Journals / International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE BUFFALO FARMERS: A CASE OF TURKEY

Pages
89–97
Publication Date
2019-06-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This is positively related to animal production sustainability for Turkey and relevant developing countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, with the sample of Turkey, the relationship between socio-demographic characteristics of the farmers engaged in buffalo breeding and breeders’ level of satisfaction was measured and assessed by Chi-square analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Producer data was retrieved from seven provinces of Turkey via face to face survey in 462 farms watching national dispersion of buffalo farms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This is positively related to animal production sustainability for Turkey and relevant developing countries.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Buffalo · Farmer · Satisfaction

Abstract

In this study, with the sample of Turkey, the relationship between socio-demographic characteristics of the farmers engaged in buffalo breeding and breeders’ level of satisfaction was measured and assessed by Chi-square analysis. Producer data was retrieved from seven provinces of Turkey via face to face survey in 462 farms watching national dispersion of buffalo farms. The relationship analysis yielded us with the criteria that have an impact on buffalo breeders’ decisions and that are not related to the maintenance of activities. There appeared significant relationships between the breeders’ satisfaction level and household size, regional orientation, ownership of technology and reach to information sources, productive process development, indebtedness situation, tendency to continue production and non-agricultural job-seeking behaviour. However, age, education level and farm scale were found as factors not related to breeder satisfaction. Therefore, in an era, where animal products market is facing with rising demand due to rising income levels and health awareness, production and marketing policy development should consider the factors that affect producers as well as those of consumers. This is positively related to animal production sustainability for Turkey and relevant developing countries.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKPINAR, M. G., GÜL, M., TAŞCIOĞLU, Y., KARLI, B., BOZKURT, Y. (2019). ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE BUFFALO FARMERS: A CASE OF TURKEY. International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 89–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/765536

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akbulut, Ç., Yazıcı, F., 2011. The assessment of buffalo milk obtained in Bafra Kızılırmak River Delta and the Delta ecological balance (in Turkish). Samsun Sempozyumu, 13-16 Ekim 2011,
  2. Samsun. Akpinar, M.G., Gül, M., Tascioglu, Y., Karli, B., Bozkurt, Y., 2018. Factors affecting development and profitability of buffalo husbandry: the case of Turkey. Custos e @gronegócio online, 14(1), 211-233.
  3. Amin, M.R., Siddiki, M.A., Kabir, A.K.M.A., Faruque, M.O., Khandaker, Z.H. 2015. Status of buffalo farmers and buffaloes at Subornochar Upazila of Noakhali district in Bangladesh. Progressive Agriculture, 26, 71-78.
  4. Blyth, S.J., 1994. Karl Pearson and the correlation curve. International Statistical Review/ Revue Internationale de Statistique, 62(3), 393-403.Borghese, A., Mazzi, M., 2005. Buffalo population and strategies in the world. In, Borghese A (Ed): Buffalo Production and Research. 1st ed., 1-39 p., Rome, Italy, 2005.
  5. Çiçek, A., Erkan, O., 1996. Research and sampling methods in agricultural economics (in Turkish). Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No 12, Ders Notları Serisi No: 6, 118p. Tokat. Çiçek, H., Gunlu, A., Tandogan, M. 2009. Production function analysis of buffalo fattening enterprises in Afyonkarahisar region of Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8(11), 2158-2163. FAO, 2018. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Division Statistical data. Available at:. Accessed on: Aug. 02, 2018.
  6. Göğüş, A.K., 1986. Meat technology (in Turkish). Ankara University, Faculty of Agriculture Publications: 991, 243 p. Ankara.
  7. Gökalp, H.Y., 1986. Meat science, lecture notes (in Turkish). Ataturk University Faculty of Agriculture. Erzurum. Günlü, A., Çiçek, H., Tandoğan, M., 2010. Socio-economic analysis of dairy buffalo enterprises in Afyonkarahisar province in Turkey. Journal of Food, Agriculture &Environment, 8 (3&4), 689-691.
  8. Han, Y., Tez, Ş., İpek, P., Vural, M.E., Karataş, A., Keskin, B., Bakır, G., 2015. Some yield features of Anatolian water buffaloes grown people's hand in Diyarbakir province. 7th Balkan Conference on Animal Science, June 3–6,
  9. Sarajevo.Işık, M., Gül, M., 2016. Economic and social structures of water buffalo farming in Muş province of Turkey. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 45(7), 400-408.
  10. Kader, G.D., Franklin, C.A., 2008. Data analysis and probability. The Mathematics Teacher, 102(4):292-299.
  11. Karli, B., Ertatiş, F., Yüksel, F., Tekin, A., Gül, M., 2017. Determination of red meat c