Journals / Turkish Journal of Science and Technology / 2022 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Dynamic Response of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames to Pulse Period in Near-Fault Ground Motions

Pages
357–373
Publication Date
2022-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that peak ground acceleration (PGA) could be identified as a key parameter that controls the response of braced frames under FF ground motions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Steel braced frame systems (SBFs) having high stiffness and high strength are commonly utilized due to their resistance to lateral seismic forces in regions with high seismicity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To achieve dynamic responses of steel frames with different concentric bracings under NF ground motions, which especially have small, medium, and long pulse periods, 3-story and 4-span CBFs having different bracing configurations were selected as an example. 4 FF and 12 NF ground motions having different pulse durations were chosen to evaluate the dynamic response of concentrically braced frames.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that peak ground acceleration (PGA) could be identified as a key parameter that controls the response of braced frames under FF ground motions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dynamic response · pulse period · near-fault

Abstract

Steel braced frame systems (SBFs) having high stiffness and high strength are commonly utilized due to their resistance to lateral seismic forces in regions with high seismicity. In this study, concentrically braced frames (CBFs) having different bracing configurations are used to obtain the significance of the pulse period associated with near-fault (NF) ground motion by time-history dynamic analysis. Besides, far-fault (FF) ground motions are also used to compare with NF ground motion results according to chancing bracing configurations. To achieve dynamic responses of steel frames with different concentric bracings under NF ground motions, which especially have small, medium, and long pulse periods, 3-story and 4-span CBFs having different bracing configurations were selected as an example. 4 FF and 12 NF ground motions having different pulse durations were chosen to evaluate the dynamic response of concentrically braced frames. The results showed that peak ground acceleration (PGA) could be identified as a key parameter that controls the response of braced frames under FF ground motions. In addition, the ratio of the pulse duration to the first mode period is the dominant parameter when this ratio is only greater than 1.0 under the NF ground motions.

🔖

Cite This Article

TONYALI, Z., YURDAKUL, M., SESLİ, H. (2022). Dynamic Response of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames to Pulse Period in Near-Fault Ground Motions. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 357–373. https://ajindex.com/articles/809550

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Martinelli L, Mulas MG, Perotti F. The seismic response of concentrically braced moment‐resisting steel frames. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 1996; 25: 1275-1299
  2. Balendra T, Huang X. Overstrength and ductility factors for steel frames designed according to BS 5950. Journal of Structural EngineeringJournal of Structural Engineering 2003;129: 1019-1035
  3. Kim J, Choi H. Response modification factors of chevron-braced frames. Engineering Structures 2005; 27(2): 285-300
  4. Dicleli M, Mehta A. Seismic performance of a special type of single-story eccentrically braced steel frame. Advances in Structural Engineering 2008; 11(1): 35-51
  5. Khandelwal K, El-Tawil S, Sadek F. Progressive collapse analysis of seismically designed steel braced frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2009; 65(3): 699-708
  6. Coffield A, Adeli H. An investigation of the effectiveness of the framing systems in steel structures subjected to blast loading. Journal of Civil Engineering Management 2014; 20(6): 767-777
  7. Shiravand MR, Shabani MJ. The effect of oblique blast loadings on moment and braced frames in steel structures. Advances in Structural Engineering 2016; 19(4): 563-580
  8. Qi Y, Li W, Feng N. Seismic collapse probability of eccentrically braced steel frames. Steel and Composite Structures 2017; 24: 37-52
  9. Larijan RJ, Nasserabadi HD, Aghayan I. Progressive collapse analysis of buildings with concentric and eccentric braced frames. Structural engineering and mechanics 2017; 61(6): 755-763
  10. Bosco M, Marino E, Rossi P. A design procedure for dual eccentrically braced-moment resisting frames in the framework of Eurocode 8. Engineering structures 2017; 130: 198-215
  11. Karsaz K, Tosee SVR. A comparative study on the behavior of steel moment-resisting frames with different bracing systems based on a response-based damage index. Civil Engineering Journal 2018; 4(6), 1354-1373
  12. Yaman Z, Ağcakoca E. Performance Analysis of Circular Sieve Owner Center Steel Crosses. Sakarya University Journal of Science 2018; 22(2): 340-349
  13. Faroughi A, Sarvghad Moghadam A, Ghanooni Bagha M. The Effects of Number and Location of Bracing Bays on Redundancy of Eccentrically-Braced Steel Moment Frames. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering 2021; 8(8): 5-20
  14. Altan Y. Merkezi ve dışmerkez çaprazlı çelik bina yapılarında deprem performansının belirlenmesi, Master thesis, İstanbul Gelişim Üniversity, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2020