SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

TEACHER CANDIDATES’ VIEWS ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KALKINMAYA YÖNELİK GÖRÜŞLERİ

Meryem SELVİ
Mahmut SELVİ
Ezgi GÜVEN YILDIRIM
Ayşe Nesibe KÖKLÜKAYA
Pages
87–104
Publication Date
2018-06-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The research reveals that teacher candidates are not knowledgeable enough about sustainable development and its importance, and that they do not have enough activities regarding sustainable development.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to evaluate teacher candidates’ views about sustainable development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 35 participants, chosen by purposive sampling among teacher candidates who were students in various teaching programs in an education faculty of a public university, form the study group of this research.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The research reveals that teacher candidates are not knowledgeable enough about sustainable development and its importance, and that they do not have enough activities regarding sustainable development.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çevre · sürdürülebilir kalkınma · Environment

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to evaluate teacher candidates’ views about sustainable development. In this study, phenomenological method, one of the qualitative research methods, was used to gather data appropriate for the aim of the research. A total of 35 participants, chosen by purposive sampling among teacher candidates who were students in various teaching programs in an education faculty of a public university, form the study group of this research. The research data were gathered by means of semi-structured interviews and content analysis was used to analyze the obtained qualitative data. The research reveals that teacher candidates are not knowledgeable enough about sustainable development and its importance, and that they do not have enough activities regarding sustainable development.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı öğretmen adaylarının sürdürülebilir kalkınmaya ilişkin görüşlerini almak ve bu görüşleri değerlendirmektir. Bu araştırmada araştırmanın amacına uygun verileri toplamak için nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden biri olan fenomenolojik (olgu bilim) yöntem kullanılmıştır. Verilerin toplandığı katılımcılar amaçlı örnekleme ile toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu devlet üniversitelerinin çeşitli öğretmenlik lisans programlarında öğrenim gören 22’si kız ve 13’ü erkek olmak üzere toplam 35 öğretmen adayı oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın verileri yarı-yapılandırılmış görüşme soruları ile toplanmıştır. Elde edilen nitel verilerin çözümlenmesi için nitel veri analiz yöntemlerinden içerik analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda öğretmen adaylarının sürdürülebilir kalkınmanın ne olduğuna ve önemine ilişkin yeteri kadar bilgi sahibi olmadıkları, sürdürülebilir kalkınmaya yönelik çok fazla faaliyette bulunmadıkları sonucu ortaya çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SELVİ, M., SELVİ, M., YILDIRIM, E. G., KÖKLÜKAYA, A. N. (2018). TEACHER CANDIDATES’ VIEWS ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Eğitim ve Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 87–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/752899

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akturan, U. & Esen, A. (2008). Phenomenology. T. Baş & U. Akturan (Ed.), In Qualitative research methods. (pp. 27-37). Ankara:
  2. Seçkin. America, C. (2014). Understanding economic and management sciences teachers’ conceptions of sustainable development. Perspectives in Education, 32(3), 159-171.
  3. Berglund, T., Gericke, N. & Rundgren S.C. (2014). The implementation of education for sustainable development in Sweden: investigating the sustainability consciousness among upper secondary students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(3), 318-339. DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2014.944493 Birdsall, S. (2006). Sharing wisdom for our future. environmental education in action. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference of the Australian Association of Environmental Education, 261-264.
  4. Borg, C., Gericke, N., Höglund, H.O. & Bergman, E. (2014) Subject and experience-bound differences in teachers’ conceptual understanding of sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 20(4), 526-551.
  5. Burmeister, M. & Eilks, I. (2013). An understanding of sustainability and education for sustainable development among German student teachers and trainee teachers of chemistry. Science Education International, 24(2), 167-194.
  6. Christensen, B.L., Johnson, R.B., & Turner L.A. (2011). Research methods, design and analysis. Boston: Pearson. Cohen L, Manion L, & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer. Corney, G. (2006). Education for sustainable development: an empirical study of the tensions and challenges faced by geography student teachers. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(3), 224-240.
  7. Cotton, D. R. E., Warren, M. F., Maiboroda, O. & Bailey, I. (2007). Sustainable development, higher education and pedagogy: a study of lectures’ beliefs and attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 13(5), 579–597.
  8. Dyment, J. E., & Hill, A. (2015). You mean I have to teach sustainability too? Initial teacher education students’ perspectives on the sustainability cross-curriculum priority. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 21-35.
  9. Eilks, I. (2015) Science education and education for sustainable development-justifications, models, practices and perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 149-158.
  10. Eroğlu, A. L. (2007). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma eğitim programı. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Strateji Geliştirme Başkanlığı Toplantı Katılımı Bilgi Notu, 06-10 Ağustos. Ank