Journals / Türk Kadın Sağlığı ve Neonatoloji Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Investigation of psychometric properties of the breast engorgement scale.

Meme dolgunluğu değerlendirme skalasının psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi

Pages
67–71
Publication Date
2021-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Validity of the scale; Linguistic equivalence, content validity and criterion-related validity, reliabilitywere evaluated by test-retest analysis for time invariance.Results: According to the correlation analysis performed to determine the relationship between MDDS and SAS, itwas determined that there was a significant and moderate relationship between MDDS and SAS (r= 0.602, p<0.001).According to the test-retest analysis for time invariance, the correlation between the two treatments was found to be0.92 (p <0.001).Conclusion: According to the results of linguistic equivalence, content validity, criterion-related validity and timeinvariance analysis, it was determined that the MDDS, which was adapted for the first time in breastfeeding mothers inTurkish society, is a valid and reliable measurement tool.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study was planned to examine the psychometric properties of the "Six-Pointed Breast Engorgement Scale".Material and Method: Research data were collected between November 2020 and April 2021 with 113 mothers whoagreed to participate in the study using the Participant Information Form, Six- Pointed Breast Engorgement Scale andNumerical Pain Scale.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Aim: This study was planned to examine the psychometric properties of the "Six-Pointed Breast Engorgement Scale".Material and Method: Research data were collected between November 2020 and April 2021 with 113 mothers whoagreed to participate in the study using the Participant Information Form, Six- Pointed Breast Engorgement Scale andNumerical Pain Scale.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Validity of the scale; Linguistic equivalence, content validity and criterion-related validity, reliabilitywere evaluated by test-retest analysis for time invariance.Results: According to the correlation analysis performed to determine the relationship between MDDS and SAS, itwas determined that there was a significant and moderate relationship between MDDS and SAS (r= 0.602, p<0.001).According to the test-retest analysis for time invariance, the correlation between the two treatments was found to be0.92 (p <0.001).Conclusion: According to the results of linguistic equivalence, content validity, criterion-related validity and timeinvariance analysis, it was determined that the MDDS, which was adapted for the first time in breastfeeding mothers inTurkish society, is a valid and reliable measurement tool.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:kültürel uyarlama · meme dolgunluğu · psikometrik özellik

Abstract

Aim: This study was planned to examine the psychometric properties of the "Six-Pointed Breast Engorgement Scale".Material and Method: Research data were collected between November 2020 and April 2021 with 113 mothers whoagreed to participate in the study using the Participant Information Form, Six- Pointed Breast Engorgement Scale andNumerical Pain Scale. Validity of the scale; Linguistic equivalence, content validity and criterion-related validity, reliabilitywere evaluated by test-retest analysis for time invariance.Results: According to the correlation analysis performed to determine the relationship between MDDS and SAS, itwas determined that there was a significant and moderate relationship between MDDS and SAS (r= 0.602, p<0.001).According to the test-retest analysis for time invariance, the correlation between the two treatments was found to be0.92 (p <0.001).Conclusion: According to the results of linguistic equivalence, content validity, criterion-related validity and timeinvariance analysis, it was determined that the MDDS, which was adapted for the first time in breastfeeding mothers inTurkish society, is a valid and reliable measurement tool.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma, “Meme Dolgunluğu Değerlendirme Skalası”nın psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi amacıylaplanlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırma verileri Kasım 2020- Nisan 2021 tarihleri arasında araştırmaya katılmayı kabul eden 113anne ile Katılımcı Bilgi Formu, Meme Dolgunluğu Değerlendirme Skalası (MDDS) ve Sayısal Ağrı Skalası (SAS) kullanılaraktoplanmıştır. Ölçeğin geçerliliği; dilsel eşdeğerlilik, kapsam geçerliliği ve ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlilik, güvenilirliği ise zamanagöre değişmezlik için test tekrar test analizi yapılarak değerlendirilmiştir.Bulgular: MDDS ile SAS arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemek için yapılan korelasyon analizine göre, MDDS ile SAS arasında (r=0,602, p<0,001) anlamlı ve orta düzeyde bir ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir. Zamana göre değişmezlik için yapılan test tekrartest analizine göre iki uygulama arasındaki korelasyonun 0,92 (p <0,001) olduğu saptanmıştır.Sonuç: Dilsel eşdeğerlik, kapsam geçerliği, ölçüt bağlantılı geçerlik ve zaman göre değişmezlik analizi sonucuna göre,ilk defa Türk toplumundaki emziren annelerde uyarlama çalışması yapılan MDDS’nin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracıolduğu saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAYA, M., KÖRÜKCÜ, Ö. (2021). Investigation of psychometric properties of the breast engorgement scale.. Türk Kadın Sağlığı ve Neonatoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 67–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/811665

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Padmasree S, Linda V, Aswathy S. Effectiveness of prenatal teaching on prevention of breast engorgement. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2017; 6:3927-3931.
  2. Pustotina, O. Management of mastitis and breast engorgement in breastfeeding women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med.2016; 29:3121-3125.
  3. Kamali Moradzade M, Ahmadi M, Heshmat R, Akbarzade Baghban A. Comparing the effect of acupressure and intermittent compress on the severity of breast hyperemia in lactating women. The Horizon of Medical Sciences, 2013; 18:155-160.
  4. Morrison AH, Gentry R, Anderson J. Mothers' reasons for early breastfeeding cessation. MCN: Am J Matern Child Nurs 2019; 44:325-330.
  5. Karaçam Z, Sağlık M. Emzirme sorunları ve sorunlara ilişkin yapılan girişimler: Türkiye'de yapılan çalışmalara dayalı bir sistematik derleme. Turk Pediatri Ars 2018; 53:134-148.
  6. Zakarija-Grkovic I, Stewart F. Treatments for breast engorgement during lactation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 18:9. Wong BB, Chan YH, Leow MQH, et al. Application of cabbage leaves compared to gel packs for mothers with breast engorgement: Randomised controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2017;76:92-99. Australian Breastfeeding Association. (2019). Engorgement. https://www.breastfeeding.asn.au/bf-info/commonconcerns%E2%80%93mum/engorgement (accessed 08/08/2021).
  7. Hill PD, Humenick SS. The occurrence of breast engorgement. J Hum Lact 1994; 10:79-86.
  8. Disha AR, Singh A, Suri V. Effect of chilled cabbage leaves vs. hot compression on breast engorgement among post natal mothers admitted in a tertiary care hospital. Nursing and Midwifery Research 2015; 11:24. Eittah HFA, Ashour ESS. Comparing warm compresses application vs. chilled cabbage leaves for relieving breast engorgement among post-natal mothers. Clinical Nursing Studies 2019; 7:58-67. Kumari R. Effectiveness of Green Cabbage Leaves (GCL) Vs Hot water bag (HWB) application on Breast Engorgement in Postnatal Mothers. Int J Nurs Edu 2019; 11:39-44.
  9. Zagloul MC, Naser EG, Hassan HE. Influence of hot compresses versus cabbage leaves on engorged breast in early puerperium. Int J Stud Nurs 2020; 5:7-14. Eti Aslan F. (Ed.). Ağrı değerlendirilmesi ve ölçümü. İstanbul: Avrupa Tıp Kitapçılık, 2006, s. 68-99.
  10. Karayurt Ö, Gürbüz H, Bilik Ö, Vural F, Fırat F, Ordin Sarıgöl Y. Kronik ağrılı hastaların tens uygulaması öncesi ve sonrası yaşam kalitesi, ağrı ve hemşirelerden memnuniyet düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksek Okulu Dergisi 2014; 7:26-32. World Health Organi