Journals / İmalat Teknolojileri ve Uygulamaları / 2022 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

A Review on Machinability of Shape Memory Alloys Through Traditional and Non-Traditional Machining Processes: A Review

Pages
14–32
Publication Date
2022-04-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After all, the article has been concluded by suggesting a variety of key points seen throughout the review process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This review article offers consolidated knowledge on the subject of several traditional and non-traditional procedures that are taking place throughout the years to form shape memory alloys (SMAs).
📊
Key Findings & Data:As well, Numerous of outcomes reactions that may occur during the operation procedures have been emphasized such as material removal rate (MRR), rate of tool wear, surface roughness (SR), the surface integrity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After all, the article has been concluded by suggesting a variety of key points seen throughout the review process.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Traditional machining. · Non-Traditional machining. · Shape memory alloys.

Abstract

This review article offers consolidated knowledge on the subject of several traditional and non-traditional procedures that are taking place throughout the years to form shape memory alloys (SMAs). At the primary part of the review, the usage of several shape memory alloys was shown. The dialogue then continued towards numerous traditional techniques of operating followed by the obstacles in the running of SMAs utilizing traditional techniques of operating. Moreover, numerous non-traditional processes of operations such WJM (Water jet Machining), cryogenic, WEDM (Wire Electro Discharge Machining), EDM (Electro Discharge Machining), and electrochemical machining explored. As well, Numerous of outcomes reactions that may occur during the operation procedures have been emphasized such as material removal rate (MRR), rate of tool wear, surface roughness (SR), the surface integrity. A consolidated records of various academics and their findings on this issue has been evaluated. After all, the article has been concluded by suggesting a variety of key points seen throughout the review process.

Özet

This review article offers consolidated knowledge on the subject of several traditional and non-traditional procedures that are taking place throughout the years to form shape memory alloys (SMAs). At the primary part of the review, the usage of several shape memory alloys was shown. The dialogue then continued towards numerous traditional techniques of operating followed by the obstacles in the running of SMAs utilizing traditional techniques of operating. Moreover, numerous non-traditional processes of operations such WJM (Water jet Machining), cryogenic, WEDM (Wire Electro Discharge Machining), EDM (Electro Discharge Machining), and electrochemical machining explored. As well, Numerous of outcomes reactions that may occur during the operation procedures have been emphasized such as material removal rate (MRR), rate of tool wear, surface roughness (SR), the surface integrity. A consolidated records of various academics and their findings on this issue has been evaluated. After all, the article has been concluded by suggesting a variety of key points seen throughout the review process.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAOUD, F. B., KORKMAZ, M. E. (2022). A Review on Machinability of Shape Memory Alloys Through Traditional and Non-Traditional Machining Processes: A Review. İmalat Teknolojileri ve Uygulamaları, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 14–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/770284

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. D. S. T W Duerig, K N Melton, “Engineering Aspects of Shape Memory Alloys,” in Butterworth-Heinemann, 1990, pp. 5–35
  2. C. M. Wayman, “SOME APPLICATIONS OF SHAPE-MEMORY ALLOYS.,” J. Met., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 129–137, Dec. 1980, doi: 10.1007/bf03354492
  3. L. Kulinsky and M. J. Madou, “9 - BioMEMs for drug delivery applications A2 - Bhansali, Shekhar,” Woodhead Publ. Ser. Biomater., pp. 218–268, 2012
  4. D. J. Hartl and D. C. Lagoudas, “Aerospace applications of shape memory alloys,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G J. Aerosp. Eng., vol. 221, no. 4, pp. 535–552, 2007, doi: 10.1243/09544100JAERO211. [5] “File:Nitinol Austenite and martensite small.jpg - Wikipedia.” [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nitinol_Austenite_and_martensite_small.jpg. [Accessed: 26-Nov-2021]
  5. I. N. QADER, M. KOK, F. Dağdelen, and Y. AYDOĞDU, “‘A review of smart materials: researches and applications,’” El-Cezeri Fen ve Mühendislik Derg., Sep. 2019, doi: 10.31202/ecjse.562177
  6. P. S. Lobo, J. Almeida, and L. Guerreiro, “Shape Memory Alloys Behaviour: A Review,” Procedia Eng., vol. 114, pp. 776–783, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.PROENG.2015.08.025
  7. E. O. Ezugwu, J. Bonney, and Y. Yamane, “An overview of the machinability of aeroengine alloys,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 233–253, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)01042-7
  8. T. KIVAK, K. HABALI, and U. ŞEKER, “The Effect of Cutting Paramaters on The Hole Quality and Tool Wear During The Drilling of Inconel 718,” Gazi Univ. J. Sci., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 533–540, Apr. 2012
  9. D. Manolakos and A. P. Markopoulos, “A review on the machining of Nickel-Titanium shape memory alloys,” Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 42(1), pp. 28-35, Jul. 2015
  10. K. Weinert, V. Petzoldt, and D. Kötter, “Turning and Drilling of NiTi Shape Memory Alloys,” CIRP Ann., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 65–68, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60646-5
  11. K. Weinert and V. Petzoldt, “Machining of NiTi based shape memory alloys,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 378, no. 1-2 SPEC. ISS., pp. 180–184, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1016/J.MSEA.2003.10.344
  12. E. Ezugwu, Á. R. Machado, I. Pashby, and J. Wallbank, “The effect of high-pressure coolant supply when machining a heat-resistant nickel-based superalloy,” undefined, 1991
  13. F. Pusavec, H. Hamdi, J. Kopac, and I. S. Jawahir, “Surface integrity in cryogenic machining of nickel based alloy—Inconel 718,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 211, no. 4, pp. 773–783, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1016