Journals / Online Journal of Technology Addiction and Cyberbullying / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Perceived Social Media Addiction Differences by Student University Year

Üniversitenin Farklı Sınıflarına Göre Öğrenciler Arasında Algılanan Sosyal Medya Bağımlılığı Farklılıkları

Pages
72–85
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Future studies can qualitatively look at the reasons for these differences.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study implemented an ANOVA analysis of variance to deduce if there is a difference in perceived social media addiction between students in different university years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study examined each of the bachelor years separately to determine differences in perceived social media addiction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Future studies can qualitatively look at the reasons for these differences.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal medya bağımlılığı algısı · üniversite sınıflarına göre karşılaştırma · ANOVA

Abstract

The present study implemented an ANOVA analysis of variance to deduce if there is a difference in perceived social media addiction between students in different university years. The university years examined were the following: Freshman, Sophomore, Junior, and Senior. Increasingly, many researchers view the overuse of social media consumption as an addiction, similar to non-behavioral addictions. Moreover, the symptoms of behavioral addictions are also similar to non-behavioral addictions, such as drug addictions. It has been reported that social media addiction is on the rise. The present study examined each of the bachelor years separately to determine differences in perceived social media addiction. The present study adds to the literature in the area of social media due to utilizing data from the Gulf of the Middle East, an area where there is a lack of research. Freshman students had the highest mean for perceived social media addiction, with 75% thinking they are addicted to social media. A statistically significant effect was found utilizing an independent between-groups ANOVA, with 3.1% of the variance in belief of social media addiction accounted for by university year. A statistically significant result was found between certain university years, utilizing a Scheffe post-hoc test. Future studies can qualitatively look at the reasons for these differences.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, üniversitede farklı yıllara göre öğrenim gören öğrenciler arasında algılanan sosyal medya bağımlılığında bir fark olup olmadığını anlamak için bir ANOVA varyans analizi uygulanmıştır. Bu çalışmada birinci, ikinci, üçüncü ve dördüncü sınıflar ayrı ayrı incelenmiştir. Giderek artan bir şekilde, birçok araştırmacı sosyal medyanın aşırı kullanımını, davranışsal olmayan bağımlılıklara benzer bir bağımlılık olarak görmektedir. Ayrıca davranışsal bağımlılıkların belirtileri de uyuşturucu bağımlılığı gibi davranışsal olmayan bağımlılıklara benzemektedir. Genel olarak sosyal medya bağımlılığının arttığı görülmüştür. Bu çalışmada, algılanan sosyal medya bağımlılığındaki farklılıkları belirlemek için lisans yıllarının her biri ayrı ayrı incelemiştir. Ayrıca bu alanda yetirince araştırma yapılmayan Körfez Bölgesi'nden gelen verilerden yararlanılması nedeniyle, sosyal medya alanında literatüre katkıda bulunmaktadır. Birinci sınıf öğrencileri, algılanan sosyal medya bağımlılığı için en yüksek ortalamaya sahiptir. Ayrıca bunların yüzde 75'inin sosyal medyaya bağımlı oldukları düşünülmektedir. Gruplar arası bağımsız bir ANOVA kullanılarak, istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etki bulunmuştur. Sosyal medya bağımlılığı inancındaki varyansın yüzde 3.1'i üniversite yılına göre açıklanmaktadır. Scheffe post-hoc testi kullanılarak, belirli üniversite yılları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir sonuç bulunmuştur. Sonraki çalışmalarda bu farklılıkların nedenlerine niteliksel olarak bakılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALLAHVERDİ, F. Z. (2022). Perceived Social Media Addiction Differences by Student University Year. Online Journal of Technology Addiction and Cyberbullying, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 72–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/876191

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Allahverdi, F.Z. (2021a). A comparison of the different engineering majors in relation to perceived social media addiction. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 3(2), 197-201.
  2. Allahverdi, F.Z. (2021b). Social science students perceive themselves as more addicted to social media compared to science students. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 3(2), 197-201.
  3. Allahverdi, F.Z. (2021c). The relationship between the items of the social media disorder scale and perceived social media addiction. Current Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01314-x
  4. Allahverdi, F.Z. (2022a). Relationship between perceived social media addiction and social media applications frequency usage among university students. Psychology in the Schools, https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22662
  5. Allahverdi, F.Z. (2022b). Trait boredom and perceived social media addiction relationship. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(2), 5024-5036.
  6. Alnjadat, R., Hmaidi, M.M., Samha, T.E., Kilani, M.M., Hasswan, A.M. (2019). Gender variations in social media usage and academic performance among the students of University of Sharjah. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 14(4), p.390-394.
  7. Banerjee, S., & Hodge, A. (2007). Internet Usage: A Within Race Analysis. Race, Gender & Class, 14(3/4), 228–246. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41675301
  8. Cotten, S.R. (2008). Students’ technology use and the impacts on well-being. New Directions for Student Services, 124, 55-70.
  9. Davey, S., Davey, A., Raghav, S.K., Singh, J.V., Singh, N., Blachnio, A., & Przepiorkaa, A. (2018). Predictors and consequences of “Phubbing” among adolescents and youth in India: An impact evaluation study. Journal of Family and Community Medicine, 25(1), 35-42.
  10. Emerson, R. W. (2015).
  11. Convenience Sampling, Random Sampling, and Snowball Sampling: How Does Sampling Affect the Validity of Research? Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 109(2), 164–168.
  12. Eijnden, R.J.V.D., Lemmens, J.S., & Valkenburg, P.M. (2016). The social media disorder scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 478-487.
  13. Erfanmanesh, M., & Hosseini, E. (2015). Book review: Internet and social media addiction. Webology, 12(2), 1-3.
  14. Fatayer, J. (2008). Addiction Types: A Clinical Sociology Perspective. Journal of Applied Social Science, 2(1), 88–93. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23549240
  15. Gardner, J.M., & McKee, P.H. (2019). Social media use for pathologists of all ages. Ach Pathol Lab Med, 143, 282-286.
  16. Grau, S., Kleis