SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Health Management and Tourism / 2017 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3

INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FREQUENCY OF EXPOSURE TO MOBBING AND DEMOGRAPHICAL FEATURES OF MIDWIVES AND NURSES WORKING IN HOSPITALS

Mukaddes Örs
Pages
27–43
Publication Date
2017-12-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found out that the level the midwives were subjected to mobbing was higher than that the nurses were subjected to.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of the present study is to find out whether there is a significant difference between the frequencies with which the midwives and nurses working in hospitals are exposed to mobbing depending on various variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the study comprised 270 midwives (n=76) and nurses (n=194) working in a University Hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found out that the level the midwives were subjected to mobbing was higher than that the nurses were subjected to.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Midwife · nurse · mobbing

Abstract

The objective of the present study is to find out whether there is a significant difference between the frequencies with which the midwives and nurses working in hospitals are exposed to mobbing depending on various variables. The sample of the study comprised 270 midwives (n=76) and nurses (n=194) working in a University Hospital. In the study, the “Scale for Determining the Mobbing Behaviors” in the form of a Likert scale was used. In order to determine the reliability of the scale, its Cronbach Alpha value was calculated. The internal consistency value was found to be 94.22. It was determined that the scores concerning the scale for the level of mobbing differed depending on whether the person is a midwife or a nurse (p<.05). It was determined that the scores obtained in the scale for the level of mobbing did not differ depending on the age and total period of employment of the midwives and nurses (p>.05). It was found out that the level the midwives were subjected to mobbing was higher than that the nurses were subjected to. In analyzing this data, the frequency distribution, t-test and ANOVA analyses were performed.

🔖

Cite This Article

Örs, M. (2017). INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FREQUENCY OF EXPOSURE TO MOBBING AND DEMOGRAPHICAL FEATURES OF MIDWIVES AND NURSES WORKING IN HOSPITALS. International Journal of Health Management and Tourism, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3, 27–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/767348

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Abramis, D. J. (1994).
  2. Work Role Ambiguity, Job Performance: Metaanalyses And Review, Psychol Rep, 75(3), 1411-1433. Amasya University Sabuncuoğlu Şerefeddin Education and Research Hospital. (2015),
  3. Department of Statistics. Aronson, E., Wilson, T.D. and Akert, R. M. (2005). Social Psychology by Pearson Education Inc. New Jersey pp. 475-503.
  4. Bağ, B. (2004). Hemşirelikte Şiddet Görünümleri. Aktif Yayınevi, İstanbul:
  5. Baykal, A. N. (2005). Yutucu Rekabet Kanuni Devrindeki Mobbing’den Günümüze, (1.Baskı). Sistem Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  6. Bulut, H. U. (2007). Ortaöğretim Öğretmenlerinde Psikolojik Şiddet Düzeyi (Mobbing). Niğde Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Niğde. Chappell, D. and Di Martino, V. (2006). Violence at Work. ILO Report, 3.Baskı,
  7. Geneva. Çelik, Y. and Çelik, S.S. (2007). Sexual harassment against nurses in Turkey, Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(2), 200-206.
  8. Çobanoğlu, Ş. (2005).
  9. Mobbing, İşyerinde Duygusal Saldırı ve Mücadele Yöntemleri, Timaş Yayınları,
  10. İstanbul.
  11. Dangaç, Gönül. (2007). Örgütlerde Psikolojik Yıldırma (Mobbıng) Ve Bir Araştırma. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Ana bilim Dalı, yüksek Lisans Tezi, Balıkesir. Davenport, N., Schwartz, R.D., and Elliott, G.P. (2003). Mobbing İşyerinde Duygusal Taciz. (Çev.O.C.Önersoy). Sistem Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  12. Delbel, J.C. De. (2003).
  13. Escalating Workplace Aggression, Nursing Management, 34, 30-34.
  14. Dosler, A. J., Skubic, M. And Mivsek, A.P. (2014). Perception of Mobbing During the Study: Results of a National Quantitative Research among Slovenian Midwifery Students, Coll. Antropol, 38 ( 3), 1009–1015.
  15. Dökmen, Üstün. (2005). Küçük Şeyler. Sistem Yayıncılık, 4.Baskı,
  16. İstanbul.
  17. Dilman, T. (2007). Özel Hastanelerde Çalışan Hemşirelerin Duygusal Tacize Maruz Kalma Durumlarının Belirlenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  18. Duncan, C. And Vittorio, Di, M. (2000).
  19. Violence at Work. Second Edition, Geneva; International Labour Office. Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature, causes and consequences of bullying at work: the norwegian experience, International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2),16-27.
  20. Eliot, A., Timoth, D.W. and Robin, M.A. (2005). Social Pyschology. Pearson Education Inc. New Jersey pp; 475-503.
  21. Eren, E. (2001). Örgütsel Davranış ve Yönetim Psikolojisi. İstanbul:
  22. Sistem Yayıncılık. Field, Tim. (2006). Bullying in a Public Sector Organisation Being Privatised. Retrieved 21 March,