Dergiler / İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 32

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF FRANCHISING ASSOCIATIONS ON FRANCHISING DECISIONS OF COMPANIES IN TURKEY

Sayfa
107–126
Yayın Tarihi
2016-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Tobe successful at work without experience in training people and work formanaging continuous assistance Franchising is the best approach because it is aform of giving a license from the elements.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In the study, it is examined the effect of International Franchising Association(UFRAD) on tbe decision making process of franchisee companies.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Operating franchising, franchisor has a trademark and thefranchisee sells products under the name of the franchisers areas of advertising,training, management and the benefit as a whole package of 1itera discounts.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Tobe successful at work without experience in training people and work formanaging continuous assistance Franchising is the best approach because it is aform of giving a license from the elements.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:franchising · franchising decisions · franchising associations

Özet

In the study, it is examined the effect of International Franchising Association(UFRAD) on tbe decision making process of franchisee companies. A surveyhas been carried out on franchisee companies, after the survey interview, resultsare discussed and presented. Franchising offers a useful way to entrepreneurs tostart a new business. Operating franchising, franchisor has a trademark and thefranchisee sells products under the name of the franchisers areas of advertising,training, management and the benefit as a whole package of 1itera discounts. Tobe successful at work without experience in training people and work formanaging continuous assistance Franchising is the best approach because it is aform of giving a license from the elements.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARADUMAN, İ., ARICI, G. (2016). EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF FRANCHISING ASSOCIATIONS ON FRANCHISING DECISIONS OF COMPANIES IN TURKEY. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 32, 107–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/771791

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Alon, M. (2006). Service franchising: A global perspective. Service Franchising: A Global Perspective. http://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28256-4
  2. Anwar, S. T. (2011). Franchising: Category Issues, Changing Dynamics and Competitiveness. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 21(3), 241–255. http://doi.org/10.1108/10569211111165299
  3. Asarpota, J. (2014). Global Franchising Operational Issues. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 193–203. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.024
  4. Baena, V. (2009). Modeling Global Franchising in Emerging Markets: An Entry Mode Analysis. Journal of East-West Business, 15(3), 164–188. http://doi.org/10.1080/10669860903435921
  5. Cebeci, R. (2005). “Franchising Rehberi”. Ankara:KOSGEB Girişimciliği Destekleme Merkezi Yayınları Combs, J. G., Michael, S. C., & Castrogiovanni, G. J. (2004). Franchising: A review and avenues to greater theoretical diversity. Journal of Management. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.006
  6. Dant, R. P., Gr??nhagen, M., & Windsperger, J. (2011). Franchising Research Frontiers for the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Retailing, 87(3), 253–268. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2011.08.002
  7. De Castro, L. M., Mota, J., & Marnoto, S. (2009). Toward a relational perspective of franchising chains. Service Business, 3(1), 15–30. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-008-0050-6
  8. Doherty, A. M. (2009). Market and partner selection processes in international retail franchising. Journal of Business Research, 62(5), 528–534. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.011
  9. Doherty, A. M., & Quinn, B. (1999). International retail franchising: an agency theory perspective. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 27(6), 224–237. http://doi.org/10.1108/09590559910278588
  10. Elango, B., & Fried, V. H. (1997). Franchising research: A literature review and synthesis. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(3), 68–81.
  11. Hoffman, R. C., & Preble, J. F. (2004). Global franchising: current status and future challenges. Journal of Services Marketing, 18(2), 101–113. http://doi.org/10.1108/08876040410528700
  12. Inma, C. (2005). Purposeful franchising: Re-thinking of the franchising rationale. Singapore Management Review, 27(1), 27–48.
  13. Knight, R. M. (1986). Franchising from the Franchisor and Franchisee Points of View. Journal of Small Business Management, 24(3), 8–15. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=5265171&s ite=ehost-live Lafontaine, F. (1992). Agency Theory and Franchising: S