SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

The Examination of Studies Using Bibliometric Analysis in the Context of Emotional Intelligence and Leadership Relation

Duygusal Zekâ ve Liderlik İlişkisi Bağlamındaki Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analiz ile İncelenmesi

Mustafa HOTAMIŞLI
Dilek EFE
Pages
101–121
Publication Date
2015-08-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of this research, it has been determined that in the studies, the mostly prefered type of source, with the persentence of 42, are articles, in the studies totally 2256 resources are used and five percent of these resources belong to Daniel Goleman, one of the most wellknown names in the field of emotional intelligence and the most important thing is that the number of studies examing the relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership is very low.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, 25 studies, in which emotional intelligence and leadershipvariables were dealed with together and the relationship of these two variables were studied and done in the years of 2001 and 2013, has been examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study conducted in the type of research using thebibliometric analysis techniques, one of the qualitative research techniques, the bibliometric profile of 2 phd thesis, 17 masters degree thesis, two of which haven’t been published yet, and 6 articles has been examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of this research, it has been determined that in the studies, the mostly prefered type of source, with the persentence of 42, are articles, in the studies totally 2256 resources are used and five percent of these resources belong to Daniel Goleman, one of the most wellknown names in the field of emotional intelligence and the most important thing is that the number of studies examing the relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership is very low.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Duygusal Zekâ · Liderlik · Bibliyometrik Literatür Taraması

Abstract

In this research, 25 studies, in which emotional intelligence and leadershipvariables were dealed with together and the relationship of these two variables were studied and done in the years of 2001 and 2013, has been examined. In the study conducted in the type of research using thebibliometric analysis techniques, one of the qualitative research techniques, the bibliometric profile of 2 phd thesis, 17 masters degree thesis, two of which haven’t been published yet, and 6 articles has been examined. As a result of this research, it has been determined that in the studies, the mostly prefered type of source, with the persentence of 42, are articles, in the studies totally 2256 resources are used and five percent of these resources belong to Daniel Goleman, one of the most wellknown names in the field of emotional intelligence and the most important thing is that the number of studies examing the relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership is very low.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, duygusal zekâ ve liderlik değişkenlerinin birlikte ele alındığı, bu iki değişkenin ilişkisinin incelendiği, 2001-2013 yılları arasında gerçekleştirilen 25 çalışma incelenmiştir. Nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden bibliyometrik analiz tekniği kullanılarak tarama modelinde gerçekleştirilen çalışmada; 2 doktora tezi, 2’si yayımlanmamış 17 yüksek lisans tezi ve 6 makalenin bibliyometrikprofili incelenmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda; çalışmalarda % 42 ile en fazla tercih edilen kaynak türünün makaleler olduğu, tüm çalışmalarda toplam 2256 kaynak kullanıldığı ve bu kaynaklardan % 5’inin duygusal zekânın önemli isimlerinden Daniel Goleman’a ait olduğu, en önemlisi de duygusal zekâ ve liderlik ilişkisinin incelendiği çalışma sayısının oldukça az olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

HOTAMIŞLI, M., EFE, D. (2015). The Examination of Studies Using Bibliometric Analysis in the Context of Emotional Intelligence and Leadership Relation. Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 101–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/828140

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Al, U. (2008). Türkiye’nin Bilimsel Yayın Politikası: Atıf Dizinlerine Dayalı Bibliyometrik Bir Yaklaşım. Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi,
  2. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  3. Al, U. Soydal, İ. ve Yalçın, H. (2010). Bibliyometrik Özellikleri Açısından Bilig’in Değerlendirilmesi. BiligDergisi, 55 (1), 1-20.
  4. Al, U. ve Coştur, R. (2007). Türk Psikoloji Dergisi'nin Bibliyometrik Profili. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 21 (2), 1-24.
  5. Al, U. ve Tonta, Y. (2004). Atıf Analizi: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphanecilik Bölümü Tezlerinde Atıf Yapılan Kaynaklar. Bilgi Dünyası Dergisi, 5 (1), 19-47. Association of College & Research Libraries – ACRL Scholarly Communications Committee. (2003). Principles and Strategies For The Reform Of Scholarly Communication http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/principlesstrategies erişildi. 1. 5 Ocak 2014 tarihinde adresinden Atılgan, D., Atakan, C. ve Bulut. B. (2008). Türkçe Kütüphanecilik Dergilerinin Atıf Analizi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği Dergisi, 22 (4), 392-413.
  6. BASS, Bernard M. (1990), BassandStodgil’sHandbookOf Leadership.Free Pres: USA. Birinci, H. G. (2008). TurkishJournalOf Chemistry’ninBibliyometrik Analizi. Bilgi Dünyası Dergisi, 9 (2), 348-369.
  7. Borgman, C. L. ve Furner, J. (2002). ScholarlyCommunicationandBibliometrics. AnnualReviewOf Information ScienceandTechnology, 36 (1), 2-72.
  8. Budd, J. (1986). CharacteristicsOf WrittenScholarshipInAmericanLiterature: A CitationStudy. Library andInformation ScienceResearch, 8 (2), 189-211.
  9. Cullars, J. (1985). CharacteristicsOf TheMonographicLiteratureOf British andAmericanLiteraryStudies. CollegeandResearch Libraries, 46 (6), 511-522.
  10. Cullars, J. (1992). CitationCharacteristicsOf MonographsInTheFineArts. The Library Quarterly, 62 (3), 325-342.
  11. Cullars, J. (1998). CitationCharacteristicsOf English-Language MonographsInPhilosophy. Library &Information ScienceResearch, 20 (1), 41-68.
  12. Çiçek, D. ve Kozak N. (2012). Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi’nde Yayımlanan Hakem Denetimli Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Profili. Türk Kütüphaneciliği Dergisi, 26 (4), 734-756.
  13. Dutt, B.,Garg, K. C. ve Bali, A. (2003). ScientometricsOf The International JournalScientometrics. Scientometrics, 56 (1), 81-93.
  14. Ece, A. S. ve Tatar, C. C. (2012). Bilimsel Dergilerdeki Müzik Makalelerinin Bibliyometrik Profili. Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 30 (Mayıs-Haziran), 1-16.
  15. Goleman, D. (1996). Duygusal Zekâ. Varlık Yayınları:
  16. İstanbul.
  17. Heinzkill, R. (1980). CharacteristicsOf ReferencesInSelectedScholarlyEnglish LiteraryJour