Journals / EUropean Journal of Managerial Research (EUJMR) / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 11

Examination of Digital Leadership Concepts in Terms of Generations and Some Socıo-Demographıc Varıables/Dijital Liderlik Kavramının Kuşaklar Ve Bazı Sosyo-Demografik Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Pages
70–79
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Significant differences were also found in the digital leadership perceptions of the employees according to the variables of marital status, gender, and working time.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research, conducted throughout industrial enterprises in Konya, aimed to measure the digital leadership perceptions of employees in terms of generations and other socio-demographic variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, a questionnaire was presented to 400 participants, and for various reasons, only 292 results were used in the analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Significant differences were also found in the digital leadership perceptions of the employees according to the variables of marital status, gender, and working time.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Digital Leadership · Employees · Sosyo Demographic Variables

Özet

This research, conducted throughout industrial enterprises in Konya, aimed to measure the digital leadership perceptions of employees in terms of generations and other socio-demographic variables. It was analyzed whether the responses differed according to their demographic characteristics. Research data were obtained from employees working in Konya hydraulic, machinery, and metal industry enterprises by using the convenience sampling method. For this purpose, a questionnaire was presented to 400 participants, and for various reasons, only 292 results were used in the analysis. For the purpose of the research, descriptive statistics, normality tests, reliability analysis, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and T-test were performed. While significant differences were found in the perceptions of digital leadership between generations and the educational status of the employees, no meaningful differences were found in the perceptions of digital leadership between employees and managers. No significant difference was found from the questionnaires in the digital leadership perceptions of the participants, who were managers, according to their management level. Significant differences were also found in the digital leadership perceptions of the employees according to the variables of marital status, gender, and working time.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, A., TEKİN, İ. Ç., ALPARSLAN, P. K. (2022). Examination of Digital Leadership Concepts in Terms of Generations and Some Socıo-Demographıc Varıables/Dijital Liderlik Kavramının Kuşaklar Ve Bazı Sosyo-Demografik Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. EUropean Journal of Managerial Research (EUJMR), Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 11, 70–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/868091

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abbatiello, A., Knight, M., Philpot, S., & Roy, I. (2017). Rewriting the rules for the digital age: 2017 Deloitte Global Human Capital Trends. UK: Deloitte University Press.
  2. Ak, U. (2018). Endüstri 4.0 uygulamalarının makine verimliliğine etkisi ve beyaz eşya üretim sektöründe bir uygulama, (The effect of Industry 4.0 applications on machine efficiency and an application in the white goods production sector), (Master's Thesis), Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul. Akdemir, A., Konakay, G., & Demirkaya, H. (2014). Y kuşağının kariyer algısı, kariyer değişimi ve liderlik tarzı beklentilerinin araştırılması, (Investigation of the career perception, career change and leadership style expectations of the generation Y.) Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal of Economics and Management Research, 2 (2), p. 11-42
  3. Akdemir, M., Kılınç, U. (2014) Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal C.24, P.4, pp.793-811.
  4. Alan, H. & Koker, A. R. (2021). Stratejik Liderlikten Dijital Stratejik Liderliğe: Kavramsal ve Kuramsal Bir Tartışma. From Strategic Leadership to Digital Strategic Leadership: A Conceptual and Theoretical Discussion. Turkish Journal of Political Science, 4 (2), 235-252.
  5. Altan, O. Z. (2009), Social Policy Lessons, (3rd Edition), Anadolu University Press,
  6. Eskişehir Cetin Guler, E. (2003). Değişen Bilgi Teknolojilerinin İnsan Kaynağı Üzerine Etkileri. The Effects of Changing Information Technologies on Human Resources. (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Ege University Institute of Social Sciences. Ghufron, G. (2018). Revolusi Industry 4.0: Tantangan, Peluangdan Solusi bagi Dunia Pandidikan. In Seminar Nasional from Diskusi Panel Multidiscipline Hasil Penelitian from Pengabdian Kepada Masarakat1 Gorkun, O. F.: Dördüncü Endüstri Devrimi Endüstri 4.0, Fourth Industrial Revolution Industry 4.0, 2nd ed., Istanbul, Beta, 2017.
  7. Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W. and Helbig, J. “Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative Industrie 4.0, Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group”, National Academy of Science and Engineering, Frankfurt, 2013
  8. Metin, S. (2019). İşletmelerin dijital dönüşüm (endüstri 4.0) farkındalık ve algı düzeyinin değerlendirilmesi, Evaluation of digital transformation (industry 4.0) awareness and perception level of businesses: Example of Elazig OI