Journals / Uluslararası Ekonomi İşletme ve Politika Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

DOES TAKING PLACE IN THE CENTRAL NETWORK POSITION PROVIDE ADVANTAGES TO THE ACTOR?: A RESEARCH IN TURKISH BUSINESS GROUPS SAMPLE / Ağın Merkezinde Yer Almak Aktöre Avantaj Sağlar Mı?: Türk İşletme Grupları Örnekleminde Bir Araştırma

AĞIN MERKEZİNDE YER ALMAK AKTÖRE AVANTAJ SAĞLAR MI?: TÜRK İŞLETME GRUPLARI ÖRNEKLEMİNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA / Does Taking Place In The Central Network Position Provide Advantages To The Actor?: A Research In Turkish Business Groups Sample

Pages
165–190
Publication Date
2017-10-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings of the analysis suggest that business groups affiliates that locates in more central position both in networks form with commercial ties and interlocking directorate ties have statistically significant and positive effects on their financial performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is to demonstrate the effect of business group affiliates' position in network which is formed in business group firms on their financial performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The analysis conducted with data of 74 affiliates of 15 business groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings of the analysis suggest that business groups affiliates that locates in more central position both in networks form with commercial ties and interlocking directorate ties have statistically significant and positive effects on their financial performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal Sermaye · Merkeziyet · Social Capital

Abstract

The aim of this research is to demonstrate the effect of business group affiliates' position in network which is formed in business group firms on their financial performance. This relation is analyzed on a sample that contains affiliates of various business groups which are listed in Borsa Istanbul. The analysis conducted with data of 74 affiliates of 15 business groups. The findings of the analysis suggest that business groups affiliates that locates in more central position both in networks form with commercial ties and interlocking directorate ties have statistically significant and positive effects on their financial performance. 

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, işletme gruplarının bağlı işletmelerinin, işletme grubu içerisinde oluşan ağ düzeneğinde yer aldıkları konumun finansal performansları üzerindeki etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Bu ilişki, Borsa İstanbul’da koteli ve bir işletme grubuna bağlı işletmelerden oluşan örneklem üzerinde analiz edilmiştir. Toplamda 15 işletme grubuna ait 74 bağlı işletmenin verileri üzerinde analizler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analizler sonucunda, hem ticari bağlardan oluşan ağ yapısı içerisinde hem de örtüşen yönetim kurulu üyeliklerinden oluşan ağ içerisinde daha merkezi konumda bulunan bağlı işletmelerin finansal performanslarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve pozitif yönlü ilişkiler gözlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYTEKİN, S. S. (2017). DOES TAKING PLACE IN THE CENTRAL NETWORK POSITION PROVIDE ADVANTAGES TO THE ACTOR?: A RESEARCH IN TURKISH BUSINESS GROUPS SAMPLE / Ağın Merkezinde Yer Almak Aktöre Avantaj Sağlar Mı?: Türk İşletme Grupları Örnekleminde Bir Araştırma. Uluslararası Ekonomi İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 165–190. https://ajindex.com/articles/816154

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Adler, Paul S. ve Seok-Woo Kwon, (2002), “Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept”, Academy of Management Review, 27(1), s. 17-40.
  2. Ahuja, Gautam, (2000), “The Duality of Collaboration: Inducements and Opportunities in the Formation of Interfirm Linkages”, Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), s. 317-343.
  3. Autry, Chad W. ve Susan L. Golicic, (2010), “Evaluating Buyer-Supplier Relationship-Performance Spirals: A Longitudinal Study”, Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), s. 87-100.
  4. Badar, Kamal vd., (2013), “Examining the Relationship of Co-Authorship Network Centrality and Gender on Academic Research Performance: The Case of Chemistry Researchers in Pakistan”, Scientometrics, 94(2), s. 755-775.
  5. Belliveau, Maura A. vd., (1996), “Social Capital at the Top: Effects of Social Similarity and Status on CEO Compensation”, Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), s. 1568-1593.
  6. Borgatti, Stephen P., (2005), “Centrality and Network Flow”, Social Networks, 27(1), s. 55-71.
  7. Brass, Daniel J. vd., (2004), “Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective”, Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), s. 795-817.
  8. Brass, Daniel J., (1984), “Being in The Right Place: A Structural Analysis of Individual Influence in an Organization”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), s. 518-539.
  9. Brouthers, Lance Eliot vd., (2014), “Keiretsu Centrality-Profits and Profit Stability: A Power Dependence Perspective”, Journal of Business Research, 67(12), s. 2603-2610.
  10. Brunetta, Federica vd., (2015), “Central Positions and Performance in the Scientific Community. Evidences from Clinical Research Projects”, Journal of Business Research, 68(5), s. 1074-1081.
  11. Bryman, Alan ve Duncan Cramer, (1997), Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS for Windows: A Guide for Social Scientists, New York: Routledge. Buğra, Ayşe, (2010), Devlet ve İşadamları, 7. Baskı,
  12. İletişim Yayınları,
  13. İstanbul.
  14. Burt, Ronald S., (2000), Structural Holes Versus Network Closure as Social Capital, http: //snap.stanford.edu/class/cs224w-readings/burt00capital.pdf (E.T: 20.12.2014).
  15. Canbolat, Ela Ozkan, (2011), “Social Capital Influences on Business Groups’ Diversification Strategies”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, s. 1436-1443.
  16. Carey, Sinéad vd., (2011), “Social Capital Configuration, Legal Bonds and Performance in Buyer–Supplier Relationships”, Journal of Operations Management, 29(4), s. 277-288.
  17. Chang, Sea Jin ve Jaebum Hong, (2000), “Economic Performance of Group-Affiliated Companies in Korea: Intr