Journals / İnsan ve İnsan / 2023 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 35

Has the COVID-19 Pandemic Changed Turkey’s Performance Against The OECD in Regards to Green Growth Indicators?

COVID-19 Pandemisi Türkiye’nin Yeşil Büyüme Göstergeleri Bakımından OECD Karşısındaki Performansını Değiştirdi mi?

Pages
29–46
Publication Date
2023-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While Turkey was in the same group with countries such as Chile and Colombia before the pandemic, it started to be in the same group with countries such as Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Australia, Luxemburg and Finland, which have significant renewable energy potential that contributes to the improvement of environmental quality after the pandemic.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Pandemics cause societies to change in many ways, including political, economic, social, cultural and environmental.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The possible effects of these changes are the decrease in production and consumption, decrease in income, increase in unemployment, decrease in trade, decrease in energy demand and environmental pollution.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While Turkey was in the same group with countries such as Chile and Colombia before the pandemic, it started to be in the same group with countries such as Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Australia, Luxemburg and Finland, which have significant renewable energy potential that contributes to the improvement of environmental quality after the pandemic.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yeşil büyüme · COVID-19 · Pandemi

Abstract

Pandemics cause societies to change in many ways, including political, economic, social, cultural and environmental. The possible effects of these changes are the decrease in production and consumption, decrease in income, increase in unemployment, decrease in trade, decrease in energy demand and environmental pollution. Depending on the development level of the countries, countries may be affected differently from these developments. The COVID-19 pandemic has also significantly affected the global economy. The COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect the Turkish economy. The aim of this study is to determine whether the COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on Turkey’s green growth performance against the OECD by applying cluster analysis. Cluster analysis findings using 46 green growth indicators showed that the country group including Turkey changed after the COVID-19 pandemic. While Turkey was in the same group with countries such as Chile and Colombia before the pandemic, it started to be in the same group with countries such as Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Australia, Luxemburg and Finland, which have significant renewable energy potential that contributes to the improvement of environmental quality after the pandemic.

Özet

Pandemiler başta politik, ekonomik, sosyal, kültürel ve çevresel olmak üzere pek çok açıdan toplumların değişim sergilemelerine neden olmaktadırlar. Bu değişimlerin muhtemel etkileri üretim ve tüketimin gerilemesi, gelirin azalması, işsizliğin artması, ticaretin düşmesi, enerji talebi ve çevre kirliliğinin azalmasıdır. COVID-19 pandemisi de küresel ekonomiyi anlamlı bir şekilde etkilemiştir. Ülkeler, gelişmişlik düzeylerine göre bu gelişmelerden farklı şekilde etkilenmiştir. COVID-19 pandemisi Türkiye ekonomisini de etkilemeye devam etmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, COVID-19 pandemisinin Türkiye’nin OECD karşısındaki yeşil büyüme performansında bir etkiye yol açıp açmadığını kümeleme analizi uygulayarak belirlemektir. 46 yeşil büyüme göstergesi kullanılarak uygulanan kümeleme analizi bulguları, Türkiye’nin dahil olduğu ülke grubunun COVID-19 pandemisi sonrasında değiştiğini göstermiştir. Türkiye pandemi öncesinde Şili ve Kolombiya gibi ülkeler ile aynı grupta yer alırken, pandemi sonrasında çevresel kalitenin iyileştirilmesine katkı sunan önemli yenilenebilir enerji potansiyeline sahip Danimarka, İsveç, Norveç, Avustralya, Lüksemburg ve Finlandiya gibi ülkeler ile aynı grupta yer almaya başlamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

POLAT, M. A., ERGÜN, S. (2023). Has the COVID-19 Pandemic Changed Turkey’s Performance Against The OECD in Regards to Green Growth Indicators?. İnsan ve İnsan, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 35, 29–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/860308

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Agboola, Mary Oluwatoyin, Festus Victor Bekun ve Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente. “Implications of Social Isolation in Combating COVID-19 Outbreak in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Its Consequences on the Carbon Emissions Reduction”. Sustainability, 13/16 (2021): 9476. Al, İbrahim. “Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma ve Yeşil Ekonomi: Türkiye İçin Bir Endeks Önerisi”. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12/1 (2019): 112-124.
  2. Aljadani, Abdussalam, Hassen Toumi, Said Toumi, Mosbah Hsini ve Basma Jallali. “Investigation of the N-Shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve for COVID-19 Mitigation in the KSA”. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28/23 (2021): 29681-29700.
  3. Alpar, Reha. Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Yöntemler. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık, 2021.
  4. Arisman, Arisman. “COVID-19 and the Environmental Impact in Indonesia”. JICA Ogata Sadako Research Institute for Peace and Development Human Security and the Practices of Empowerment in East Asia Research Project Working Report, 2021.
  5. Atik, Hayriye ve Fatma Ünlü. “Endüstri 4.0’a Dönüşüm Süreci: Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Performansı Üzerine Ampirik Bir Analiz”. Marmara Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, 27/1 (2019): 145-168.
  6. Atik, Hayriye ve Melike Atay Polat. Ekonomik Kalkınma ve Kadınların Elde Ettikleri Kazanımlar: Türkiye’deki İstatistiki Bölge Birimleri Üzerine Bir Analiz. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık, 2017.
  7. Atik, Hayriye ve Sevgi Elverdi. “Türkiye’de ve Avrupa Birliği’ne Üye Ülkelerde Kadınların Göreli Ekonomik Kalkınma Düzeyleri”. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Teori, Güncel Araştırmalar ve Yeni Eğilimler. Der., Yüksel Akay Unvan. Montenegro: IVPE, 2020.
  8. Baky Haskuee, Mortaza ve Ali Asgary. “Environmental Risk of COVID-19 Recovery”. Energy & Environment, (2022).
  9. Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel, Oana M. Driha, Festus Victor Bekun, Avik Sinha ve Festus Fatai Adedoyin. “Consequences of COVID-19 on the Social Isolation of the Chinese Economy: Accounting for the Role of Reduction in Carbon Emissions”. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 13/12 (2020): 1439-1451.
  10. Barbier, Edward. B. “Greening the Post-Pandemic Recovery in the G20”. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76/4 (2020): 685-703. Cárcel-Carrasco, Javier, Manuel Pascual-Guillamón ve Jaime Langa-Sanchis. “Analysis of the Effect of COVID-19 on Air Pollution: Perspective of the Spanish Case”. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28/27 (2021): 36880-36893.
  11. Fahria, Izma ve Ineu Sulistiana. “Vector Error Correction Model to Analyze Energy Uses, Environmental Q