Journals / Alanya Akademik Bakış / 2023 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Analysis of Migration in Europe from the Perspective of Employment and Ethno-Religion

Avrupa’da Göç Olgusunun İstihdam ve Etno-Din Perspektifinden Analizi

Pages
209–234
Publication Date
2023-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to another regression analysis result in the study to investigate the existence of a relationship between religious groups and wages, being Jewish has a positive effect on wages, while being Muslim has a reducing effect on wages.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The phenomenon of migration is examined in the context of the reference established between capitalism and religion in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the findings, it has been determined that there is a statistically significant difference against Muslims in terms of employment rates between Muslims and Christians in the active labor force in the relevant countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to another regression analysis result in the study to investigate the existence of a relationship between religious groups and wages, being Jewish has a positive effect on wages, while being Muslim has a reducing effect on wages.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Göç · Kapitalizm · Fırsat Eşitliği

Abstract

The phenomenon of migration is examined in the context of the reference established between capitalism and religion in this study. The theoretical basis of the study is the inequality of opportunity for some ethnic groups and Muslims in Europe. Within the scope of the study, the labor markets of England and Wales were examined as sample countries to analyze the effect of religious affiliation on employment markets. In these countries, it has been determined that the most disadvantaged religious group in terms of employment markets is Muslims. In the findings, it has been determined that there is a statistically significant difference against Muslims in terms of employment rates between Muslims and Christians in the active labor force in the relevant countries. According to another regression analysis result in the study to investigate the existence of a relationship between religious groups and wages, being Jewish has a positive effect on wages, while being Muslim has a reducing effect on wages.

Özet

Bu çalışmada göç olgusu, kapitalizm ve din arasında kurulan referans bağlamında incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın teorik altyapısını, Avrupa’da bazı etnik gruplara ve Müslümanlara yönelik fırsat eşitsizliği oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında, dini mensubiyetin istihdam piyasalarına olan etkisini analiz etmek üzere örnek ülkeler olarak İngiltere ve Galler işgücü piyasaları incelenmiştir. Söz konusu ülkelerde, istihdam piyasaları açısından en dezavantajlı dini grubun Müslümanlar olduğu belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgularda, ilgili ülkelerde aktif işgücünde Müslümanlar ile Hristiyanlar arasında istihdam oranları bakımından Müslümanlar aleyhine istatistikî açıdan anlamlı bir farklılık olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmada, dini gruplar ile ücret arasında bir ilişkinin varlığını araştırmak için yapılan bir diğer regresyon analizi sonucuna göre, Yahudi olmak, alınan ücret üzerinde pozitif bir etkiye sahip iken Müslüman olmak, ücreti azaltıcı bir etki yaratmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZMAN, H. (2023). Analysis of Migration in Europe from the Perspective of Employment and Ethno-Religion. Alanya Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 209–234. https://ajindex.com/articles/879465

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ALBAYRAK, Ö. (2008, Aralık 13). “İnanç Bahane, Sekülerleşme Şahane”. Erişim tarihi: 04.01.2021, http://www.yenisafak.com/yazarlar/ozlemalbayrak/inanc-bahane-sekulerlesme-sahane14295
  2. ARICAN, K. (2011). “Felsefî ve Teolojik Bir Problem Olarak Dini Çeşitlilik”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 71-98.
  3. ARRIGHI, G. (1994). The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and The Origins of Our Times. New York: Verso ASLAN, A. (2002). “Küreselleşme ve Din”. Köprü Dergisi, 77. AZZI, C. & Ehrenber,R. (1975). “Household Allocation of Time and Church Attendance”. Journal of Political Economy. February, 83, pp. 27–56 BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL (TY). “Population Overview” Erişim Tarihi: 12.09.2022. https://www.birmingham.gov.uk/info/50265/supporting_healthier_communities/2436/faith_and_religious_communities/2
  4. BORJAS, G.J. (1994). “The Economics of Immigration”. Journal of EconomicLiterature, 22, 1667-1717
  5. CASTLES, S., & MILLER, M. (2008). “Göçler Çağı: Modern Dünyada Uluslararası Göç Hareketleri.” (Çev. B. U. Bal & İ. Akbulut), İstanbul:
  6. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.
  7. COŞKUN, H. (2017). “Küreselleşme Sürecinde Din”. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 115-134.
  8. DEMİR, T. (2013). “Dini Çoğulculuk”. Liberal Düşünce Dergisi, (71), 41-64.
  9. DE LA FUENTE, A. (2011). “Human Capital and Productivity”. Nordic Economic Policy Review, 2(2), 103-132.
  10. DESHPANDE, A., & SINGH, J. (2021), ‘Dropping Out, Being Pushed Out or Can’t Get in? Decoding Declining Labour Force Participation of Indian Women’, IZA Discussion Paper No. 14639. DORLING, D., & RIGBY, J. E. (2007). “Net Cohort Migration in England and Wales: How Past Birth Trends May Influence Net Migration.” Population Review, 46(2), 51-62.
  11. DREHER, S., & SMITH, P. J. (Ed.). (2016). “Religious Activism in the Global Economy: Promoting, Reforming, or Resisting Neoliberal Globalization?”. Rowman & Littlefield. EKİNCİ, İ. ( 2019). Türkiye’de Küreselleşme Ekonomi ve Din. Ankara:
  12. İKSAD Yayınları, ISBN: 978-605-7695-67-3
  13. EUROEAN COMMISSION (2010). “A European Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth”. Erişim Tarihi: 11.12.2021, https://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/
  14. EUROEAN COMMISSION (2011). “2014-2020 long-term EU budget”. Erişim Tarihi: 25.12.2021, https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/eu-budget/long-term-eu-budget/2014-2020_en
  15. EUROEAN COMMISSION (2019). “Discrimination in the EU”, Special Baromete. Erişim Tarihi: 27.12.2020, https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/getS