Journals / PressAcademia Procedia / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURES AND IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Pages
213–216
Publication Date
2018-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also by this way, this study makes a better understanding of corporate self-presentational behaviours on social media and the effecf of stakeholder perception among social media users.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose- The main purpose of this study is to understand companies’ sustainability disclosures on social media from the perspectives of impression management tactics at organizational level.Methodology- This study is theoretical to meet the requriements about call for studies of the corporate use of social media by looking at sustainability mechanism and organizational impression management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Also, it has a desire to make a preposition about further qualitative and quantitative studies in Turkish organizations by analyzing corporate social media accountsFindings- Companies want to give the impression of being a sustainable actor by balancing the favorable and unfavorable information they give to their stakeholders.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also by this way, this study makes a better understanding of corporate self-presentational behaviours on social media and the effecf of stakeholder perception among social media users.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sustainability disclosures · impression management · assertive tactics

Abstract

Purpose- The main purpose of this study is to understand companies’ sustainability disclosures on social media from the perspectives of impression management tactics at organizational level.Methodology- This study is theoretical to meet the requriements about call for studies of the corporate use of social media by looking at sustainability mechanism and organizational impression management. Also, it has a desire to make a preposition about further qualitative and quantitative studies in Turkish organizations by analyzing corporate social media accountsFindings- Companies want to give the impression of being a sustainable actor by balancing the favorable and unfavorable information they give to their stakeholders. For this reason, organizations can use sustainability narratives as a way to formalize their stakeholders’ expectations or manipulate their perceptions on social media. Social media are among the best ways to communicate with the stakeholders of companies. They allow organizations to engage in timely and direct contact at low cost and with higher levels of efficiency than traditional communication tools. Bu using impression management tactics as assertive and defensive, they can project a positive impression of their social and environmental performance on social media platform.Conclusion- Our theoretical suggestions demonstrate that social media provides a favorable communication environment to the sustainable firms. Also by this way, this study makes a better understanding of corporate self-presentational behaviours on social media and the effecf of stakeholder perception among social media users.

🔖

Cite This Article

ESEN, E., CALİSKAN, A. O. (2018). SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURES AND IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT ON SOCIAL MEDIA. PressAcademia Procedia, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 213–216. https://ajindex.com/articles/842289

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Bansal, P., Kistruck, G. (2006). Seeing is (not) believing: managing the impressions of the firm’s commitment to the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 165⎼180. Benthaus, J., Risius, M., Beck, R. (2016). Social media management strategies for organizational impression management and their effect on public perception. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 25(2), 127-139.
  2. Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H. (1999). Measuring impression management in organizations: a scale development based on the Jones and Pittman taxonomy. Organizational Research Methods, 2(2), 187⎼206. Brennan, N. M., Guillamon-Saorin, E., Pierce, A. (2009). Impression management: developing and illustrating a scheme of analysis for narrative disclosures-A methodological note. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(5), 789⎼832. Brennan, N. M., Merkl-Davies, D. M. (2013). Accounting narratives and impression management. The Routledge companion to accounting communication, 109. Chen, Y. Y., Fang, W. (2008), The moderating effect of impression management on the organizational politics–relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 263⎼277. Conlon, D. E., Murray, N. M. (1996). Customer perceptions of corporate responses to product complaints: the role of explanations. Academy of management journal, 39(4), 1040-1056.
  3. Guadagno, R. E., Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Gender differences in impression management in organizations: a qualitative review. Sex Roles, 56(7-8), 483-494.
  4. Highhouse, S., Brooks, M. E., Gregarus, G. (2009). An organizational impression management perspective on the formation of corporate reputations. Journal of Management. 35(6), 1481⎼1493. Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management–new perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of business ethics, 27(1-2), 55-68.
  5. Kaplan, A. M., Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.
  6. Kaplan, A. M., Haenlein, M. (2012). Social media: back to the roots and back to the future. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 14(2), 101–104.
  7. Lee, K., Oh, W. Y., Kim, N. (2013). Social media for socially responsible firms: analysis of Fortune 500’s Twitter profiles and their CSR/CSIR ratings. Journal of business ethics, 118(4), 791-806.
  8. Lillqvist, E., Louhiala-Salminen, L. (2014). Facing Facebook impression management strategies in company–consumer interactions. Journal