SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Temel Eğitim / 2019 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3

A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Laboratory Based Teaching on Students' Success

Mustafa YESILYURT
Ali GURBETOGLU
Figen DEMIRTAS YILMAZ
Pages
53–63
Publication Date
2019-07-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results demonstrate that laboratory based teaching methods significantly influence academic success +2,8729 size.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between laboratory based teaching methods on science education and student success, by using meta-analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper used the research results which were reported from 2000 to 2012 years in Turkey which analyzing the effects of laboratory based teaching methods on student success.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results demonstrate that laboratory based teaching methods significantly influence academic success +2,8729 size.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Laboratory Based Teaching · Science Learning · Meta-Analyse

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between laboratory based teaching methods on science education and student success, by using meta-analysis. This paper used the research results which were reported from 2000 to 2012 years in Turkey which analyzing the effects of laboratory based teaching methods on student success. By the meta-analysis methods, one PhD dissertation, 17 Master’s theses and 12 published articles were the main sources of this paper used to demonstrate the influence of laboratory based teachings on science education. Thalheimer also showed that laboratory based teaching in a significant degree affects academic success. The results demonstrate that laboratory based teaching methods significantly influence academic success +2,8729 size.

Özet

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between laboratory based teaching methods on science education and student success, by using meta-analysis. This paper used the research results which were reported from 2000 to 2012 years in Turkey which analyzing the effects of laboratory based teaching methods on student success. By the meta-analysis methods, one PhD dissertation, 17 Master’s theses and 12 published articles were the main sources of this paper used to demonstrate the influence of laboratory based teachings on science education. Thalheimer also showed that laboratory based teaching in a significant degree affects academic success. The results demonstrate that laboratory based teaching methods significantly influence academic success +2,8729 size.

🔖

Cite This Article

YESILYURT, M., GURBETOGLU, A., YILMAZ, F. D. (2019). A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Laboratory Based Teaching on Students' Success. Temel Eğitim, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3, 53–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/805829

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Acar, S. (2011). Testing the Effects of Students’ Attitude Toward the Lesson Based on Computer-Aided Teaching in the Field of Physics Chemistry Biology and Mathematics by the Method of Meta-Analysis. Master Thesis. Yuzuncu Yil University, Institute of Science, Van. Acisli, S. & Turgut, U. (2009). The Examination of the Influence of the Materials Generated In Compliance With 5E Learning Model on Physics Laboratory Applications. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2): 562-593
  2. Akgoz, S., Ercan, I. & Kan, I. (2004). Meta Analysis. Uludag University Medical Faculty Journal, 30(2) 107-112.Altinok, M. S. (2011). Effect of Teachıng Heat and Temperature through Laboratory Method on Achıevements of 5th Grade Students, Master’s Thesıs. Ataturk University, Institute of Educational Sciences. Altun, A. (2009). Development of guide material for DNA extraction and electrophoresis. M.Sc. Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Science. Atici, O. & Atici, T. (2004). Investigating in Biology Syllabus Topics at Photosynthesis Experiments of the Effect Student Achievement and their Diversification. Turk Journal of Science Education, 10(1): 143-166.
  3. Aydogdu, C. (2000). A Comparison of Chemistry Instruction Enriched with Experiments and Traditional Problem Solving Activities in Term of Chemistry Lesson. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 19: 29-31.
  4. Azar, A. & Aydin Sengulec, O. (2010). Computer-Assisted and Laboratory-Assisted Teaching Methods in Physics Teaching: The Effect on Student Physics Achievement and Attitude towards Physics. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 43-50.
  5. Basak, A. (2002). Effect on the Success Material of the Use of Elementary School Students. M.Sc. Thesis, Marmara University, Institute of Science. Basdas, E. (2007). The Effect of Hands-On Science Learning Method in the Education of Science in Primary School on the Science Process Skills, Academic Achievement and Motivation. M.Sc. Thesis, Celal Bayar University, Institute of Science. Baskurt, P. (2009). The Effects of Hands-On Science Learning Method on Students’ Academic Achievement, Retention of Knowledge and Attitudes towards Science Course in “Force and Motion” Unit. M.Sc. Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Education Sciences. Bayrak, B., Kanli, U. & Kandil Ingec, S. (2007). To Compare The Effects of Computer Based Learning and The Laboratory Based Learning On Students’ Achievement Regarding Electric Circuits. The Turkish Online Journal of Education