SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Science and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 21 Issue: 2

Deep Learning-Based Classification of Military Aircraft Types from Satellite Imagery

Uydu Görüntülerinde Askerî Uçak Tiplerinin Derin Öğrenme Temelli Sınıflandırılması

Fahrettin Varlik(SİİRT ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ)0009-0006-7540-8029
Cüneyt Özdemir(SIIRT UNIVERSITY, INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE)0000-0002-9252-5888
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results demonstrate that attention-enhanced multi-backbone representations provide an effective and practical solution for military aircraft recognition applications from satellite imagery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Automatic classification of military aircraft in satellite imagery is a challenging problem with a high risk of error due to the limited pixel area of targets, variations in image resolution and illumination conditions, background complexity, and strong visual similarity among classes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, a deep learning approach is proposed that integrates multi-feature extraction with attention-based focusing in order to strengthen the classification decision.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results demonstrate that attention-enhanced multi-backbone representations provide an effective and practical solution for military aircraft recognition applications from satellite imagery.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Military aircraft classification · attention mechanisms · deep learning

Abstract

Automatic classification of military aircraft in satellite imagery is a challenging problem with a high risk of error due to the limited pixel area of targets, variations in image resolution and illumination conditions, background complexity, and strong visual similarity among classes. In this study, a deep learning approach is proposed that integrates multi-feature extraction with attention-based focusing in order to strengthen the classification decision. The proposed architecture combines features extracted in parallel from two convolutional backbones with different representation capabilities and enhances the influence of discriminative regions through channel and spatial attention mechanisms. The model is trained using transfer learning to reduce the risk of overfitting caused by the limited number of samples. The method was evaluated on the MTARSI dataset, which contains 20 aircraft classes. Experimental findings show that the proposed approach achieved 99.79% accuracy on the test set and delivered similarly consistent performance in terms of precision, recall, and F1-score. Confusion matrix analysis further reveals that the misclassification rates remained low, particularly among visually similar platform types, and that the attention mechanism contributed meaningfully to inter-class discriminability. These results demonstrate that attention-enhanced multi-backbone representations provide an effective and practical solution for military aircraft recognition applications from satellite imagery.

Özet

Uydu görüntülerinde askerî uçakların otomatik olarak sınıflandırılması; hedeflerin düşük piksel alanına sahip olması, görüntü çözünürlüğü ve aydınlatma koşullarındaki değişkenlik, arka plan karmaşıklığı ve sınıflar arasındaki yüksek görsel benzerlik nedeniyle hata riskine açık bir problemdir. Bu çalışmada, sınıflandırma kararını güçlendirmek amacıyla çoklu özellik çıkarımı ile dikkat temelli odaklanmayı bütünleştiren bir derin öğrenme yaklaşımı önerilmektedir. Önerilen mimari, farklı temsil yeteneklerine sahip iki evrişimsel omurgadan paralel olarak elde edilen özellikleri bir araya getirmekte ve kanal ile uzamsal dikkat mekanizmaları aracılığıyla ayırt edici bölgelerin etkisini artırmaktadır. Model, transfer öğrenme yaklaşımıyla eğitilerek sınırlı örnek sayısının yol açabileceği aşırı uyum riskini azaltmayı hedeflemektedir. Yöntem, 20 uçak sınıfını içeren MTARSI veri kümesi üzerinde değerlendirilmiştir. Deneysel bulgular, önerilen yaklaşımın test kümesinde %99,79 doğruluk değerine ulaştığını; ayrıca kesinlik, duyarlılık ve F1-skoru metriklerinde de aynı düzeyde tutarlı performans sergilediğini göstermektedir. Karışıklık matrisi analizi, özellikle görsel olarak benzer platform tipleri arasında yanlış sınıflandırma oranlarının düşük kaldığını ve dikkat mekanizmasının sınıflar arası ayırt ediciliğe anlamlı katkı sağladığını ortaya koymaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, uydu görüntülerinden askerî uçak tanıma uygulamalarında dikkat destekli çoklu omurga temsillerinin etkili ve uygulanabilir bir çözüm sunduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Varlik, F., Özdemir, C. (2026). Deep Learning-Based Classification of Military Aircraft Types from Satellite Imagery. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology, Volume: 21 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.55525/tjst.1928640

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Lillesand, T. M., Kiefer, R. W., & Chipman, J. W. (2015). Remote sensing and image interpretation (7th ed.). Wiley.
  2. Jensen, J. R. (2016). Introductory digital image processing: A remote sensing perspective (4th ed.). Pearson.
  3. Campbell, J. B., & Wynne, R. H. (2011). Introduction to remote sensing (5th ed.). Guilford Press.
  4. Richards, J. A. (2013). Remote sensing digital image analysis: An introduction (5th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30062-2
  5. Goetz, A. F. H. (2009). Three decades of hyperspectral remote sensing of the Earth: A personal view. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, S5–S16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.12.014
  6. Scharre, P. (2018). Army of none: Autonomous weapons and the future of war. W. W. Norton & Company.
  7. Cummings, M. L. (2017). Artificial intelligence and the future of warfare. Chatham House, Royal Institute of International Affairs.
  8. Liu, Q., Xiang, X., Wang, Y., Luo, Z., & Fang, F. (2020). Aircraft detection in remote sensing image based on corner clustering and deep learning. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 87, 103333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103333
  9. Lin, J., Li, X., & Pan, H. (2018). Aircraft recognition in remote sensing images based on deep learning. In 2018 33rd Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC) (pp. 895–899). https://doi.org/10.1109/YAC.2018.8406498
  10. Zhao, Z., Zheng, P., Xu, S., & Wu, X. (2019). Object detection with deep learning: A review. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 30(11), 3212–3232. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2876865
  11. Azam, S., Munir, F., Jeon, M., & Jeong, D. (2022). Deep learning-based object detection in remote sensing images: A survey. Remote Sensing, 14(3), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030634
  12. Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer.
  13. Lowe, D. G. (2004). Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60(2), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94
  14. Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005). Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 886–893). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2005.177
  15. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2012). ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 25, 1097–1105. https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386
  16. Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1409.1556
  17. Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015). Going deeper with convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 1–9). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594
  18. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 770–778). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90
  19. Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017). Densely connected convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 4700–4708). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.243
  20. Tan, M., & Le, Q. (2019). EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (pp. 6105–6114). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.11946
  21. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016). You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 779–788). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.91
  22. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2015). Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 28.
  23. Bakırman, T., & Sertel, E. (2023). A benchmark dataset for deep learning-based airplane detection: HRPlanes. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 8(3), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1107890
  24. Guan, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, L., Zhao, S., & Li, G. (2023). Aircraft detection and fine-grained recognition based on high-resolution remote sensing images. Electronics, 12(14), 3146. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12143146
  25. Zhao, Z., Tuo, W., Zhang, S., & Zhao, X. (2025). A counterfactual fine-grained aircraft classification network for remote sensing images based on normalized coordinate attention. Applied Sciences, 15(16), 8903. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15168903
  26. Xia, G.-S., Bai, X., Ding, J., Zhu, Z., Belongie, S., Luo, J., Datcu, M., Pelillo, M., & Zhang, L. (2018). DOTA: A large-scale dataset for object detection in aerial images. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 3974–3983).
  27. Woo, S., Park, J., Lee, J.-Y., & Kweon, I. S. (2018). CBAM: Convolutional block attention module. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (pp. 3–19). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.06521
  28. Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016). Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 2818–2826). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.308
  29. Zenodo. (2020). MTARSI: Multi-Type Aircraft Remote Sensing Images dataset [Data set]. https://zenodo.org/records/3464319
  30. Keiner, L. E. (2008). Electromagnetic Spectrum [online]. Wikimedia Commons. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_spectrum
  31. Li, S. (2024). Real HSI-MSI-PAN image dataset for the hyperspectral/multi-spectral/panchromatic image fusion and super-resolution fields [Data set]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02387
  32. Asokan, A., & Anitha, J. (2019). Change detection techniques for remote sensing applications: A survey. Earth Science Informatics, 12(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-019-00380-5
  33. Bengio, Y. (2009). Learning deep architectures for AI. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 2(1), 1–127. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000006