Journals / Alanya Akademik Bakış / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3

The Moderating Role of Psychological Safety in the Effect of Entrepreneurial Leadership on Creative Performance and Innovative Work Behaviors

Girişimci Liderliğin Yaratıcı Performans ve Yenilikçi İş Davranışları Üzerindeki Etkisinde Psikolojik Güvenliğin Düzenleyici Rolü

Pınar Erkal(Balıkesir Üniversitesi Balıkesir MYO)0000-0003-4698-8475
Vacide Ancın(BALIKESİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2716-2010
Pages
864–880
Publication Date
2026-09-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study concluded that perceived psychological safety in the work environment plays a moderating role in employees' innovative work behaviors and creative performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is to examine the effect of entrepreneurial leadership on employees' innovative work behaviors and creative performance, as well as the moderating role of perceived psychological safety in these relationships.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The findings show that psychological safety has a significant moderating role in the relationship between entrepreneurial leadership and innovative work behaviors (R² = 0.749; F=386.95; p<0.01).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study concluded that perceived psychological safety in the work environment plays a moderating role in employees' innovative work behaviors and creative performance.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Girişimci Liderlik · Yaratıcı Performans · Yenilikçi İş Davranışları

Abstract

The aim of this research is to examine the effect of entrepreneurial leadership on employees' innovative work behaviors and creative performance, as well as the moderating role of perceived psychological safety in these relationships. Data were collected through a survey. The research hypotheses were tested using the SPSS PROCESS Macro. The findings show that psychological safety has a significant moderating role in the relationship between entrepreneurial leadership and innovative work behaviors (R² = 0.749; F=386.95; p<0.01). Psychological safety was found to have a significant moderating effect on the relationship between entrepreneurial leadership and creative performance (R² = 0.763; F = 416.56; p < 0.01). This study concluded that perceived psychological safety in the work environment plays a moderating role in employees' innovative work behaviors and creative performance. This study highlights the importance of employees being able to exhibit more creative and innovative behaviors when they feel psychologically safe in their work environment, alongside managers who encourage them to develop new ideas or identify and articulate new opportunities. It is considered that managers' entrepreneurial leadership skills and practices that support psychological safety in the workplace can contribute to encouraging creative and innovative behaviors among employees.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı; girişimci liderliğin çalışanların yenilikçi iş davranışları ve yaratıcı performansları üzerindeki etkisini ve bu etkide psikolojik güvenlik algısının düzenleyici rolünü incelemektir. Veriler anket yöntemi ile elde edilmiştir. Araştırma hipotezleri SPSS PROCESS Macro programı kullanılarak test edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular girişimci liderliğin yenilikçi iş davranışları üzerindeki etkisinde psikolojik güvenliğin düzenleyici rolünün anlamlı olduğunu göstermektedir (R2= 0,749; F=386,95; p<0,01). Girişimci liderliğin yaratıcı performans üzerindeki etkisinde psikolojik güvenliğin düzenleyici etkisinin (R2=0,763; F=416,56; p<0,01) anlamlı olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Araştırmada çalışanları yenilikçi davranışlara yönlendirmede ve yaratıcı performanslarını geliştirmede iş ortamındaki psikolojik güvenlik algısının düzenleyici rolünün olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Bu çalışma; çalışanları yeni fikirler geliştirmeye, yeni fırsatları görüp dile getirmeye teşvik eden yöneticiler ile birlikte iş ortamlarında fikirlerini rahatça belirtebilecek şekilde kendilerini güvende hissetmeleri durumunda çalışanların daha yaratıcı ve yenilikçi davranışlar sergileyebilmelerinin önemini ortaya koymaktadır. İş hayatında yöneticilerin girişimci liderlik becerileri ve psikolojik güvenliği destekleyen uygulamalarının, çalışanların yaratıcı ve yenilikçi davranışlarını teşvik etmeye katkı sağlayabileceği düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erkal, P., Ancın, V. (2026). The Moderating Role of Psychological Safety in the Effect of Entrepreneurial Leadership on Creative Performance and Innovative Work Behaviors. Alanya Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3, 864–880. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1909423

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (94)

  1. Addy, W. A., Ajayi-Nifise, A. O., Bello, B.G., Tula, S.T., Odeyemi, O., & Falaiye, T. (2024). Entrepreneurial leadership in high-tech industries: A review of key traits and success strategies. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 18(02), 286-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.2.0071
  2. Ahmad, I., Gao, Y., Su, F., & Khan, M. K. (2023). Linking ethical leadership to followers’ innovative work behavior in Pakistan: the vital roles of psychological safety and proactive personality. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(3), 755-772. DOI: https://doi.ogr/10.1108/EJIM-11-2020-0464
  3. Akbari, M., & Bagheri, A., Imani, S., & Asadnezhad, M. (2021). Does entrepreneurial leadership encourage innovation work behavior? The mediating role of creative self-efficacy and support for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management. 24(1), 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0283
  4. Aktamış, H., & Ergin, Ö. (2007). Bilimsel süreç becerileri ile bilimsel yaratıcılık arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, 11-23.
  5. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview Press.
  6. Anderson, N., Potocnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state of the science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40, 1297-1333. DOI: https://doi,org/10.1177/0149206314527128
  7. Arık, E., & Arık, B. (2020). Yaratıcılık ve yaratıcı olma kavramlarının günlük dilde anlamları. Psikoloji Çalışmaları, 40(2), 339-359. DOI: https://doi.ogr/ 10.26650/SP2019-0066
  8. Bagheri, A., & Pihie, Z. A. L. (2009). An exploratory study of entrepreneurial leadership development of university students. European Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 177-190.
  9. Bahar, B. (2019). Sosyal öğrenme kuramı ve sosyal değişim kuramı perspektifinden etik liderlik. Balkan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(16), 237-242.
  10. Bayrakçı, M., (2007). Sosyal öğrenme kuramı ve eğitimde uygulanması. SAÜ Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14, 198-210.
  11. Bilkay, S., & Çiçek, B. (2022). Akıllı telefon bağımlılığının öz düzenleme ve yaratıcı performans üzerine etkisi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(3), 2168-2181. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2022.1495
  12. Bradley, B. H., Postlethwaite, B. E., Klotz, A. C., Hamdani, M. R., & Brown, K. G. (2012). Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: the critical role of team psychological safety climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 151-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024200
  13. Bülbül, S., İşiaçık, S., & Aytaç, S. (2022). Measurement of perceived psychological safety: integration, review and evidence for the scale in the context of Turkey, Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 65, 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-974757
  14. Cai, W., Lysova, E.I., Khapova, S.N., & Bossink, B. A. G. (2019). Does entrepreneurial leadership foster creativity among employees and teams? The mediating role of creative efficacy beliefs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34, 203-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9536-y
  15. Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employeei involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
  16. Cohen, A. R. (2004). Building a company of leaders. Leader to Leader, 34, 16-20.
  17. Contreras, F., Espinosa, J. C., Dornberger, U., & Acosta, Y. A. C. (2017). Leadership and employees’ innovative work behavior: test of a mediation and moderation model. Asian Social Science, 13(9), 9-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n9p9
  18. Çalışkan, A., Akkoç, İ., & Turunç, Ö. (2019). Yenilikçi davranış: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 94-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29131/uiibd.562196
  19. Çiçek, B., & Çiçek, A. (2020). İşyeri nezaketsizliğinin yaratıcı çalışan performansı üzerindeki etkisi: Lider-üye etkileşiminin aracılık rolü. The Journal of Human and Work, 7(2), 267-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.644694
  20. De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring Innovative Work Behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
  21. De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., De Witte, H., Niesen, W., & Van Hootegem, G. (2014). On the relation of job insecurity, job autonomy, innovative work behavior and the mediating effect of work engagement. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(3), 318–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12079
  22. Demir, F. (2023). Girişimci liderlik: Kavram, ilişki ve yaklaşımlar. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 43, 444-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.1173171
  23. Edmondson, A., & Mogelof, J.P. (2005). Explaining psychological safety in innovation teams: Organizational culture, team Dynamics, or personality? In Creativity and innovation in organizational teams. Pschology Press, 129-156. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.4324/9781410615732
  24. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
  25. Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: the history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct, Annual Further Reviews, 1, 23-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
  26. Erkal, P., & Ancın, V. (2025). Girişimci liderlik ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(58), 2031-2052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.1598415
  27. Fatihmah, L. (2020). Maximizing learning and creativity; understanding psychological safety in simulation-based learning. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock, 13(1), 5-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_96_19
  28. Fontana, A., & Musa, S. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurial leadership on innovation management and its measurement validation, International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(1), 2-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-05-2016-0004
  29. Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta‐analytic review and extension, Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113-165. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/peps.12183
  30. Gallo, A. (2023). What is psychologcal safety? Leadership and Managing People. Harvard Business Review, 15(02), 1-9. Erişim Tarihi: 27 Ağustos 2025, https://assets.speakcdn.com/assets/2332/what_is_psychological_safety_.pdf
  31. Ge, Y. (2020). Psychological safety, employee voice, and work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 48(3), 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8907
  32. George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513-524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513
  33. Glâveanu, V. P. (2018). Educating which creativity?, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 25-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.006
  34. Gökçen, M. Y. & Çetin, S. (2022).Yenilikçi iş davranışının iş performansına etkisi. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 174-188.
  35. Greenberg, D, McKone-Sweet, K., & Wilson, H. J. (2011). The New Entrepreneurial Leader: Developing Leaders Who Shape Social and Economic Opportunity. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  36. Gupta, V., MacMillan, I. C., & Surie, G. (2004). Entrepreneurial leadership: Developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 241-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00040-5
  37. Gupta, V., & Singh, S. (2014). Psychological capital as a mediator of the relationship between leadership and creative performance behaviors: Empirical evidence from the Indian R&D sector. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(10), 1373-1394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.870311
  38. Gürbüz, S. (2019). Amos ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi. Seçkin Yayınları.
  39. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Methodology in the social sciences. Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12050
  40. Hon, A. H. Y., Bloom, M., & Crant, J. M. (2014). Overcoming resistance to change and enhancing creative performance. Journal of Management, 40(3), 919-941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415418
  41. Islam, T., Zahra, I., Rehman, S. U. & Jamit, S. (2022). How knowledge sharing encourages innovative work behavior through occupational self-efficacy? The moderating role of entrepreneurial leadership Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 73(1-2), 67-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-02-2022-0041
  42. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
  43. Jyoti, J., & Dev, M. (2015). The ımpact of transformational leadership on employee creativity: The role of learning orientation. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 9, 78-98. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JABS-03-2014-0022
  44. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
  45. Kalaycı, Ş. (2008). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Asil Yayın Dağıtım,
  46. Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In Knowledge Management and Organisational Design, Routledge, 10(1), 93-131.
  47. Karmarkar, Y., Chabra, M., & Deshpande, A. (2014). Entrepreneurial leadership style(s): A taxonomic review. Annual Research Journal of SCMS, Pune, 2(1), 156-189.
  48. Kessel, M., & Kratzer, J. & Schultz, C. (2012). Psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and creative performance in healthcare teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(2), 147-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00635.x
  49. Khan, M. A., Ismail, F.B., Hussain, A., & Alghazali, B. (2020). The interplay of leadership styles, innovative work behavior, organizational culture, and organizational citizenship behavior. Sage Open, 1, 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019898264
  50. Kuratko, D.F., Hornsby J.S., & Bishop, J.W. (2002). An examination of managers' entrepreneurial actions and job satisfaction. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(3), 75-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-005-2589-1
  51. Küçükerman, Ö. (1996). Endüstri tasarımı / endüstri için ürün tasarımında yaratıcılık. Yapı-Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları.
  52. Li, H., Jin, H., &Chen, T. (2020). Linking proactive personality to creative performance: the role of job crafting and high‐involvement work systems. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(1), 196-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.355
  53. Lynn, B., & Sarro, E. (2023). Psikolojik güvenliğin 5 bilinmeyeni. Çev. T. Kişmir. Kaynak, Psikolojik Güvenlik, 11-13. Baltaş Grubu, Erişim Tarihi: 25 Ağustos 2025 https://kaynakbaltas.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Kaynak-94-95-_-Psikolojik-Guvenlik_web-1.pdf#page=8
  54. Mamun, A. A., Ibrahim, M. D., Yusoff, M. N. H. B., & Fazal, S. A. (2018). Entrepreneurial leadership, performance, and sustainability of micro-enterprises in Malaysia. Sustainability, 10(1591), 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051591
  55. Mumford, M. D., Fichtel, M., England, S., & Newbold, T. R. (2023). Leader thinking, follower thinking: Leader impacts on follower creative performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 413-440. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-045553
  56. Navaz, A., Wenqi, J., & Akhtar, S. (2025). Entrepreneurial leadership and organizational performance: employee creativity and behavior. Management Decision, 63(7), 2486-2510. DOI: https://doi.org.10.1108/md-02-2024-0317
  57. Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27, 521-535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001
  58. Nybakk, E., & Jenssen, J. I. (2012). Innovation strategy, working climate, and financial performance in traditional manufacturing firms: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(02), 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919611003374
  59. Özay, D. D. (2024). Sorumlu liderlik, psikolojik güvenlik ve örgütsel bağlılık ilişkisi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  60. Özkan Vural, G. (2023).Yaratıcı ve yenilikçi iş davranışlarının ölçümü: Yenilikçi iş davranışları ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlama çalışması. İş’te Davranış Dergisi, 8(2), 121-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25203/idd.1370523.
  61. Pan, J., Wu, Q., Zhou, W., & Lou, Y. (2015). When is the leader’s creativity related to the followers’ creativity? A cross-level examination in China. Innovation, 17(3), 364-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.001
  62. Pauceanu, A. M., Rabie, N., Moustafa, A., & Jiroveanu, D. C. (2021). Entrepreneurial leadership and sustainable development- a systematic literature review. Sustainability, 13, 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111695
  63. Pinela, N., Guevara, R., & Armijos, M. (2022). Entrepreneurial leadership, work engagement, and innovative work behavior: The moderating role of gender. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 10(2), 19-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/764
  64. Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattrey, T., & Sardessai, R. (2005). Determinants of innovative work behaviour: development and test of an integrated model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 142-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00334.x
  65. Ranjan, S. (2018). Entrepreneurial leadership: a review of measures, antecedents, outcomes and moderators. Asian Social Science, 14(12), 104-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v14n12p104
  66. Renko, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial leadership. Forthcoming in Nature of Leadership. Edi. David V. Day and John Antonakis, Sage Publications
  67. Renko, M., El Tarabishy, A., Carsrud, A. L., & Brännback, M. (2015). Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. Journal of small business Management, 53(1), 54-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12086
  68. Robinson, K. (2008). Yaratıcılık Aklın Sınırlarını Aşmak. Kitap Yayınevi.
  69. Roomi, M. A., & Harrison, P. (2011). Entrepreneurial leadership: What is it and how should it be taught? International Review of Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 1-44.
  70. Sandybayev, A. (2019). Impact of effective entreprenerial leadership style on organizational performance: critical review. International Journal of Economics and Management, 1(1), 47-55.
  71. Sarwoko, E. (2020). Entrepreneurial leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of creative self-efficacy. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy, 23(2), 183-1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v23i2.2282
  72. Schein, E. H., & Bennis, W. G. (1965). Personal and organizational change through group methods: The Laboratory Approach. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2022.1011005
  73. Schubert, E. (2021). Creativity is optimal novelty and maximal positive affect: A new definition based on the spreading activation model. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.612379.
  74. Scott, S. G., & Bruce R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behaviour: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal,37(3), 580-607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
  75. Sözbilir, F. (2023). The impact of emotional intelligence and organizational identification on creativity performance. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 17, 254-268.
  76. Srirahayu, D. S., Ekowati, D., & Sridadi, A. R. (2023). Innovative work behavior in public organizations: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 9(2), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org.10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13557
  77. Stuart, R., & Abetti, P. A. (1987). Start-up ventures: Towards the prediction of initial success. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), 215-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90010-3
  78. Swaroop, P., & Dixit, V. (2017). Creativity, innovation and innovative behaviour at work: Clearing the conceptual confusion. International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences, 5(6), 459-464.
  79. Torralba, K. D., Jose, D., & Byrne, J. (2020). Psychological safety, the hidden curriculum and ambiguity in medicine. Clinical Rheumatology, 39, 667-677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-019-04889-4
  80. Tosun, B., & Kibaroğlu, G.G. (2023). Psikolojik güvenlik ikliminin iş tatminine etkisinde iş biçimlendirmenin rolü. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 58(1), 840-859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.03.2106
  81. Uzunsakal, E., & Yıldız, D. (2018). Alan araştırmalarında güvenilirlik testlerinin karşılaştırılması ve tarımsal veriler üzerine bir uygulama. Uygulamalı Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 14-28.
  82. Walia, C. (2019). A dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 237-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641787
  83. Wang, G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2004). Salesperson creative performance: Conceptualization, measurement, and nomological validity. Journal of Business Research, 57(8), 805-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00483-6
  84. Wanless, S. B. (2016). The role of psychological safety in human development. Research in Human Development, 13(1), 6-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2016.1141283
  85. West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(3), 355-424.
  86. Ximenes, M., Supartha, W. G., Manuati Dewi, I. G. A., & Sintaasih, D. K. (2019). Entrepreneurial leadership moderating high performance work system and employee creativity on employee performance. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1697512
  87. Yazıcıoğlu, Y., & Erdoğan, S. (2007). SPSS Uygulamalı bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Detay Yayıncılık.
  88. Yıldırım, A. E., & Ordu, A. (2025). Okul müdürlerinin girişimci liderlik davranışları ile öğretmenlerin yenilikçi iş davranışları arasındaki ilişki. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(1), 1825-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1593956
  89. Yuan, F., & Woodman, R.W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: the role of performance and image outcome expectations, Academia Management Journal, 53, 323-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.49388995
  90. Zainol, F. A., Daud, W. N. W., Abubakar, L. S., Shaari, H., & Halim, H. A. (2018). A Linkage between Entrepreneurial Leadership and SMEs Performance: An Integrated Review, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(4), 104–118. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i4/4000
  91. Zanden, P. A. C., Meijer, P. C., & Beghetto, R.A. (2020). A review study about creativity in adolescence: where is the social context? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100702
  92. Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2001), Enhancing creative performance: Effects of expected developmental assessment strategies and creative personality. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 151-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01044.x
  93. Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682-696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3069410
  94. Zorlu, K., & Tetik, F. (2018). Girişimci liderlik davranışının çalışan yaratıcılığına etkisi. The Journal of Selçuk University Social Sciences Institute, 39, 297-307.