Journals / Eğitim ve Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

DELVING INTO the EFFECT of ARGUMENTATION BASED INQUIRY APPROACH on LEARNING SCIENCE from MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES

FARKLI PERSPEKTİFLERDEN ARGÜMANTASYON TABANLI ÖĞRENME YAKLAŞIMININ BİLİM ÖĞRENME ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİNİN DERİNLEMESİNE İNCELENMESİ

Pages
23–44
Publication Date
2014-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The factors affecting student learning within the ABI process was outlined as follows: student involvement in the handson process with the generation of own questions, making investigations and designing experiments, collecting data through the observations and experiments, and generation of claims and evidence based on the findings

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact of implementing Argument Based Inquiry (ABI) Approach on students’ science achievements from students’ and teacher’s perspectives through quantitative and qualitative data analyses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study involved 7th and 8th grade students and their science teacher from northeast of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The factors affecting student learning within the ABI process was outlined as follows: student involvement in the handson process with the generation of own questions, making investigations and designing experiments, collecting data through the observations and experiments, and generation of claims and evidence based on the findings
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Argümantasyon · Öğrenme · Fen Eğitimi

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact of implementing Argument Based Inquiry (ABI) Approach on students’ science achievements from students’ and teacher’s perspectives through quantitative and qualitative data analyses. In the research, explanatory design within mixed methods has been implemented. The study involved 7th and 8th grade students and their science teacher from northeast of Turkey. A total of 39 students participated in this study were randomly assigned to the comparison and treatment groups. As data collection tools science achievement test and semistructured interviews from students and teacher were used in the research. While science achievement tests were implemented at the begging and the end of the unit, the semi-structured interviews were conducted upon completion of the unit with teacher and 10 students in the treatment group. The results revealed that the ABI approach had significant impact on treatment group students’ conceptual understanding of science when it is compared to those in the comparison group. The factors affecting student learning within the ABI process was outlined as follows: student involvement in the handson process with the generation of own questions, making investigations and designing experiments, collecting data through the observations and experiments, and generation of claims and evidence based on the findings

Özet

Bu araştırma Argümantasyon Tabanlı Bilim Öğrenme Yaklaşımı (ATBÖ) uygulamalarının öğrencilerin fen başarıları üzerine etkisinin öğrenci ve öğretmen gözünden derinlemesine ve boylamsal değerlendirilmesini hedeflemektedir. Araştırmada karma araştırma yöntemlerinden açıklayıcı desen kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini, amaçsal örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen Türkiye’nin kuzeydoğusunda yer alan bir il merkezindeki ortaokulda öğrenim gören toplam 39 öğrenci ve bu öğrencilerin fen bilgisi öğretmeni oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada aynı öğrencilerin 7. sınıf ve 8. sınıf uygulamalarına yer verilmiştir. Veriler; ünite tabanlı fen başarı testi ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yolu ile elde edilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonunda öğretmen ve uygulama grubundan 10 öğrenci ile yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, ATBÖ yaklaşımının öğrencilerin ünite tabanlı fen başarılarının istatistiksel anlamlı düzeyde artmasına kakı sağladığını göstermiştir. Öğrenci ve öğretmen görüşmelerinden elde edilen sonuçlar paralelinde öğrencilerin öğrenmelerini sağlayan etkenler; öğrencilerin kendi sorularını oluşturmaları, araştırmalar yapıp deneyler tasarlamaları, yaptıkları gözlem ve deneylerden veriler toplamları ve bulduklarından yola çıkarak iddia ve deliller oluşturmaları yolu ile sürece yaparak ve yaşayarak katılmalarıdır

🔖

Cite This Article

YEŞİLDAĞ-HASANÇEBİ, F., GÜNEL, M. (2014). DELVING INTO the EFFECT of ARGUMENTATION BASED INQUIRY APPROACH on LEARNING SCIENCE from MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES. Eğitim ve Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 23–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/752948

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. implementations. The student role was defined as communicating and collaborating effectively while inquiring the knowledge with their peers. In this context, the ABI approach provides opportunities with teachers to implement inquiry-based activities within the classroom environments. Within the scope of this study, recommendations for future research are as follows: investigating how the ABI approach affects teacher pedagogy and resulting effects of a change in the teacher pedagogy; examining the ABI process, impacts of it, confronted difficulties, and possible solutions by longitudinal studies; and investigation of the effect of ABI process on students within different grade levels, and from different socio-economic and socio-cultural status. Possible suggestions for the researcher and teachers practicing the ABI approach are as follows: Ensuring the sustainability of the teacher ABI implementations to reflect the practices into learning environments effectively and teacher writing of reflections of an implementation to better organize subsequent ABI practices. Additionally, teachers should pay attention to whether student questions generated at the beginning of the process are clear, intelligible and feasible. This will provide achievement of the educational goals and effective functioning of the process. Akpinar, E. & Ergin, O. (2005). Yapılandırmacı kuramda fen öğretmeninin rolü. İlköğretim Online, 4(2), 55-64, 2005.
  2. Arkun, S. & Askar, P. (2010). Yapılandırmacı öğrenme ortamlarını değerlendirme ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39, 32-43.
  3. Burke, K. A., Greenbowe T. J., & Hand, B. M. (2006). Implementing the science writing heuristic in the chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 83 (7), 1032- 1038. Buyukozturk, Ş., Kılıc-Cakmak, E., Akgun, Ö. E., Karadeniz, S. & Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. (7. Baskı). Ankara:
  4. Pegem Yayıncılık. Cavagnetto, A. R., Hand, B., & Norten-Meier, L. (2010). Negotiating the ınquiry question: A comparison of whole class and small group strategies in grade five science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 41 (2), 193-209.
  5. Chin, C. & Osborne, J. (2010). Students’ questions and discursive ınteraction: their ımpact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Scıence Teachıng, 47 (7), 883–908
  6. Choi, A., Notebaert, A., Diaz, J., & Hand, B. (2010). Examining arguments generated by year 5, 7, and 10 students in