Based on the obtainedresults the performances of the both control approaches are technically discussed.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper deals with a comparative study between the control of three to three phase matrix converter feeding astar-connected three phase induction machine and the control of three to three phase dual matrix converterfeeding an open-end winding induction machine.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The control strategy used in both cases is based on a proposeddirect transfer function control approach of Venturini algorithm which allows to obtain a unity power factor atthe input side to boost the output phase voltage up to 150% compared to the input phase voltage, while keepingthe main advantage of the matrix converter by providing a fully bidirectional power flow operation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the obtainedresults the performances of the both control approaches are technically discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Matrix converter · Dual matrix converter · Direct transfer function approach
Abstract
This paper deals with a comparative study between the control of three to three phase matrix converter feeding astar-connected three phase induction machine and the control of three to three phase dual matrix converterfeeding an open-end winding induction machine. The control strategy used in both cases is based on a proposeddirect transfer function control approach of Venturini algorithm which allows to obtain a unity power factor atthe input side to boost the output phase voltage up to 150% compared to the input phase voltage, while keepingthe main advantage of the matrix converter by providing a fully bidirectional power flow operation. The mainobjective of using the open-end winding topology is to ensure the minimization of the common mode voltagewhich is clearly observed in the case of star-connected winding. Simulation results are presented under bothcontrol strategies, where both matrix converters are supplied from the same three-phase power source. Whereas;the two output voltage system of the dual matrix converter are shifted with 180 degrees. Based on the obtainedresults the performances of the both control approaches are technically discussed.
BELADEL, A., KOUZOU, A., HAFAIFA, A., SUNTER, S., MAHIA, D. (2017). A Comparative Study between Matrix Converter Fed InductionMotor Drive and Dual-Matrix Converter Fed Open-End WindingInduction Motor Drive. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 91–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/809634
Riedemanna, J., Andradeb, I., Peñab, R., BlascoGimenezc, R.,Clare J., Melin, P., Rivera, M. (2016). Modulation strategies for an open-end winding induction machine fed by a two-output indirect matrix converter, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation,144-152. 2.Wheeler, P.W., Rodriguez P.W., Clare, J.C., Empringham, L., Weinstein, A., (2002). Matrix converters: A technology review. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 49(2), 276-288. 3. Vargas, R., Rodríguez, J., Ammann, U., Wheeler, PW. (2008). Predictive current control of an induction machine fed by a matrix converter with reactive power control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 55(12), 4362-4371. 4. Venturini, M. (1980). A new sine wave in sine wave out, conversion technique which eliminates reactive elements. POWERCON 7, E3-1-E3-15. 5. Alesina, A., Venturini, M. (1989). Analysis and design of optimum-amplitude nine-switch direct ACAC converters, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 4(1), 101-112. 6. Ahmed, S.M., Abu-Rub, H., Kouzou, A. (2013). Predictive simultaneous power and current control in a three-phase direct matrix converter. International Conference on Power Electronics and Their Applications (ICPEA), Djefia-Algeria. 7. Bachir, G., Bendiabdellah, A. (2009). A comparative study between two control strategies for matrix converter. Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, 9(2), 23-27. 8. Beladel, A., Kouzou, A., Hafaifa, A., Mahia D., (2016). Dual matrix converter feeding an open-end winding load based on modified direct transfer approach, International Scientific Conference on Engineering, Technologies and Systems. 9. Altun, H., Sünter, S. (2003). Matrix converter induction motor drive: modeling, simulation and control. Electrical Engineering, 86(1), 25-33. 10. Rodriguez, J., Silva, E., Wheeler, P., (2013). Matrix converter controlled with the direct transfer function approach:analysis, modelling and simulation, International Journal of Electronics, 63-85. 11. Djahbar A., Mazari B., (2007). High performance motor drive using matrix converter, Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica, 2(7). 12. Guizana, S., Ammar, F.B., (2005). Dual open-end stator winding induction machine fed by redundant voltage source inverters, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 92(2), 2171-2181. 13. Riedemann, J., Clare, J.C., Wheeler, P.W., Blasco-Gimenez, R., Rivera, M., Pena, R. (2016). Open-end winding induction machine fed by a dualoutput indirect matrix convert