Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Science and Technology / 2017 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

A Comparative Study between Matrix Converter Fed InductionMotor Drive and Dual-Matrix Converter Fed Open-End WindingInduction Motor Drive

Sayfa
91–99
Yayın Tarihi
2017-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on the obtainedresults the performances of the both control approaches are technically discussed.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper deals with a comparative study between the control of three to three phase matrix converter feeding astar-connected three phase induction machine and the control of three to three phase dual matrix converterfeeding an open-end winding induction machine.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The control strategy used in both cases is based on a proposeddirect transfer function control approach of Venturini algorithm which allows to obtain a unity power factor atthe input side to boost the output phase voltage up to 150% compared to the input phase voltage, while keepingthe main advantage of the matrix converter by providing a fully bidirectional power flow operation.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on the obtainedresults the performances of the both control approaches are technically discussed.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Matrix converter · Dual matrix converter · Direct transfer function approach

Abstract

This paper deals with a comparative study between the control of three to three phase matrix converter feeding astar-connected three phase induction machine and the control of three to three phase dual matrix converterfeeding an open-end winding induction machine. The control strategy used in both cases is based on a proposeddirect transfer function control approach of Venturini algorithm which allows to obtain a unity power factor atthe input side to boost the output phase voltage up to 150% compared to the input phase voltage, while keepingthe main advantage of the matrix converter by providing a fully bidirectional power flow operation. The mainobjective of using the open-end winding topology is to ensure the minimization of the common mode voltagewhich is clearly observed in the case of star-connected winding. Simulation results are presented under bothcontrol strategies, where both matrix converters are supplied from the same three-phase power source. Whereas;the two output voltage system of the dual matrix converter are shifted with 180 degrees. Based on the obtainedresults the performances of the both control approaches are technically discussed.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BELADEL, A., KOUZOU, A., HAFAIFA, A., SUNTER, S., MAHIA, D. (2017). A Comparative Study between Matrix Converter Fed InductionMotor Drive and Dual-Matrix Converter Fed Open-End WindingInduction Motor Drive. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 91–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/809634

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Riedemanna, J., Andradeb, I., Peñab, R., BlascoGimenezc, R.,Clare J., Melin, P., Rivera, M. (2016). Modulation strategies for an open-end winding induction machine fed by a two-output indirect matrix converter, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation,144-152. 2.Wheeler, P.W., Rodriguez P.W., Clare, J.C., Empringham, L., Weinstein, A., (2002). Matrix converters: A technology review. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 49(2), 276-288. 3. Vargas, R., Rodríguez, J., Ammann, U., Wheeler, PW. (2008). Predictive current control of an induction machine fed by a matrix converter with reactive power control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 55(12), 4362-4371. 4. Venturini, M. (1980). A new sine wave in sine wave out, conversion technique which eliminates reactive elements. POWERCON 7, E3-1-E3-15. 5. Alesina, A., Venturini, M. (1989). Analysis and design of optimum-amplitude nine-switch direct ACAC converters, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 4(1), 101-112. 6. Ahmed, S.M., Abu-Rub, H., Kouzou, A. (2013). Predictive simultaneous power and current control in a three-phase direct matrix converter. International Conference on Power Electronics and Their Applications (ICPEA), Djefia-Algeria. 7. Bachir, G., Bendiabdellah, A. (2009). A comparative study between two control strategies for matrix converter. Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, 9(2), 23-27. 8. Beladel, A., Kouzou, A., Hafaifa, A., Mahia D., (2016). Dual matrix converter feeding an open-end winding load based on modified direct transfer approach, International Scientific Conference on Engineering, Technologies and Systems. 9. Altun, H., Sünter, S. (2003). Matrix converter induction motor drive: modeling, simulation and control. Electrical Engineering, 86(1), 25-33. 10. Rodriguez, J., Silva, E., Wheeler, P., (2013). Matrix converter controlled with the direct transfer function approach:analysis, modelling and simulation, International Journal of Electronics, 63-85. 11. Djahbar A., Mazari B., (2007). High performance motor drive using matrix converter, Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica, 2(7). 12. Guizana, S., Ammar, F.B., (2005). Dual open-end stator winding induction machine fed by redundant voltage source inverters, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 92(2), 2171-2181. 13. Riedemann, J., Clare, J.C., Wheeler, P.W., Blasco-Gimenez, R., Rivera, M., Pena, R. (2016). Open-end winding induction machine fed by a dualoutput indirect matrix convert