Journals / The Journal of International Scientific Researches / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Bibliometric Analysis of Researches Examining Board of Directors with Agency Theory Perspective

Yönetim Kurullarını Vekâlet Teorisi Perspektifiyle Ele Alan Araştırmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Pages
317–335
Publication Date
2022-10-07
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, the results indicate that the most cited publications put their journals at the top of the most cited journals list.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to reveal the development and trends of academic literature examining the board of directors with agency theory perspective, and thus to contribute to the literature and researchers who aim to do research on this subject.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the search, a total of 573 studies in business, management and accounting fields which were conducted between 1992-2022 constituted the research sample.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, the results indicate that the most cited publications put their journals at the top of the most cited journals list.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Vekâlet Kuramı · Yönetim Kurulu Yapısı · Bibliyometrik Analiz

Abstract

The aim of this study is to reveal the development and trends of academic literature examining the board of directors with agency theory perspective, and thus to contribute to the literature and researchers who aim to do research on this subject. For this purpose, a search was conducted by using the keywords "agency theory", "board of directors", "board structure", "board composition", "board characteristic" and "CEO duality" in the Scopus database. As a result of the search, a total of 573 studies in business, management and accounting fields which were conducted between 1992-2022 constituted the research sample. The data set obtained from this sample was analyzed in “biblioshiny” application in the RStudio program. Analysis results reveal that the development of field is provided through articles, and the most frequently used keywords are "corporate governance", "agency theory" and "board of director". Also, the results indicate that the most cited publications put their journals at the top of the most cited journals list. Thematic map, on the other hand, reveals that even efforts to combine stewardship theory and resource dependence theory with agency theory have limited importance for the development of the field.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, yönetim kurullarını vekâlet teorisi perspektifiyle irdeleyen akademik yazının gelişimi ve eğilimlerini ortaya koyarak yazına ve bu konuda araştırma yapmayı hedefleyen araştırmacılara katkıda bulunmaktır. Bu amaçla Scopus veri tabanında “agency theory”, “board of directors”, “board structure”, “board composition”, “board characteristic” ve “CEO duality” anahtar kelimeleri kullanılarak arama yapılmıştır. Arama sonucunda 1992-2022 yılları arasında işletme, yönetim ve muhasebe alanlarında yapılan toplamda 573 çalışma araştırma örneklemini oluşturmuştur. Bu örneklemden elde edilen veri seti RStudio programında yer alan “biblioshiny” uygulamasında analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçları, alanın gelişiminin makaleler aracılığıyla gerçekleştiğini, en sık kullanılan anahtar kelimelerin ise “kurumsal yönetim”, “vekâlet teorisi” ve “yönetim kurulu” olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca araştırma sonuçları en çok atıf alan yayınların, yayınlandıkları dergileri en çok atıf yapılan dergiler listesinin başına yerleştirdiğine işaret etmektedir. Tematik harita ise, temsil teorisi ve kaynak bağımlılığı teorilerini vekâlet teorisi ile birleştiren araştırmalar mevcut olsa dâhi bu çabaların alanın gelişimi için sınırlı öneme sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYTEKİN, S. S. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Researches Examining Board of Directors with Agency Theory Perspective. The Journal of International Scientific Researches, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 317–335. https://ajindex.com/articles/806417

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akyüz, B. (2009). Kurumsal yönetim ve Türkiye’de kurumsal yönetim düzenlemeleri. Muhasebe ve Vergi Uygulamaları Dergisi, 2(2), 53-81.
  2. Antwi, I. F. (2021). Bibliometric analysis: Agency theory in accounting. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 7(1), 56-76.
  3. Aria, M., Misuraca, M., & Spano, M. (2020). Mapping the evolution of social research and data science on 30 years of Social Indicators Research. Social Indicators Research, 149(3), 803-831.
  4. Aria, M., Alterisio, A., Scandurra, A., Pinelli, C., & D’Aniello, B. (2021). The scholar’s best friend: Research trends in dog cognitive and behavioral studies. Animal Cognition, 24(3), 541-553.
  5. Aşkun, V. Ve Çizel, R. (2019). Kompleks problem çözme üzerine R programı ile bir bibliyometrik analiz. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, 9(1), 37-47.
  6. Bathala, C. T., & Rao, R. P. (1995). The determinants of board composition: An agency theory perspective. Managerial and Decision Economics, 16(1), 59-69.
  7. Beatty, R. P., & Zajac, E. J. (1994). Managerial incentives, monitoring, and risk bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 313-335.
  8. Boyd, B. K. (1995). CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16(4), 301-312.
  9. Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., & Jarrell, G. (1997). Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and chairman of the board. Journal of Corporate Finance, 3(3), 189-220.
  10. Brigham, E. F., & Daves, P. R. (2007). Intermediate Financial Management (9th ed.). USA: Thomson South-Western. Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12(5-6), 373-379.
  11. Buchanan, A. (1996). Toward a theory of the ethics of bureaucratic organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(4), 419-440.
  12. Cai, C. X., Hillier, D., Tian, G., & Wu, Q. (2015). Do audit committees reduce the agency costs of ownership structure?. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 35, 225-240.
  13. Carter, D. A., D'Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396-414.
  14. Cobo, M. J., Martínez, M. A., Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Fujita, H., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). 25 years at knowledge-based systems: A bibliometric analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 80, 3-13.
  15. Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2002). Corporate governance and the audit pr