Evaluation of Morphological, Quality and Yield Characteristics of Some Registered Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties in The Eastern-Mediterranean Region

In terms of quality values for both growing seasons of 2014 and 2015, the average protein analysis values of the Trial were 21.90% for the Hasanbey variety as the highest and 10.26% for the Hisar variety as the lowest values.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯

Objective & Hypothesis:This research was conducted to evaluate regional adaptation of registered chickpea varieties, their yield and some yield related characteristics observed at trial fields under winter growth conditions in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey in Adana location during 2014 and 2015.

📊

Key Findings & Data:In this study, 17 registered varieties and 3 control varieties in total 20 varieties were tested in trials.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:In terms of quality values for both growing seasons of 2014 and 2015, the average protein analysis values of the Trial were 21.90% for the Hasanbey variety as the highest and 10.26% for the Hisar variety as the lowest values.

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:2014 Verileri

⚙️Variables:Chickpea · registered varieties · adaptation

Abstract

This research was conducted to evaluate regional adaptation of registered chickpea varieties, their yield and some yield related characteristics observed at trial fields under winter growth conditions in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey in Adana location during 2014 and 2015. Trials were conducted in fields of Eastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute. In this study, 17 registered varieties and 3 control varieties in total 20 varieties were tested in trials. During this study, the varieties were evaluated in Adana location for their fitness to winter growth conditions. The highest and the lowest yield resulted in 2014 for Adana location were 3.94 t/ha and 1.76 t/ha for Trial, and respectively. In 2015, the highest and the lowest yield resulted for Adana location were 5.08 t/ha and 0.17 t/ha for Trial, respectively. In terms of quality values for both growing seasons of 2014 and 2015, the average protein analysis values of the Trial were 21.90% for the Hasanbey variety as the highest and 10.26% for the Hisar variety as the lowest values.

Keywords

Chickpea registered varieties adaptation sowing date

🔖

Cite This Article

MART, D., TÜRKERİ, M., AKIN, R., ATMACA, E., DUMRUL, S. E., ÇANKAYA, N., ÖKTEM, A. G., YÜCEL, D., KARAKÖY, T., MART, S., ANLARSAL, A. E. (2021). Evaluation of Morphological, Quality and Yield Characteristics of Some Registered Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties in The Eastern-Mediterranean Region. Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 116–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/753100

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

Anonymous, (2021). FAO. https:// www. fao. org/ faostat/ Amir Y, Haenni A L and Youyou A, (2006). Differences in the biochemical composition of dry legumes cultivated in North Algeria. EJEAFChe, 5(3); 1411-1418.
Amini A, Ghannadha M and Abd-Mishani C, (2002). Genetic diversity and correlation between different traits in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Iranian J. of Agricultural Sci., 33(4), 605-615.
Anlarsal AE, Yücel C, Özveren D, (1999). A study to identify the parameters of yield and yield components for Chickpea in Eastern Mediterranean region. Turkish Field Crop Congress Third edition (Forage Crops and Edible Grain Legumes), pp:342- 347,15-18
November, Adana. Atmaca E, (2008). A study to identify the effect of different sowing date and density on the chickpea yield and quality paramaters under Eskişehir conditions, PhD Thesis, 90 s., Ankara Babagil GE, (2011). Investigating the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties for yield and yield paramaters in ecological conditions of Erzurum. Anatolia Agricultural Journal, 26(2):122- 127. Bakoğlu A, (2009). A study to investigate the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties for yield and yield paramaters in ecological conditions of Elazığ. Harran University, Journal of Agricultural Faculty. 13(1):1-6.
Bayraktar H, Dolar FS and Tör M, (2007). Determination of genetic diversity within Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labr., the cause of Ascochyta blight of chickpea in Turkey. Journal of Plant Pathology 89(3):341-347.
Cin ST, Topal N, (2021); Determination of some quality characteristics in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes and relationships between characteristics, Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 9(1): 130-136.
Erdemci İ, Yaşar M, Koç M, (2016). Evaluation of selection criteria i̇n winter chickpea using correlation coefficient and path analysis. YYU Tar. Bil. Derg. (YYU J Agr. Sci.), 26(1):1-6
Gül MK, Egesel CÖ, Kahrıman F, Tayyar Ş, (2006). Potentiality to grow winter chickpea in Çanakkale region. Uludag University, Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 20(1):57-66
Kahraman A, Ceyhan E, Harmankaya M, (2015). Nutritional variation and drought tolerance in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Elem., 20(2): 331-341.DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2014.19.2.67 Kaiser W J and Kusmenoglu I, (1997). Distribution of mating types and the teleomorph of Ascochyta rabiei on chickpea in Turkey. Plant Disease 81:1284-1287. Kalefetoğlu Macar T and Ekmekçi Y, (2009). Alterations in photochemical and physiological act