SavedAdd your journal

Journals / FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 /

FEMINIST ETHICS OF CARE AND ITS IMPORTANCE FOR SOME NORMATIVE QUESTIONS IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICS

BAKIM/ÖZEN ETİĞİ VE ULUSLARARASI SİYASETİN BAZI NORMATİF SORULARI İÇİN ÖNEMİ

Fatma ARMAĞAN TEKE LLOYD
Pages
255–271
Publication Date
2018-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In reviewing these different feminist approaches to the study of ethics, the article argues that in thinking about the questions of war and justice in international realm, both care ethicists and its critique could be utilized for a more fruitful understanding of the ethical dimensions of our actions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article reviews some of the contributions that the feminist ethics of care framework has made to the study of ethics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although ethics of care framework has raised a successful critique of the masculunist bias inhering within the prominent Western moral theories, some feminist scholars have maintained a critical attitude towards care ethics because of its tendency to essentialize emotions of feminine caring.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In reviewing these different feminist approaches to the study of ethics, the article argues that in thinking about the questions of war and justice in international realm, both care ethicists and its critique could be utilized for a more fruitful understanding of the ethical dimensions of our actions.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:bakım/özen etiği · adalet etiği · uluslararası siyasette etik

Abstract

This article reviews some of the contributions that the feminist ethics of care framework has made to the study of ethics. Although ethics of care framework has raised a successful critique of the masculunist bias inhering within the prominent Western moral theories, some feminist scholars have maintained a critical attitude towards care ethics because of its tendency to essentialize emotions of feminine caring. In reviewing these different feminist approaches to the study of ethics, the article argues that in thinking about the questions of war and justice in international realm, both care ethicists and its critique could be utilized for a more fruitful understanding of the ethical dimensions of our actions.

Özet

Bu makale, feminist bakım/özen etiğinin ahlak felsefesi alanına yaptığı katkılardan bazılarını gözden geçirmektedir. Her ne kadar bakım/özen etiği, Batılı ahlak teorilerinin eril bakış açılarının başarılı bir eleştirisini ortaya koymuş olsa da, bazı feminist düşünürler, bakım/özen etiğine karşı dişil bakıma olan özcül yaklaşımları nedeniyle mesafeli durmuşlardır. Makale etik alanına bu farklı feminist yaklaşımları gözden geçirirken, uluslararası siyasette savaş ve adalet sorularının etik boyutlarını kavramada, iki yaklaşımdan da faydalanabileceğini tartışmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

LLOYD, F. A. T. (2018). FEMINIST ETHICS OF CARE AND ITS IMPORTANCE FOR SOME NORMATIVE QUESTIONS IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICS. FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 255–271. https://ajindex.com/articles/70945

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Bell, L. Re-thinking Ethics in the Midst of Violence: A Feminist Approach to Violence. (Maryland: Rowman &Littlefield Publishers, Inc, 1993).
  2. Card, C. “The Feistiness of Feminism,” in Feminist Ethics, ed. C. Card. (University Press of Kansas, 1991): 3-31.
  3. Cottingham. J. “Ethics and Impartiality,” Philosophical Studies, 43, (1983): 83– 99. Gilligan, C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. (Harvard University Press, 1983).
  4. Held, V. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political and Global. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006). --- How Terrorism is Wrong: Morality and Political Violence. (New York: Oxford University Press; 2008).
  5. Hutchings, K. “Towards A Feminist International Ethics,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 26, (2000): 111-130.
  6. Jaggar, A. “Feminist Ethics: Projects, Problems, Prospects,” in Feminist Ethics, ed. C. Card. (University Press of Kansas, 1991): 78-104.
  7. Noddings, N. Caring: A Feminist Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986).
  8. Nyers, P. “Emergency or Emerging Identities? Refugees and Transformations in World Order,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 28:1, (1999): 1-26. O’Neill, S. Impartiality in Context.(Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997).
  9. Okin, S. “Reason and Feeling in Thinking About Justice,” Ethics, 99, (1999): 229–49.
  10. Pettersen, T. Comprehending Care: Problems and Possibilities in the Ethics of Care. (Rowman & Littlefield, 2008).
  11. Porter, E. “Can Politics Practice Compassion?,” Hypatia, 21;4 (2006): 97-123.
  12. Robinson, F. Globalizing Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory and International Relations. (Oxford: Westview Press, 1999). --- Methods of Feminist Normative Theory: A Political Ethics of Care for International Relations,” in Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, ed. B. Ackerly et al. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006): 221-40. ---Sex Trafficking and The Political Economy of Care (Paper Presented for workshop on “The Political Economy of Care, Transnational Perspectives, 2008).
  13. Ruddick, S. Maternal thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace. (London, Women’s Press, 1990).
  14. Slyvester, C. “Empathetic Cooperation: A Feminist Method for IR,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23:2 (1994): 315-34.
  15. Spelman, E. “The Virtue of Feeling and the Feeling of Virtue,” in Feminist Ethics, ed. C. Card. (University Press of Kansas, 1991): 213-32.
  16. Tong, R. “Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics (review),