Tobe successful at work without experience in training people and work formanaging continuous assistance Franchising is the best approach because it is aform of giving a license from the elements.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the study, it is examined the effect of International Franchising Association(UFRAD) on tbe decision making process of franchisee companies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Operating franchising, franchisor has a trademark and thefranchisee sells products under the name of the franchisers areas of advertising,training, management and the benefit as a whole package of 1itera discounts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Tobe successful at work without experience in training people and work formanaging continuous assistance Franchising is the best approach because it is aform of giving a license from the elements.
In the study, it is examined the effect of International Franchising Association(UFRAD) on tbe decision making process of franchisee companies. A surveyhas been carried out on franchisee companies, after the survey interview, resultsare discussed and presented. Franchising offers a useful way to entrepreneurs tostart a new business. Operating franchising, franchisor has a trademark and thefranchisee sells products under the name of the franchisers areas of advertising,training, management and the benefit as a whole package of 1itera discounts. Tobe successful at work without experience in training people and work formanaging continuous assistance Franchising is the best approach because it is aform of giving a license from the elements.
KARADUMAN, İ., ARICI, G. (2016). EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF FRANCHISING ASSOCIATIONS ON FRANCHISING DECISIONS OF COMPANIES IN TURKEY. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 32, 107–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/771791
Anwar, S. T. (2011). Franchising: Category Issues, Changing Dynamics and Competitiveness. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 21(3), 241–255. http://doi.org/10.1108/10569211111165299
Baena, V. (2009). Modeling Global Franchising in Emerging Markets: An Entry Mode Analysis. Journal of East-West Business, 15(3), 164–188. http://doi.org/10.1080/10669860903435921
Cebeci, R. (2005). “Franchising Rehberi”. Ankara:KOSGEB Girişimciliği Destekleme Merkezi Yayınları Combs, J. G., Michael, S. C., & Castrogiovanni, G. J. (2004). Franchising: A review and avenues to greater theoretical diversity. Journal of Management. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.006
Dant, R. P., Gr??nhagen, M., & Windsperger, J. (2011). Franchising Research Frontiers for the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Retailing, 87(3), 253–268. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2011.08.002
De Castro, L. M., Mota, J., & Marnoto, S. (2009). Toward a relational perspective of franchising chains. Service Business, 3(1), 15–30. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-008-0050-6
Doherty, A. M. (2009). Market and partner selection processes in international retail franchising. Journal of Business Research, 62(5), 528–534. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.011
Doherty, A. M., & Quinn, B. (1999). International retail franchising: an agency theory perspective. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 27(6), 224–237. http://doi.org/10.1108/09590559910278588
Elango, B., & Fried, V. H. (1997). Franchising research: A literature review and synthesis. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(3), 68–81.
Hoffman, R. C., & Preble, J. F. (2004). Global franchising: current status and future challenges. Journal of Services Marketing, 18(2), 101–113. http://doi.org/10.1108/08876040410528700
Inma, C. (2005). Purposeful franchising: Re-thinking of the franchising rationale. Singapore Management Review, 27(1), 27–48.
Knight, R. M. (1986). Franchising from the Franchisor and Franchisee Points of View. Journal of Small Business Management, 24(3), 8–15. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=5265171&s ite=ehost-live Lafontaine, F. (1992). Agency Theory and Franchising: S