Journals / Rize İlahiyat Dergisi / 2022 / Sayı: 22

Frame Semantics in the Arabic Translation of Philosophical Terminology

Felsefî Terminolojinin Arapça Tercümesinde Çerçeve Semantiği

Pages
425–447
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study argues that difficulties in translating philosophical terms represent epistemological barriers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine how philosophical terms are translated into Arabic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Examples of the study are taken from the specialized encyclopedia of Abdel Rahman Badawi (1996).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study argues that difficulties in translating philosophical terms represent epistemological barriers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dil Bilim · Terminoloji · Tercüme

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine how philosophical terms are translated into Arabic. It aims at discussing the problems arising from the epistemological difference between Western philosophical terms and their counterparts in Arabic in the degreeof reliance on cognitive frames. It focuses on the structure of terminological knowledge bases, which have a hidden network of semantic relations. Examples of the study are taken from the specialized encyclopedia of Abdel Rahman Badawi (1996). Thestudy utilizes Frame-Based Terminology Theory to analyze the translation of the philosophical terms in the encyclopedia. The study argues that difficulties in translating philosophical terms represent epistemological barriers.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı felsefî kavramların Arapçaya nasıl çevrildiğini tetkik etmektir. Bu inceleme, Batı menşeli felsefî terimler ile Arapça karşılıkları arasındaki epistemik farklılıktan kaynaklanan sorunları, bilişsel çerçevelere (cognitive frame) dayanan bir düzlemde ele almayı amaçlamakla birlikte gizli semantik ilişkiler ağına sahip olan terminolojik bilgi yapısının temellerine odaklanır. Çalışmadaki örnekler Abdurrahman Bedevi’nin felsefe alanına tahsis edilmiş ansiklopedisinden alınmıştır. Bu makale, ansiklopedideki felsefi terimlerin tercümelerini analiz etmek için Çerçeve Tabanlı Terminoloji Kuramı’na başvurmaktadır. Ayrıca, felsefî terimleri tercüme ederken karşılaşılan zorlukların epistemik engelleri temsil ettiğini iddia etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENTÜRK, Ç. A., DUMAN, Ç. O. N. (2022). Frame Semantics in the Arabic Translation of Philosophical Terminology. Rize İlahiyat Dergisi, Sayı: 22, 425–447. https://ajindex.com/articles/877540

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Arberry, A. J. “Some Plato in an Arabic Epitome”. The Islamic Quarterly 2 (ts.), 86-99. Bedevî, Abdurrahman. Aflutin ‘inda l-‘arab. Plotinus Apud Arabes. Theologia Aristotelis et Fragmenta Quae Supersunt. Kahire: Maktabat al-Nahda al-Misriyya, 1955. Bedevî, Abdurrahman. Al-Aflatuniyya al-muhdatha ‘ind al-‘Arab. Kahire: Maktabat al-Nahda al-Misriyya, 1955. Bedevî, Abdurrahman. Mevsûʿatü’l-felsefe. Beyrut: el-Müessetü’l-Arabiyye li’d-dirâse ve’n-neşr, I., 1984.
  2. Bekir, Savaş. “Film Çevirilerinde Altyazı Uygulamaları Çeviribilim Kapsamında Bir Çeviri midir?” Journal of International Social Research 12 (2019), 136-149.
  3. Black, D.L. Logic and Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Poetics in Medieval Arabic Philosophy. Leiden: Brill, 1990.
  4. Brague, R. Thémistius. Paraphrase de la Métaphysique d’Aristote (livre Lambda). ed. R. Brague. Vrin, 1999. Cabré, C. “Theories of terminology: Their Description, Prescription and Explanation”. Terminology. 163-199. John Benjamins, 2003.
  5. Daiber, H. “Salient trends of the Arabic Aristotle”. The Ancient Tradition in Christian and Islamic Hellenism (Studies on the Transmission of Greek Philosophy and Sciences dedicated to H.J. Drossaart Lulofs on his ninetieth birthday). ed. Kruk G. Endressand R. 29-41. Leiden, ts. Darbelnet, J. - Vinay, J. P. Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais. In: Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire. Geschiedenis (sedert de Oudheid), 38. Basım, 1960.
  6. Faber, P. vd. “Framing Terminology: A Process-Oriented Approach”. Meta 50 4 (2005).
  7. Faber, P. vd. “Linking images and words: the description of specialized concepts”. Interna-tional Journal of Lexicography 20 (2007), 39-65.
  8. Faber, P. “Process-oriented terminology management in the domain of Coastal Engineer-ing”. Terminology. 12/189-213., 2006.
  9. Faber, P. The Cognitive Shift in Terminology and Specialized Translation. MonTI, 2009.
  10. Fillmore, C. J. “Frame semantics”. The Linguistic Society of Korea. ed. Linguistics in the Morning Calm. 111-137. Seoul: Hanshin, ts. Fillmore, C. J. “Frame Semantics and the Nature of Language”. Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech. ed. J. Lancaster vd. 280. Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences, 1976.
  11. Fillmore, C. J. “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding”. Quaderni di Semantica 6/2 (1985), 222-254.
  12. Fillmore, C. J. - Atkins, S. “Towards a frame-based organization of the lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors”. Frames, Fields, and Contrast: New Essays in Semantics and Lexical Organization. ed. A. Lehrer - E. Kittay