SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Family Counseling and Education / 2017 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Cognitive and Metacognitive Structures and Processes in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

Neslihan ARICI ÖZCAN
Pages
20–38
Publication Date
2017-07-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus in this study implicated further studies taking consideration both metacognitive structure and metacognitive process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study aimed to review and discuss the cognitive and metacognitive structures and processes in the etiology Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD).
📊
Key Findings & Data:At the other hand studies concerned cognitive process research cognitive deficient, information processing problems or biases and use performance measurements.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus in this study implicated further studies taking consideration both metacognitive structure and metacognitive process.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:OCD · Cognitive · Metacognitive Level

Abstract

The present study aimed to review and discuss the cognitive and metacognitive structures and processes in the etiology Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Studies concerned cognitive structures research dysfunctional thoughts and primary negative appraisals in OCD and use self-report inventories. At the other hand studies concerned cognitive process research cognitive deficient, information processing problems or biases and use performance measurements. However studies at the cognitive level have not explained OCD in an effective way, because of not using proper measurements, properties of participants and inconsistent results. Thus studies at the metacognitive level which focuses on appraisals, monitoring and control of cognitive structures and process. Metacognitive structure studies explain OCD secondary negative appraisal and metacognition; which appraise, monitor and control cognitive structure and process by using self-report inventories. Metacognitive process studies explain OCD executive function; which monitor control, cognitive process; and use performance measurements. In literature it is stated that metacognitive level studies explain OCD in more effective way than cognitive level studies. However metacognitive structure studies and process studies have some problems because of having same results with using different measurements, and operational definitions. By the way there is confusion in literature. Thus in this study implicated further studies taking consideration both metacognitive structure and metacognitive process.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZCAN, N. A. (2017). Cognitive and Metacognitive Structures and Processes in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Journal of Family Counseling and Education, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 20–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/835654

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abramovitch, A., & Cooperman, A. (2015). The cognitiveneuropsychology of obsessive-compulsive disorder: Acritical review. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive andRelated Disorders, 5,24–36.
  2. Abramowitz, J. S, & Houts, A. C. (2005). Concepts and controversies in obsessive compulsive disorder. Rochester: Springer. Abramowitz, J. S., Whiteside, S., Kalsy, S. A., & Tolin, D. F. (2003). Thought control strategies in obsessivecompulsive disorder: a replication and extension. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 529–540.
  3. Ahmari, S. E., Eich, T., Cebenoyan, D., Smith, E. E., & Blair Simpson, H. (2014). Assessing neurocognitive function in psychiatric disorders: A roadmap for enhancing consensus. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 115, 10–20.
  4. Algom, D., Chajut, E. & Lev, S. (2004). A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 323–338. American Psikiyatri Birliği. Ruhsal Bozuklukların Tanısal ve Sayımsal Elkitabı, Beşinci Baskı (DSM-5), (2013). Tanı Ölçütleri Başvuru el kitabı (çeviri ed. E Köroğlu) Ankara,
  5. Hekimler Yayın Birliği. Amir, N., Freshman, M., Ramsey, B., Neary, E., & Brigidi, B. (2001). Thought-action fusion in individuals with OCD symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 765–776.
  6. Arntz, A. Voncke, M., & Goosen, A. C. (2007). Responsibility and obsessive–compulsive disorder: An experimental test. Behaviour Research and Therapy 45, 425–435.
  7. Ashbaugh, A. R. & Radomsky, A. S. (2007). Attentional focus during repeated checking influences memory but not metamemory. Cognitive Therapy Research, 31, 291-306.
  8. Bienvenu, O.J,, Samuels, J.F., & Wuyek, L. A, et al. (2012). Is obsessive compulsive disorder an anxiety disorder, and what, if any, are spectrum conditions? A family study perspective. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1–13.
  9. Bannon, S., Gonsalvez, C.G., Croft, R. C. & Boyce, P. M. (2006). Executive functions in obsessive–compulsive disorder: state or trait deficits? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 40, 1031–1038.
  10. Boelen, P. A., & Carleton, R. N. (2012). Intolerance of uncertainty, hypochondriacal concerns, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and worry. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 200(3), 208–229.
  11. Bohne, A., Savage, C.R., Deckersbach, T., Keuthen, N.J., Jenike, M.A., Tuschen-Caffier, B. & Wilhelm, S. (2005). Visuospatial abilities, memory, and executive functioning in trichotillomania and obsessive–compulsive disorder. Journal of Clinical and Ex