Journals / JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Environmental Effect Strengthened by The Neoliberal Transition Process

Neoliberal Geçiş Süreciyle Güçlenen Çevre Vurgusu

Pages
509–522
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, public intervention should be allowed at certain strategic points.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, from liberal point of view, the environmental damage caused by economic development is discussed, market tools offered for the solution of this damage are evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Liberalism and its assumptions are examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, public intervention should be allowed at certain strategic points.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Liberalizm · Ekolojik Ekonomi · Serbest Piyasa Çevreciliği

Abstract

In this study, from liberal point of view, the environmental damage caused by economic development is discussed, market tools offered for the solution of this damage are evaluated. Liberalism and its assumptions are examined. Hayek's liberalism is the building block of liberal teaching, has been reference within the scope of this study. Environmental issue was ignored in classical liberalism, was explained in the neoclassical economic paradigm, the tools used in the solution of environmental problems were researched. In this direction, Hayek's views on the environment are included. It has been understood how important the environment is for the continuity of the human race. Environmental elements should be priced under market conditions, property rights should be transferred. However, public intervention should be allowed at certain strategic points.

Özet

Bu çalışmada liberal ideolojik perspektiften, iktisadi gelişimin yarattığı çevresel tahribat ve tahribatın çözümü için sunulan piyasa araçları ele alınmıştır. Öncelikle kronolojik olarak çevre vurgusunun bu denli güçlenmesinin arka planı anlatılmıştır. Akabinde liberalizm ve liberalizmin teorik zeminini oluşturan varsayımlar irdelenmiştir. Klasik liberalizmde tasnif dışı bırakılan çevre, neoklasik iktisadi paradigma içerisinde anlatılmış ve çevresel sorunların çözümünde kullanılan araçlar değerlendirilmiştir. Hayek’in liberalizm anlayışı, liberal öğretinin yapı taşı iken bu çalışma kapsamında da önemli bir dayanak olmuştur. Bu doğrultuda Hayek’in çevre konusundaki görüşlerine yer verilmiştir. Nihai olarak çevrenin insan neslinin devamlılığı için ne denli önemli olduğu vurgulanmış; çevresel unsurların piyasa koşulları altında fiyatlanması ve mülkiyet haklarının devredilmesinin gereklilik iken belirli stratejik noktalarda kamusal müdahalenin meşru olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUĞAN, G., GENÇ, S. Y. (2022). Environmental Effect Strengthened by The Neoliberal Transition Process. JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 509–522. https://ajindex.com/articles/869049

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Acciona. (2020), What is climate change? (Erişim: 25.09.2022) https://www.acciona.com/climate-change/?_adin=02021864894
  2. Anderson, T. L. & Leal, D. R. (1991). Free Market Environmentalism: Hindsight And Foresight, Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 8(111), 111-134.
  3. Anderson, T. L. (2016). If Hayek and Coase Were Environmentalists: Linking Economics and Ecology. Supreme Court Economic Review, 23(1), 121-140.
  4. Andrew, J. & Cortese, C. (2013). Free market environmentalism and the neoliberal project: The case of the Climate Disclosure Standards Board. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(6), 397–409.
  5. Asserson, W. (2007). The Economists in the Garden: The Historical Roots of Free Market Environmentalism (Erişim: 1.09.2022), USA: Montana State University Departmant of History and Philosophy Professional Paper https://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/3924/Asserson_Final_n_Pro_P5__2_.pdf
  6. Baird C. W. (2006), Hayek on the Rule of Law and Unions (Erişim: 18.09.2022), https://fee.org/articles/hayek-on-the-rule-of-law-and-unions/
  7. Baştürk, M. F. (2014).
  8. Mülkiyet Problemi, Dışsallıklar ve Coasen Çözüm, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 21(1), 143-154.
  9. Bell, D. R. (2004). Creating Green Citizens? Political Liberalism And Environmental Education, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(1), 37-53.
  10. Bergh, J.C.J.M. (2001). Ecological Economics: Themes, Approaches and Differences with Environmental Economics. Regional Environmental Change, 2, 13-23. Buchanan J.M. & Stubblebine C. (1962). Externality. Economica, 29(116), 371-384.
  11. Burtan Doğan B. (2010). Klasik Liberal Teoride Bireyciliğin Yeri ve Önemi ile Bireycilik ve Kalkınma Sorunsalı Arasındaki Etkileşimler, Mevzuat Dergisi, 13(152). Corporate Watch (2016), A-Z of Green Capitalism, (Erişim: 25.09.2022) https://enoughisenough14.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Corporate-Watch-A-Z-of-Green-Capitalism.pdf
  12. Çelik, F. & Usta, S. (2010), Klasik Liberalizmde “Özgürlük” ve Liberalizmin Yerel Yönetimlere Bakışı, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24, 121-135.
  13. Çiftçi, A. (2020).
  14. Çevre Sorunları ve Liberalizm, Econder, 4(2), 462-478.
  15. Daly, E. H. (1992). Free‐market environmentalism: Turning a good servant into a bad master. Critical Review, 6(2-3), 171–183.
  16. Daly, G. & Giertz, F. (1975).
  17. Externalities, Extortion, and Efficiency. The American Economic Review, 65(5), 997-1001
  18. Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and Political Theory. London: UCL Press Ehrlich, P. R. & Holdren, J., P. (1971). Impact of Populati