SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yenilikçi Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri / 2022 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2

An Investigation on Seismically Isolated Buildings in Near-Fault Region

Hasan SESLİ
Zeliha TONYALI
Muhammet YURDAKUL
Pages
47–65
Publication Date
2022-07-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The seismically isolated building has a less structural demand depending on the vibration mode period under pulse-like near-fault ground motions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effects of far-fault, near-fault and pulse-type ground motions on a seismically isolated building were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The 3-dimensional finite element model of the building was created in the SAP2000 software and the dynamic characteristics were determined numerically.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The seismically isolated building has a less structural demand depending on the vibration mode period under pulse-like near-fault ground motions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dynamic behavior · Near-fault ground motion · Far-fault ground motion

Abstract

In this study, the effects of far-fault, near-fault and pulse-type ground motions on a seismically isolated building were investigated. The 3-dimensional finite element model of the building was created in the SAP2000 software and the dynamic characteristics were determined numerically. Three different earthquake ground motion characteristics of 1999 Düzce Earthquake in Turkey were selected to evaluate the structural behavior. The record motions of the Mudurnu and Sakarya station were selected as far-fault ground motion. For near-fault ground motion, 1999 Düzce Earthquake Düzce and Lamont 1062 station records were selected. 1999 Düzce Earthquake Bolu and IRIGM 487 station records were selected as pulse-type ground motion. The behavior of the building supported by friction pendulum isolators with a displacement capacity of 48 cm was compared with the analysis results of fixed-base building. The displacement values of the 1st, 4th and 7th floors of the building were obtained. The effects of earthquake ground motions and isolator were evaluated according to floor displacement values. The seismically isolated building has a less structural demand depending on the vibration mode period under pulse-like near-fault ground motions.

🔖

Cite This Article

SESLİ, H., TONYALI, Z., YURDAKUL, M. (2022). An Investigation on Seismically Isolated Buildings in Near-Fault Region. Yenilikçi Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 47–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/978698

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Yang D, Pan J, Li G (2010) Interstory drift ratio of building structures subjected to near-fault ground motions based on generalized drift spectral analysis. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 30:1182–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.04.026
  2. Somerville PG (2003) Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse. Phys. earth Planet Inter. 137:201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(03)00015-3
  3. Zou D, Han H, Liu J, Yang D, Kong X (2017) Seismic failure analysis for a high concrete face rockfill dam subjected to near-fault pulse-like ground motions. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 98:235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.031
  4. Mahmoud S, Alqarni A, Saliba J, Ibrahim AH, Diab H (2021) Influence of floor system on seismic behavior of RC buildings to forward directivity and fling-step in the near-fault region. Structures 30:803–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.052
  5. Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2000) Consideration of near-fault ground motion effects in seismic design. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2001). Effects of near-fault ground motions on frame structures. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Stanford. Liao W-I, Loh C-H, Lee B-H (2004) Comparison of dynamic response of isolated and non-isolated continuous girder bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions. Eng. Struct. 26:2173–2183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.016
  6. Yılmaz D, Soyluk K (2019) Comparative analysis of steel arch bridges under near-fault ground motion effects of directivity-pulse and fling-step. J. Struct. Eng. 2:63–74, 2019. https://doi.org/10.31462/jseam.2019.02063074
  7. Bertero VV, Mahin SA, Herrera RA (1978) “Aseismic design implications of near‐fault San Fernando earthquake records. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 6:31–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290060105
  8. Anderson JC, Bertero VV (1987) Uncertainties in establishing design earthquakes. J. Struct. Eng. 113:1709–1724. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:8(1709)
  9. Hall JF, Heaton TH, Halling MW, Wald DJ (1995) Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings. Earthq. spectra 11:569–605. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585828
  10. Malhotra PK (1999) Response of buildings to near‐field pulse‐like ground motions. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28:1309–1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11 3.0.CO;2-U Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2000) Consideration of near-fault ground motion effects in seismic design. Proceedings of the