Journals / Journal of Ekonomi / 2019 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Tourism and innovation: A literature review

Pages
98–154
Publication Date
2019-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This research might be considered as not only an opportunity for contemporary innovation executives to follow up the developments in the theory and update their practices in the sector but also an inspiration for the theorists to discover the gaps and the relatively disregarded niche areas and contribute to the future researches.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is merely evident that innovation is more in the ascendant not only in the practical field but also in theory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus, this study aims to review 235 articles indexed by SSCI, SCI, SCI-E, ESCI and SCOPUS between 1900-2019 in the context of tourism-innovation relationship.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This research might be considered as not only an opportunity for contemporary innovation executives to follow up the developments in the theory and update their practices in the sector but also an inspiration for the theorists to discover the gaps and the relatively disregarded niche areas and contribute to the future researches.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Tourism · Innovation · Bibliometric analysis

Abstract

It is merely evident that innovation is more in the ascendant not only in the practical field but also in theory. However, although innovation seems to be entirely discussed within different business fields, tourism -due to its “service” and “manpower” based nature-, is considered to be one of the relatively stepwise sectors. Thus, this study aims to review 235 articles indexed by SSCI, SCI, SCI-E, ESCI and SCOPUS between 1900-2019 in the context of tourism-innovation relationship. In this review, these articles are grouped under the five themes of Schumpeter (1934) as product innovation, process innovation, market innovation, input innovation and organizational innovation. Among these studies, while process innovation was found to be the most studied subject, product and service innovation was found to be the least studied subject. The most frequently used keyword was found to be innovation itself. Besides it was seen that sustainability in process innovation, perceptions of employees and managers in organizational innovation, business performance and customer satisfaction in service innovation, product development and business performance in product innovation are the most frequently used keywords all through the entire tourism literature. These findings highlight that innovation in tourism research is developing as it does in the manufacturing industry. This research might be considered as not only an opportunity for contemporary innovation executives to follow up the developments in the theory and update their practices in the sector but also an inspiration for the theorists to discover the gaps and the relatively disregarded niche areas and contribute to the future researches.

Özet

It is merely evident that innovation is more in the ascendant not only in the practical field but also in theory. However, although innovation seems to be entirely discussed within different business fields, tourism -due to its “service” and “manpower” based nature-, is considered to be one of the relatively stepwise sectors. Thus, this study aims to review 235 articles indexed by SSCI, SCI, SCI-E, ESCI and SCOPUS between 1900-2019 in the context of tourism-innovation relationship. In this review, these articles are grouped under the five themes of Schumpeter (1934) as product innovation, process innovation, market innovation, input innovation and organizational innovation. Among these studies, while process innovation was found to be the most studied subject, product and service innovation was found to be the least studied subject. The most frequently used keyword was found to be innovation itself. Besides it was seen that sustainability in process innovation, perceptions of employees and managers in organizational innovation, business performance and customer satisfaction in service innovation, product development and business performance in product innovation are the most frequently used keywords all through the entire tourism literature. These findings highlight that innovation in tourism research is developing as it does in the manufacturing industry. This research might be considered as not only an opportunity for contemporary innovation executives to follow up the developments in the theory and update their practices in the sector but also an inspiration for the theorists to discover the gaps and the relatively disregarded niche areas and contribute to the future researches.

🔖

Cite This Article

IŞIK, C., KÜÇÜKALTAN, E. G., TAŞ, S., AKOĞUL, E., UYRUN, A., HAJİYEVA, T., TURAN, B., DIRBO, A. H., BAYRAKTAROĞLU, E. (2019). Tourism and innovation: A literature review. Journal of Ekonomi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 98–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/776200

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aarstad, J., Ness, H. and Haugland, S. A. (2014).
  2. Innovation, Uncertainty, and İnter-Firm Shortcut Ties in A Tourism Destination Context. Tourism Management 48, 354-361.
  3. Acul, H. (2008). KOBİ’lerde Araştırma and Ürün Geliştirme Bölümlerin Çok Yönlü Yapılandırılması and Sistematik Yönetimi Üzerine Öneriler. 5. KOBİ’ler and Verimlilik Kongresi Kongre Kitabı, İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul, pp. 297- 307. Akgunduz, Y., Alkan, C. and Gök, Ö. A. (2018).
  4. Perceived Organizational Support, Employee Creativity and Proactive Personality: The Mediating Effect of Meaning of Work. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 34, 105-114.
  5. Alkier, R., Milojica, V. and Roblek, V. (2017). Challenges of the Social Innovation in Tourism. Tourism in Southern and Eastern Europe 4, 1-13.
  6. Abernathy, W. J. and Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping The Winds of Creative Destruction. Research Policy 14, 3-22.
  7. Aldebert, B., Dang, R. J. and Longhi, C. (2011). Innovation in The Tourism Industry: The Case of Tourism@. Tourism Management 32(5), 1204-1213.
  8. Alegre, I. and Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2016). Social Innovation Success Factors: Hospitality and Tourism Social Enterprises. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 28(6), 1155-1176.
  9. Alfiero, S., Giudice, A. L. and Bonadonna, A. (2017). Street Food and Innovation: The Food Truck Phenomenon. British Food Journal 119(11), 2462-2476.
  10. Ali, A. and Frew, A. J. (2014). Technology Innovation and Applications in Sustainable Destination Development. Information Technology and Tourism 14(4), 265-290.
  11. Alsos, G. A., Eide, D. and Madsen, E. L. (2014). Introduction: Innovation in Tourism Industries. Chapters, 1-24. Handbook of Research on Innovation in Tourism Industries. UK: EdwardElgarPubl. http://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781782548409.00024.xml.
  12. Almeida, M., Rocafort, A. and Borra, F. (2016). Shedding Light on Eco-Innovation in Tourism: A Critical Analysis. Sustainability 8, 1-12.
  13. Andereck, K. L. (2009), Tourist’s Perceptions of Environmentally Responsible Innovations at Tourism Businesses. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 17(4), 489-499.
  14. Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A., Kinkel, S., and Lay, G. (2008), “Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys”, Technovation, 28, pp. 644- 657. Aquino, R. S., Lück, M. and Schänzel, H. A. (2018). A Conceptual Framework of Tourism Social Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Community Development. Journal of Hospitality and T