Journals / Journal of Teacher Education and Educators / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of the Professional Development Program for Sec-ondary Math Teachers on Item Writing Related to Higher Order Thinking Skills

Pages
83–106
Publication Date
2020-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that the PD program was satisfactory; however, it needed improvement in terms of the total time of the program, time allocated for activities and monitoring and supporting teachers’ work at their institutions of service.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The fact that Turkey’s achievement in large-scale international examinations is not at the expected level is associated with such factors as students, teachers, schools, curricula and assessment approaches.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The program was attended by 100 participants from 20 differ- ent cities of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that the PD program was satisfactory; however, it needed improvement in terms of the total time of the program, time allocated for activities and monitoring and supporting teachers’ work at their institutions of service.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Professional development · program evaluation · item writing

Abstract

The fact that Turkey’s achievement in large-scale international examinations is not at the expected level is associated with such factors as students, teachers, schools, curricula and assessment approaches. The literature links student-related causes mainly to their lack of higher-order thinking skills; and teacher-related causes to incompetency in writing items to measure these skills, and not participating in professional development activities aimed at measurement of the skills tested in these exams. For these reasons, the present study designed, implemented and evaluated a professional development (PD) program to improve secondary math teachers’ skills of writing higher-order items in compliance with Cognitive Diagnostic Models. The study was conducted with Guskey’s ve levels of evaluating teachers’ PD in the holistic single-case design. The program was attended by 100 participants from 20 differ- ent cities of Turkey. During the study, both quantitative and qualitative data concerning the periods before, during and after the program implementations were obtained through pre and post evaluation questionnaires and worksheets. The results indicated that the PD program was satisfactory; however, it needed improvement in terms of the total time of the program, time allocated for activities and monitoring and supporting teachers’ work at their institutions of service. In addition, it was revealed that the context should not be structured in writing higher- order items of mathematics, which involves multiple qualities and mathematical competence.

🔖

Cite This Article

YURDAKUL, B., BAŞOKÇU, T. O., YAZICILAR, Ü. (2020). Evaluation of the Professional Development Program for Sec-ondary Math Teachers on Item Writing Related to Higher Order Thinking Skills. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 83–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/780900

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akyüz, G. (2006). Investigation of the effect of teacher and class characteristics on mathematics achievement in Turkey and European Union countries. Elementary Education Online, 5(2), 75-86.
  2. Aslan, C. (2011). Effects of teaching applications for developing question asking skills on question forming skills of prospective teachers. Education and Science, 36(160), 236-249.
  3. Aydın, A., Selvitopu, A., & Kaya, M. (2018). Resources invested in education and PISA 2015 results: a comparative study. Elementary Education Online, 17(3), 1283-1301. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2018.466346 Aydın, A., Sarıer, Y., & Uysal, Ş. (2012). The comparative assessment of the results of PISA mathematical literacy in terms of socio-economic and socio-cultural variables. Education and Science, 37(164), 20-30.
  4. Aydın, A., Erdağ, C., & Taş, N. (2011). A comparative evaluation of PISA 2003-2006 results in reading literacy skills: An example of top-five OECD countries and Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(2), 665-673.
  5. Aygün, B., Baran-Bulut, D., & İpek, A.S. (2016). The analysis of the primary school mathematics exam questions according to the math taxonomy. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 62-88.
  6. Bayrakçı, M. (2009). In-service teacher training in Japan and Turkey: A comparative analysis of institutions and practices. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 10-22. doi:10.14221/ajte.2009v34n1.2 Baysen, E. (2006). The levels of teacher questions and student answers. Kastamonu Education Journal, 14(1), 21-28.
  7. Bümen, N. T., et al. (2012). Türkiye bağlamında öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi: sorunlar ve öneriler. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 41(194), 31-50.
  8. Çakan, M. (2004). Comparison of elementary and secondary school teachers in terms of their assessment practices and perceptions toward their qualification levels. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 37(2), 99-114. doi:10.1501/Egifak_0000000101 Çalık, B. & Aksu, M. (2018). A systematic review of teachers’ questioning in Turkey between 2000-2018. Elementary Education Online, 17(3), 1548-1565. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2018.466389 Çiftçi, E. (2008). Türkiye’de Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı tarafından müzik öğretmenlerine verilen hizmetiçi eğitimin incelenmesi ve müzik öğretmenlerinin hizmet içi eğitim ihtiyaçlarının belirlenmesi. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Gazi University, Ankara.
  9. Çobanoğlu, R. & Kasapoğlu, K. (2010). The whys and hows of Finnish success at PISA. H. U. Journal of