Dergiler / Yenilikçi Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri / 2022 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2

An Investigation on Seismically Isolated Buildings in Near-Fault Region

Sayfa
47–65
Yayın Tarihi
2022-07-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The seismically isolated building has a less structural demand depending on the vibration mode period under pulse-like near-fault ground motions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, the effects of far-fault, near-fault and pulse-type ground motions on a seismically isolated building were investigated.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The 3-dimensional finite element model of the building was created in the SAP2000 software and the dynamic characteristics were determined numerically.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The seismically isolated building has a less structural demand depending on the vibration mode period under pulse-like near-fault ground motions.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Dynamic behavior · Near-fault ground motion · Far-fault ground motion

Abstract

In this study, the effects of far-fault, near-fault and pulse-type ground motions on a seismically isolated building were investigated. The 3-dimensional finite element model of the building was created in the SAP2000 software and the dynamic characteristics were determined numerically. Three different earthquake ground motion characteristics of 1999 Düzce Earthquake in Turkey were selected to evaluate the structural behavior. The record motions of the Mudurnu and Sakarya station were selected as far-fault ground motion. For near-fault ground motion, 1999 Düzce Earthquake Düzce and Lamont 1062 station records were selected. 1999 Düzce Earthquake Bolu and IRIGM 487 station records were selected as pulse-type ground motion. The behavior of the building supported by friction pendulum isolators with a displacement capacity of 48 cm was compared with the analysis results of fixed-base building. The displacement values of the 1st, 4th and 7th floors of the building were obtained. The effects of earthquake ground motions and isolator were evaluated according to floor displacement values. The seismically isolated building has a less structural demand depending on the vibration mode period under pulse-like near-fault ground motions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SESLİ, H., TONYALI, Z., YURDAKUL, M. (2022). An Investigation on Seismically Isolated Buildings in Near-Fault Region. Yenilikçi Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 47–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/978698

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Yang D, Pan J, Li G (2010) Interstory drift ratio of building structures subjected to near-fault ground motions based on generalized drift spectral analysis. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 30:1182–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.04.026
  2. Somerville PG (2003) Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse. Phys. earth Planet Inter. 137:201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(03)00015-3
  3. Zou D, Han H, Liu J, Yang D, Kong X (2017) Seismic failure analysis for a high concrete face rockfill dam subjected to near-fault pulse-like ground motions. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 98:235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.031
  4. Mahmoud S, Alqarni A, Saliba J, Ibrahim AH, Diab H (2021) Influence of floor system on seismic behavior of RC buildings to forward directivity and fling-step in the near-fault region. Structures 30:803–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.052
  5. Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2000) Consideration of near-fault ground motion effects in seismic design. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2001). Effects of near-fault ground motions on frame structures. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Stanford. Liao W-I, Loh C-H, Lee B-H (2004) Comparison of dynamic response of isolated and non-isolated continuous girder bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions. Eng. Struct. 26:2173–2183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.016
  6. Yılmaz D, Soyluk K (2019) Comparative analysis of steel arch bridges under near-fault ground motion effects of directivity-pulse and fling-step. J. Struct. Eng. 2:63–74, 2019. https://doi.org/10.31462/jseam.2019.02063074
  7. Bertero VV, Mahin SA, Herrera RA (1978) “Aseismic design implications of near‐fault San Fernando earthquake records. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 6:31–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290060105
  8. Anderson JC, Bertero VV (1987) Uncertainties in establishing design earthquakes. J. Struct. Eng. 113:1709–1724. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:8(1709)
  9. Hall JF, Heaton TH, Halling MW, Wald DJ (1995) Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings. Earthq. spectra 11:569–605. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585828
  10. Malhotra PK (1999) Response of buildings to near‐field pulse‐like ground motions. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28:1309–1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11 3.0.CO;2-U Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2000) Consideration of near-fault ground motion effects in seismic design. Proceedings of the