Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Türkiye’de Sosyal Sermaye ve Göç

Pages
70–91
Publication Date
2021-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this sense, our findings are in line with the international literature on the relationship between social capital and migration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:While Turkey was not mentioned in the first 20 country list as a refugee hosting country until 2012, in 2015 it became a country with the largest refugee population in the World (UNHCR 2015).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The number of the refugees has currently reached to 3.5 million in the country and in some regions the number of the refugees has surpassed the local population.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this sense, our findings are in line with the international literature on the relationship between social capital and migration.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sosyal Sermaye · Suriye Göçü · Kantil Regresyon

Abstract

While Turkey was not mentioned in the first 20 country list as a refugee hosting country until 2012, in 2015 it became a country with the largest refugee population in the World (UNHCR 2015). The number of the refugees has currently reached to 3.5 million in the country and in some regions the number of the refugees has surpassed the local population. This article examines the changes that occurred in the social capital stock of the country triggered by the changes in the demographic shifts. In using quantile regression model analysis, this article concludes that while the density of migrant population is in positive correlation with bonding social capital, it displays a negative correlation with bridging social capital. In this sense, our findings are in line with the international literature on the relationship between social capital and migration.

Özet

Türkiye 2012 yılına kadar mülteciler için ev sahipliği kategorisinde ilk 20 ülke arasına girmezken, 2015 yılı itibariyle dünyanın en fazla mülteci nüfusuna sahip ülkesi konumuna gelmiştir (UNHCR, 2015). Bu yıldan itibaren ülkedeki mülteci sayısı artarak bugün 3.5 milyonun üzerinde bir rakama ulaşmıştır. Ülkenin bazı bölgelerinde mülteci nüfus yoğunluğunun, yerel nüfusun üzerinde olduğu görülmektedir. Bu makalede demografik yapıda gerçekleşen bu değişimin Türkiye’deki sosyal sermaye birikimi ile ilişkisi araştırılmıştır. Kantil regresyon modeli ile yürütülen analizlere göre düzensiz göç sonucu oluşan yabancı nüfus yoğunluğu, dayanışmacı (bonding) sosyal sermaye ile pozitif, köprüleyici (bridging) sosyal sermaye ile ise negatif bir korelasyon kurmaktadır. Çalışmada, dayanışmacı sosyal sermayenin kutuplaştırıcı yönüne dikkat çekilirken, köprüleyici sosyal sermayeye ilişkin sonuçların uluslararası yazında gözlemlenen bulgularla benzerliği vurgulanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

LLOYD, F. A. T., TÜRK, U. (2021). Türkiye’de Sosyal Sermaye ve Göç. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 70–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/790575

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adam, F., ve Roncevic B., 2003. “Social Capital: Recent Debates and Research Trends”, Social Science Information, 42: 155-183.
  2. Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E. 2000. “Participation in Heterogeneous Communities”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (3): 847-904.
  3. Amati, V., Meggiolaro, S., Rivellini, G., & Zaccarin, S. (2018). Social relations and life satisfaction: the role of friends. Genus, 74(1), Beugelsdijk S ve Van Schaik, T. 2005. “Social Capital and Growth in European Regions: An Empirical test”, European Journal of Political Economy 21(2):301–324.
  4. Blum, T. C. ve Kingston, P. W. 1984, “Homeownership and Social Attachment”, Sociological Perspectives, 27(2): 159-180.
  5. Bourdieu, P. 1986. “The Forms of Capital”. In: John G. Richardson (ed.): Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, 241-258. Buğra, A. 2001 “Non-market mechanisms of market formation: The development of the consumer durables industry in Turkey”, New Perspectives on Turkey, Sayı 19. Costa, D., Kahn, M. 2003. “Civic Engagement and Community Heterogeneity: An Economist's Perspective.” Perspectives on Politics 1 (1): 103-11.
  6. Delhey, J., ve Newton, K. 2005. "Predicting Cross-National Levels of Social Trust: Global Pattern or Nordic Exceptionalism?" European Sociological Review 21 (4): 311-27.
  7. Almond, G.A. and Verba, S., 2015. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes And Democracy In Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  8. Bankston, C, ve Zhou, M. 2002. “Social Capital as a Process: The Meanings and Problems of a Theoretical Metaphor”, Sociological Inquiry 72: 285-317
  9. Coleman, J.S., 1988. “Social Capital In The Creation Of Human Capital”, American Journal Of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
  10. Ekici, T. and Koydemir, S., 2014. “Social capital, government and democracy satisfaction, and happiness in Turkey: A Comparison of Surveys in 1999 and 2008”, Social Indicators Research, 118(3): 1031-1053.
  11. Forsander, A., 2004. “Social capital in the context of immigration and diversity: Economic participation in the Nordic welfare states”, Journal of International Migration and Integration/Revue de l'integration et de la migration Internationale, 5(2): 207-227.
  12. Fukuyama, F., 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues And The Creation Of Prosperity (Vol. 99). New York, NY: Free press. Glaeser EL, Laibson D, Sacerdote B.2002. “An Economic Approach To Social Capital”, Economy Journal, 112(483). Grootaert, C.1999. Social capital, household welfare and poverty in. Indonesia,