bus Horiz 2012;55:155–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.003. Murr LE. Frontiers of 3D Printing/Additive Manufacturing: from Human Organs to Aircraft Fabrication. J Mater Sci Technol 2016;32:987–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2016.08.011.
  6. Lille M, Nurmela A, Nordlund E, Metsä-Kortelainen S, Sozer N. Applicability of protein and fiber-rich food materials in extrusion-based 3D printing. J Food Eng 2018;220:20–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.04.034.
  7. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KTQ, Hui D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos Part B Eng 2018;143:172–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012.
  8. Wang S, Ma Y, Deng Z, Zhang S, Cai J. Effects of fused deposition modeling process parameters on tensile, dynamic mechanical properties of 3D printed polylactic acid materials. Polym Test 2020;86:106483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106483.
  9. Oladapo BI, Ismail SO, Afolalu TD, Olawade DB, Zahedi M. Review on 3D printing: Fight against COVID-19. Mater Chem Phys 2021;258:123943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123943.
  10. Tino A, Collange C, Seznec A. SIMT-X: Extending Single-Instruction Multi-Threading to Out-of-Order Cores. ACM Trans Archit Code Optim 2020;17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392032.
  11. Parandoush P, Lin D. A review on additive manufacturing of polymer-fiber composites. Compos Struct 2017;182:36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088.
  12. Gupta MK, Mia M, Pruncu CI, Kapłonek W, Nadolny K, Patra K, et al. Parametric optimization and process capability analysis for machining of nickel-based superalloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2019;102:3995–4009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001