Journals / International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 2

INTEGRATING UAV-BASED THERMAL IMAGING, DREB EXPRESSION, AND AGRONOMIC INDICES TO EVALUATE DROUGHT TOLERANCE IN DIVERSE TRITICUM SPECIES

Oğuzhan Önal(ESKISEHIR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-8745-2488
İmren Kutlu(ESKISEHIR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3505-1479
Koç Mehmet Tuğrul(ESKISEHIR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-2111-4050
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings suggest that breeding programs should prioritize the incorporation of vegetative transcriptional traits associated with effective canopy temperature homeostasis into elite genetic backgrounds.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Selecting ideal drought-tolerant wheat varieties requires a holistic synthesis of digital phenotypes, molecular markers, and agronomic indices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study evaluated 16 wheat genotypes for drought tolerance by integrating digital phenotyping (UAV-based thermal imaging), molecular data (DREB gene expression profiles), and 12 agronomic indices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings suggest that breeding programs should prioritize the incorporation of vegetative transcriptional traits associated with effective canopy temperature homeostasis into elite genetic backgrounds.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Transcriptional Regulation · Crop Water Stress · Digital Phenotyping

Abstract

Selecting ideal drought-tolerant wheat varieties requires a holistic synthesis of digital phenotypes, molecular markers, and agronomic indices. This study evaluated 16 wheat genotypes for drought tolerance by integrating digital phenotyping (UAV-based thermal imaging), molecular data (DREB gene expression profiles), and 12 agronomic indices. While vegetative DREB accumulation remained mostly homogeneous, the generative stage triggered pronounced transcriptional shifts, and late-stage thermal screening revealed highly significant genotypic differences during grain filling. A multivariate PCA biplot identified early canopy temperature differences during tillering (ΔCT_TL) as the most informative non-destructive selection indicator. ΔCT_TL showed a strong positive association with terminal yield stability metrics (YSI and RSI) and a marked negative relationship with the drought sensitivity index (SDI). This early canopy temperature regulation contributed to the maintenance of yield stability in the modern hexaploid variety MFTBY-T and advanced tetraploid lines OR2-T and OR4-S. In contrast, poorly adapted ancient varieties (P5-S and S3-S) exhibited high drought sensitivity accompanied by pronounced late-stage induction of DREB1 and DREB2, suggesting a delayed stress-response mechanism activated under severe tissue dehydration. Conversely, the modern tetraploid variety KZLTN-T and hexaploid landraces appeared to rely on an early vegetative molecular priming strategy. These findings suggest that breeding programs should prioritize the incorporation of vegetative transcriptional traits associated with effective canopy temperature homeostasis into elite genetic backgrounds.

🔖

Cite This Article

Önal, O., Kutlu, İ., Tuğrul, K. M. (2026). INTEGRATING UAV-BASED THERMAL IMAGING, DREB EXPRESSION, AND AGRONOMIC INDICES TO EVALUATE DROUGHT TOLERANCE IN DIVERSE TRITICUM SPECIES. International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences, Volume: 10 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.66598/ijafls.1964815

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (47)

  1. Agarwal, P., Agarwal, P. K., Joshi, A. J., Sopory, S. K., Reddy, M. K. (2010). Overexpression of PgDREB2A transcription factor enhances abiotic stress tolerance and activates downstream stress-responsive genes. Mol. Biol. Rep., 37.2, 1125-1135.
  2. Agarwal, P. K., Gupta, K., Lopato, S., Agarwal, P. (2017). Dehydration responsive element binding transcription factors and their applications for the engineering of stress tolerance. J. Exp. Bot., 68.9, 2135-2148. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx118
  3. Akman, H., Yildirim, E., Bağci, S. A. (2023). Unravelling phenotypic diversity of root system architecture in ancient wheat species versus modern wheat cultivars. Not. Sci. Biol., 15.4, 11703. https://doi.org/10.55779/nsb15411703
  4. Bidinger, F. R., Mahalakshmi, V., Rao, G. D. P. (1987). Assessment of drought resistance in pearl millet [Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke]. I. Factors affecting yields under stress. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 38.1, 37-48.
  5. Bouslama, M., Schapaugh Jr, W. T. (1984). Stress tolerance in soybeans. I. Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance 1. Crop Sci., 24.5, 933-937.
  6. Chappell, D. G. (2016). Canopy Spectral Reflectance as an Indirect Selection Tool for Yield in Wheat, University of Missouri-Columbia and Faculty of Graduate School, Columbia. 115 p.
  7. Cooper, M., Messina, C. D., Podlich, D., Totir, L. R., Baumgarten, A., Hausmann, N. J., Wright, S., Graham, G. (2014). Predicting the future of plant breeding: complementing empirical evaluation with genetic prediction. Crop Pasture Sci., 65.4, 311-336. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP14007
  8. Dehghani, I., Mostajeran, A., Esmaeili, A., Ghannadian, M. (2019). The role of DREB2 gene in drought tolerance of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) associated with Azospirillum brasilense. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res., 17.2, 4385-4399.
  9. Devi, E. L., Kumar, S., Singh, T. B., Sharma, S. K., Beemrote, A., Devi, C. P., Chongtham, S. K., Singh, C. H., Wani, S. H. (2017). Adaptation strategies and defence mechanisms of plants during environmental stress. In: Medicinal plants and environmental challenges. Vol. 1, Springer, Cham, 359-413.
  10. Farshadfar, E., Javadinia, J. (2011). Evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for drought tolerance. Seed Plant Improv. J., 27.4, 517–537.
  11. Fernandez, G. C. (1992). Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Adaptation of food crops to temperature and water stress. Vol. 1, AVRDC, Shanhua, 257–270.
  12. Firoozi, B., Sofalian, O., Shokrpour, M., Rasoulzadeh, A., Ahmadpoor, F. (2012). Assessment of drought tolerance indices and their relation with ISSR markers in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Not. Sci. Biol., 4.3, 143-150.
  13. Fischer, R. A., Wood, J. T. (1979). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. III.* Yield associations with morpho-physiological traits. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 30.6, 1001-1020. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9791001
  14. Gaikwad, K. B., Mazumder, A. K., Kumar, M., Singh, A., Ansari, R., Saifi, N.,. Yadav, R. (2025). Evaluating heat and drought resilience in ancient Indian Dwarf wheat Triticum sphaerococcum Percival using stress tolerance indices. Sci. Rep., 15.1, 18970. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02502-0
  15. Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M., Campanile, R. G., Ricciardi, G. L., Borghi, B. (1997). Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Can. J. Plant Sci., 77.4, 523–531.
  16. Gerhards, M., Schlerf, M., Mallick, K., Udelhoven, T. (2019). Challenges and future perspectives of multi-/Hyperspectral thermal infrared remote sensing for crop water-stress detection: A review. Remote Sens., 11.10, 1240.
  17. Hossain, A., Skalicky, M., Brestic, M., Maitra, S., Ashraful Alam, M., Syed, M. A., Islam, T. (2021). Consequences and mitigation strategies of abiotic stresses in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under the changing climate. Agronomy, 11.2, 241.
  18. Jalili, A., Sabouri, H., Shoaei, Z. (2026). A comprehensive web-based platform for calculation of abiotic stress tolerance indices in plant breeding. Sci. Rep., 16.1, 4321. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38957-y
  19. Kazerani, B., Navabpour, S. (2019). Induced genes expression pattern in response to drought stress at seedling stage of wheat. J. Plant Physiol. Breeding, 9.1, 111-128. 10.22034/jppb.2019.10388
  20. Khan, M. K., Pandey, A., Hamurcu, M., Gezgin, S. (2025). Wheat Wild Relatives: Developing Abiotic Stress Tolerance under Climate Change. Vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 450 p.
  21. Kumar, R., Masthigowda, M. H., Kaur, A., Bhusal, N., Pandey, A., Kumar, S.,. Singh, G. P. (2020). Identification and characterization of multiple abiotic stress tolerance genes in wheat. Mol. Biol. Rep., 47.11, 8629-8643.
  22. Kumar, U., Mishra, S., Mahobe, P., Kujur, V. K., Pandey, R., Markam, R. (2026). Drought tolerance in major crops: physiological traits and breeding strategies. Plant Arch., 26.1, 581-590.
  23. Lan, J. (1998). Comparison of evaluating methods for agronomic drought resistance in crops. Acta Agric. Boreali-Occidentalis Sin., 7, 85-87.
  24. Li, D., Bai, D., Tian, Y., Li, Y. H., Zhao, C., Wang, Q.,. Qiu, L. J. (2023). Time series canopy phenotyping enables the identification of genetic variants controlling dynamic phenotypes in soybean. J. Integr. Plant Biol., 65.1, 117-132.
  25. Marone, D., Russo, M. A., Mores, A., Ficco, D. B., Laidò, G., Mastrangelo, A. M., Borrelli, G. M. (2021). Importance of landraces in cereal breeding for stress tolerance. Plants, 10.7, 1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071267
  26. Mei, F., Chen, B., Du, L., Li, S., Zhu, D., Chen, N.,. Mao, H. (2022). A gain-of-function allele of a DREB transcription factor gene ameliorates drought tolerance in wheat. Plant Cell, 34.11, 4472-4494.
  27. Mir, R. R., Reynolds, M., Pinto, F., Khan, M. A., Bhat, M. A. (2019). High-throughput phenotyping for crop improvement in the genomics era. Plant Sci., 282, 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.01.007
  28. Moosavi, S. S., Yazdi Samadi, B., Naghavi, M. R., Zali, A. A., Dashti, H., Pourshahbazi, A. (2008). Introduction of new indices to identify relative drought tolerance and resistance in wheat genotypes. Desert, 12.2, 165-178.
  29. Pfaffl, M. W. (2001). A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT–PCR. Nucleic Acids Res., 29.9, e45. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.9.e45
  30. Ramírez-Cuesta, J. M., Martínez-Gimeno, M. A., Badal, E., Tasa, M., Bonet, L., Pérez-Pérez, J. G. (2025). UAV-based multispectral and thermal indexes for estimating crop water status and yield on super-high-density olive orchards under deficit irrigation conditions. Precision Agric., 26.3, 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-025-10240-6
  31. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2023). Available online at: https://www.R-project.org/ (Accessed May 14, 2026).
  32. Rosielle, A. A., Hamblin, J. (1981). Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non‐stress environment 1. Crop Sci., 21.6, 943-946. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x
  33. Rustamova, S., Shrestha, A., Naz, A. A., Huseynova, I. (2021). Expression profiling of DREB1 and evaluation of vegetation indices in contrasting wheat genotypes exposed to drought stress. Plant Gene, 25, 100266.
  34. Sheikh, M., Iqra, F., Ambreen, H., Pravin, K. A., Ikra, M., Chung, Y. S. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence and high-throughput phenotyping for crop improvement. J. Integr. Agric., 23.6, 1787-1782.
  35. Thakur, V., Rane, J., Nankar, A. N. (2022). Comparative analysis of canopy cooling in wheat under high temperature and drought stress. Agronomy, 12.4, 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040978
  36. Todingan, A. K., Pailang, A. A., Hala, Y. (2025). DREB1 Gene in Regulating Drought Tolerance in Cereal Plants. Bioeksperimen: J. Penelit. Biol., 11.1, 16-28. https://doi.org/10.23917/bioeksperimen.v11i1.10172
  37. Tsenov, N., Nankova, M. (2025). Delineation of wheat varieties suitable for stress and non-stress conditions using yield-based productivity and tolerance indices. Genetika, 57.2, 299-314.
  38. Tüzüner, A. (1990). Handbook of Soil and Water Analysis Laboratories [in Turkish]. General Directorate of Rural Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Affairs, Ankara, Türkiye.
  39. Vadez, V., Grondin, A., Chenu, K., Henry, A., Laplaze, L., Millet, E. J., Carminati, A. (2024). Crop traits and production under drought. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 5.3, 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00514-w
  40. Yoon, Y., Seo, D. H., Shin, H., Kim, H. J., Kim, C. M., Jang, G. (2020). The role of stress-responsive transcription factors in modulating abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Agronomy, 10.6, 788. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060788
  41. Zhou, Z., Majeed, Y., Naranjo, G. D., Gambacorta, E. M. (2021). Assessment for crop water stress with infrared thermal imagery in precision agriculture: A review and future prospects for deep learning applications. Comput. Electron. Agric., 182, 106019. 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106019
  42. Zhu, Y., Wang, H., Jia, W., Wei, X., Duan, Z., Qi, Q.,. Duan, H. (2021). Response of wheat DREB transcription factor to drought stress based on DNA methylation. J. Plant Growth Regul., 40.5, 2035–2046.
  43. Gaikwad, K. B., Mazumder, A. K., Kumar, M., Singh, A., Ansari, R., Saifi, N.,. Yadav, R. (2025). Evaluating heat and drought resilience in ancient Indian Dwarf wheat Triticum sphaerococcum Percival using stress tolerance indices. Sci. Rep., 15.1, 18970. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02502-0
  44. Kumar, R., Masthigowda, M. H., Kaur, A., Bhusal, N., Pandey, A., Kumar, S.,. Singh, G. P. (2020). Identification and characterization of multiple abiotic stress tolerance genes in wheat. Mol. Biol. Rep., 47.11, 8629-8643.
  45. Li, D., Bai, D., Tian, Y., Li, Y. H., Zhao, C., Wang, Q.,. Qiu, L. J. (2023). Time series canopy phenotyping enables the identification of genetic variants controlling dynamic phenotypes in soybean. J. Integr. Plant Biol., 65.1, 117-132.
  46. Mei, F., Chen, B., Du, L., Li, S., Zhu, D., Chen, N.,. Mao, H. (2022). A gain-of-function allele of a DREB transcription factor gene ameliorates drought tolerance in wheat. Plant Cell, 34.11, 4472-4494.
  47. Zhu, Y., Wang, H., Jia, W., Wei, X., Duan, Z., Qi, Q.,. Duan, H. (2021). Response of wheat DREB transcription factor to drought stress based on DNA methylation. J. Plant Growth Regul., 40.5, 2035–2046.