SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: XXI - Sayı: 1-2

A NEW APPROACH TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: “RESTORATIVE JUSTICE” MECHANISM AS A SUBSIDIARY SYSTEM

CEZA ADALETİ SİSTEMİNE YENİ BİR YAKLAŞIM: TAMAMLAYICI BİR SİSTEM OLARAK “ONARICI ADALET” MEKANİZMASI

Sercan TOKDEMİR
Pages
75–114
Publication Date
2017-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, restorative justice will be discussed within a critical and comparative point of view dealing with historical process, definition, mentality, applied modals, the main principles and aims of it.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main aim of this study is to reveal the emergence of restorative justice as a new approach to conventional criminal justice and a supplementary discipline for this system with a comparative intersystem.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main aim of this study is to reveal the emergence of restorative justice as a new approach to conventional criminal justice and a supplementary discipline for this system with a comparative intersystem.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, restorative justice will be discussed within a critical and comparative point of view dealing with historical process, definition, mentality, applied modals, the main principles and aims of it.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Onarıcı adalet · yeniden bütünleştirici kınama · mağdur-fail arabuluculuğu

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to reveal the emergence of restorative justice as a new approach to conventional criminal justice and a supplementary discipline for this system with a comparative intersystem. In this context, restorative justice will be discussed within a critical and comparative point of view dealing with historical process, definition, mentality, applied modals, the main principles and aims of it.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı onarıcı adalet anlayışının geleneksel ceza adaleti sistemine yeni bir yaklaşım olarak ortaya çıkışını ve bu sistemi tamamlayıcı bir disiplin olduğunu sistemler arası bir mukayese ile ortaya koymaktır. Bu çerçevede, onarıcı adaletin geçirdiği tarihsel süreç, tanımı, düşünce yapısı, uygulanan modelleri, temel ilke ve hedefleri eleştirel ve mukayeseli bir bakış açısıyla ele alınacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOKDEMİR, S. (2017). A NEW APPROACH TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: “RESTORATIVE JUSTICE” MECHANISM AS A SUBSIDIARY SYSTEM. Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: XXI - Sayı: 1-2, 75–114. https://ajindex.com/articles/851330

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. AKTAŞ, Sururi; Hayek'in Hukuk ve Adalet Teorisi, Liberte Yayınları 2011.
  2. ARTUK, Mehmet Emin / GÖKCEN, Ahmet / YENİDÜNYA, Caner; Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Adalet Yayınevi, 8. Baskı, Ankara, 2014.
  3. BAYTAZ, Abdullah Batuhan, "Onarıcı Adalete Genel Bir Bakış", İÜHFM C. LXXI, S. 1, 2013, s. 117-130.
  4. BRAİTHWAİTE, John; "Restorative Justice: Assessing Optimistic and Pessimistic Accounts", Crime and Justice, Vol. 25 (1999), s.1-27.
  5. BRAİTHWAİTE, John; "Shame and Criminal Justice", Canadian Journal of Criminology, July 2000, s. 281-298.
  6. BRAİTHWAİTE, John; "Settings Standards for Restorative Justice", The Centre for Crime and Ustice Studies, 42: 2002, s. 563-577.
  7. CARDER, Kenneth L. "Resources for Restorative Justice", Center for Christian Ethics, 2012, s. 89-93.
  8. ÇEBİ, Sezgin Seymen, Sosyal Adalet Tarihsel ve Kuramsal Bir Bakış, XII Levha yayınları, 1. Baskı,
  9. İstanbul, Ekim 2012, s. 27. ÇELİK, Özlem/TOKDEMİR, Sercan; "Kamu Davası ve Toplumsal Algılar", Prof. Dr. Feridun Yenisey’e Armağan, Beta Yayınları,
  10. Cilt I, Ekim 2014,
  11. İstanbul.
  12. ESENER, Turhan; Hukuka Giriş, 11. Baskı,
  13. Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul, Ocak 2015.
  14. GAUDREAULT, Arlene; "The Limits of Restorative Justice”, Proceedings of the Symposium of the École Nationale De La Magistrature, Paris: Édition Dalloz. Leído en http://www. victimsweek. gc. ca/pub/arlg_1. html, 2005, s. 1-10.
  15. GAVRİELİDES, Theo; "Restorative Justice Theory and Practice: Addressing the Discrepancy", European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, affiliated with the United Nations (HEUNI) Part 2007, s. 29-36 & 52-80.
  16. GÖKPINAR, Mahmut; “Adalet Teorileri Perspektifinden 1982 Anayasamız", TBB Dergisi, Sayı: 77, 2008, s. 214-235.
  17. GÜRİZ, Adnan; Hukuk Felsefesi, 11. Baskı, Ankara 2015.
  18. GÜRİZ, Adnan; “Adalet Kavramı”, s. 13. Makale için bkz.http://www.anayasa.gov.tr/files/pdf/anayasa_yargisi/anyarg7/adnan.pdf Erişim tarihi: 29.04.2015, s. 14. HASCALL, Susan C.; “Restorative Justice in Islam: Should Qisas Be Considered a Form of Restorative Justice”, Berkeley J. Middle E. & Islamic Law, 4: 35, s. 35-78.
  19. HUNSBERGER, Adam,"Restorative Justice in Theory," Undergraduate Transitional Justice Review: Vol. 2013 (4): Issuse: 1, Article 2, s. 2-18. http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/undergradtjr/vol4/iss1/2.
  20. HOYLE, Carolyn, "Policing and Restorative Justice", in G. Johnstone, and D. Van Ness (eds), Handbook of Restorative Justice, Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing, Chapter 16: s. 292-311.
  21. HUDSON, Barbara; "Restorative Justice and Gendered Violence: Diversion or Effe