Journals / International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

CONSUMER PREFERENCES OF ORGANIC PRODUCTS FOR ROMANIA

Pages
47–55
Publication Date
2018-12-08
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Non-conventional tools and increased consumer awareness are essential to increase the demand and corresponding farmer orientation on organic agricultural production.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The holistic production systems have been gaining more attention from the agricultural producer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Due to the survey results of 2018, it was understood that demand for organic agriculture and its outputs is still a quality-price comparison matter for consumers and people with lower per capita income require price motivators.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Non-conventional tools and increased consumer awareness are essential to increase the demand and corresponding farmer orientation on organic agricultural production.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:organic agricultural products · demand · marketing

Abstract

The holistic production systems have been gaining more attention from the agricultural producer. This is due to the rising demand from the society and attached with increasing health concerns. While this is valid for developed countries, it is also gaining attention in developing countries as well. Driving out of these facts, it was intended to overview the consumer decision making process for organic agricultural products, specifically fresh fruits and vegetables and legumes by utilising primary data retrieved from Timisoara province of Romania. Due to the survey results of 2018, it was understood that demand for organic agriculture and its outputs is still a quality-price comparison matter for consumers and people with lower per capita income require price motivators. Yet, with rising income and level of education, quality-price assessment becomes more prevalent and people demand more variety of products. This confirms the income-demand co-movement for non-conventional products. It was understood that there is an interest for organic agricultural and food products in Romania as well, yet the level information is limited. Consumers are willing to be acknowledged but do not consider the conventional promotion tools as satisfactory. Non-conventional tools and increased consumer awareness are essential to increase the demand and corresponding farmer orientation on organic agricultural production.

🔖

Cite This Article

CEYLAN, F., AKPINAR, M. G., CHERCIOV, A., OZKAN, B., GUL, M. (2018). CONSUMER PREFERENCES OF ORGANIC PRODUCTS FOR ROMANIA. International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 47–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/765560

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bagozzi, R.P., Dholakia, U.M., 1999. Goal setting and goal striving in consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing 63:19-32.
  2. Maggie, K.L., Ajuruchukwu, O., 2014. Analysis of Production and Consumption of Organic Products in South Africa. In Organic Agriculture Towards Sustainability, Edited by: Prof. Vytautas Pilipavicius. ISBN: 978-953-51-1340-9,
  3. In Tech, DOI: 10.5772/58356. Maxwell, S. 2001. An expanded price/brand effect model. A demonstration of heterogeneity in global consumption. International Marketing Review 18(3):325-343.
  4. Soderlund, M., 1998. Customer satisfaction and its consequences on customer behaviour revisited: The impact of different levels of satisfaction on word‐of‐mouth, feedback to thesupplier and loyalty. International Journal of Service Industry Management 9(2):169-171.
  5. Mulero, J., Pardo, F., Zafrilla, P., 2010. Antioxidant activity and phenolic composition of organic and conventional grapes and wines. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 23(6):569–574. ISSN 1096-0481.
  6. Morris, C., Hopkins, A., Winter, M., 2001. Comparison of the Social, economic and environmental effects of organic, ICM and conventional farming. Final Report to the Countryside Agency, Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, 155p. Gil, J.M., Gracia A., Sanchez M., 2000. Market segmentation and willingness to pay for organic products in Spain. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 3(2): 207-226. Johansson J., 1999. Organic farming possibilities to increase organic cereals production in Skåne: A comparative study of Sweden and Denmark. MSc, Lund University, International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund (2000:4), 71pp. Inci, H., Karakaya, E, Şengül, A.Y., 2017. Organik ürün tüketimini etkileyen faktörler (Diyarbakır ili örneği) – Factors affecting organic product consumption (example from Diyarbakir province). KSU J. Nat. Sci 20(2):137-147. Kozelová, D., Fikselová, M., Vietoris, V., Czako, P., 2013. Analysis of the Slovak consumer behaviour regarding the organic food purchase. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun 61:2343-2350.
  7. Myers, S., Rorie, S., 2000. Facts and Stats: the Year in Review. Organic & Natural News 20-25.Vandeman, A., Hayden, B., 1997. New law paves way for expanding organic market. Food Review: The Magazine of Food Economics 20(2):28-32.
  8. Roman, G.V., 2010. Ituaţia Agriculturii Ecologice în România. [cit. 2014–08–15]; (cited in: Vietoris et al. 2016.)
  9. Dabija, D.C., Pop, N. Al, 2013. The Changing Busine