SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

The Europeanization Process of Businessmen Organizations in Turkey

Türkiye'deki İşadamları Örgütlerinin Avrupalılaşma Süreci

Zühal Ünalp ÇEPEL
Pages
275–284
Publication Date
2015-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this paper, how liberal (Turkish Industrialists and Businessmen’s Association-TUSIAD and Economic Development Foundation-IKV), conservative (Independent Businessmen Association-MUSIAD, Association of Anatolian Businessmen-ASKON and Turkish Confederation of Businessmen and Industrialists-TUSKON) and semi-public (The Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchanges of Turkey) businessmen organizations have shaped their views on Customs Union Agreement, candidacy status of Turkey, and Economic and Social Council with the impact of Europeanization process

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The ongoing Europeanization process in candidate and member states of the European Union (EU) contributes the transformation of business organizations in national level by means of three mechanisms in principle: ‘EU funds’, ‘harmonization with the EU acquis’, and ‘social learning processes’.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since Turkey has signed Customs Union Agreement in 1995, businessmen organizations has started to be influenced from the Europeanization process before gaining the candidacy status.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this paper, how liberal (Turkish Industrialists and Businessmen’s Association-TUSIAD and Economic Development Foundation-IKV), conservative (Independent Businessmen Association-MUSIAD, Association of Anatolian Businessmen-ASKON and Turkish Confederation of Businessmen and Industrialists-TUSKON) and semi-public (The Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchanges of Turkey) businessmen organizations have shaped their views on Customs Union Agreement, candidacy status of Turkey, and Economic and Social Council with the impact of Europeanization process
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İşadamları örgütleri · Avrupalılaşma · TürkiyeAB ilişkileri

Abstract

The ongoing Europeanization process in candidate and member states of the European Union (EU) contributes the transformation of business organizations in national level by means of three mechanisms in principle: ‘EU funds’, ‘harmonization with the EU acquis’, and ‘social learning processes’. Since Turkey has signed Customs Union Agreement in 1995, businessmen organizations has started to be influenced from the Europeanization process before gaining the candidacy status. In this paper, how liberal (Turkish Industrialists and Businessmen’s Association-TUSIAD and Economic Development Foundation-IKV), conservative (Independent Businessmen Association-MUSIAD, Association of Anatolian Businessmen-ASKON and Turkish Confederation of Businessmen and Industrialists-TUSKON) and semi-public (The Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchanges of Turkey) businessmen organizations have shaped their views on Customs Union Agreement, candidacy status of Turkey, and Economic and Social Council with the impact of Europeanization process

Özet

Avrupa Birliği’ne (AB) aday ve üye ülkelerde devam etmekte olan Avrupalılaşma süreci ulusal alandaki işadamları örgütlerinin dönüşümüne temelde üç mekanizma ile katkı sağlamaktadır: ‘AB fonları’, ‘AB müktesebatına uyum’ ve ‘sosyal öğrenme süreçleri’. Türkiye’nin 1995 yılında Gümrük Birliği Antlaşması’nı imzalamasından ötürü işadamları örgütleri Avrupalılaşma sürecinden adaylık statüsü kazanılmadan önce etkilenmeye başlamıştır. Bu çalışmada liberal (Türk Sanayicileri ve İşadamları Derneği-TÜSİAD ve İktisadi Kalkınma Vakfı-İKV), muhafazakar (Müstakil İşadamları Derneği-MÜSİAD, Anadolu Aslanları İşadamları Derneği-ASKON ve Türkiye İşadamları ve Sanayiciler Konfederasyonu-TUSKON) ve yarı-kamusal (Türkiye Odalar ve Borsalar Birliği-TOBB) nitelikteki işadamları örgütlerinin Gümrük Birliği Antlaşması, Türkiye’nin aday ülke statüsü ve Ekonomik ve Sosyal Konsey’e bakış açılarının Avrupalılaşma sürecinin etkisiyle nasıl şekillendiği tartışılmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEPEL, Z. Ü. (2015). The Europeanization Process of Businessmen Organizations in Turkey. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 275–284. https://ajindex.com/articles/751996

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. AB Haber (2005), “Hisarcıklıoğlu: Gümrük Birliği yeniden tartışmaya açılsın”, http://www.abhaber.com/in- dex.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2871:h isarciklioglugumruk-birligi-yeniden-tartismaya-acilsin&c atid=211:arsiv&Itemid=924, (26.11.2013).
  2. AB Bakanlığı (2008), http://www.abgs.gov.tr/index. php?p=41774&l=1), 04.02.2015.
  3. Ahmadov, R. (2008) “Counter Transformations in the Center and Periphery of Turkish Society and the Rise of the Justice and Development Party”, Alternatives: Tur- kish Journal of International Relations, 7(2-3), ss.15-36.
  4. Arat, Y. (1991) “Politics and Big Business: Janus-Fa- ced Link to the State” Metin Heper (ed.) Strong State and Economic Interest Groups. The Post–1980
  5. Turkish Expe- rience, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, ss.135–149.
  6. ASKON (2011), Askon iktidara da muhalefete de tepkili, h t t p: / / e k o n o m i. h a b e r 7. c o m / e k o n o m i / haber/745267-askon-iktidara-da-muhalefete-de-tepkili, (02.02.2015).
  7. ASKON (2013), http://askonkonya.org.tr/kurumsal- biyografi.html, (26.11.2013).
  8. Atan, S. (2004) “Europeanisation of Turkish Peak Busi- ness Organisations and Turkey-EU Relations” Mehmet Uğur, Nergis Canefe (eds.) Turkey and European Integration. Ac- cession Prospects and Issues, London, Routledge, ss.100–121.
  9. Atasoy, Y. (2009) “Islamic Engagement with Europe- an Universalism. State Transformation in Turkey” Yıldız Atasoy (ed.) Hegemonic Transitions, the State and Crisis in Neoliberal Capitalism, Routledge, USA, Canada. Atlı, A. (2011) “Businessmen as Diplomats: The Role of Business Associations in Turkey’s Foreign Economic Policy”, Insight Turkey, 13(1), ss.109-128.
  10. Ayberk, U., Boduroğlu, E. (1989) “Turkish Interest Groups Facing the European Community”, Yapı Kredi Economic Review, 3(2), ss.125–158.
  11. Aygün, S. (2013) “MÜSİAD Brüksel ofisi- ni açtı”, http://www.binfikir.be/news/141/ARTIC- LE/8795/2013-10-04.html, (26.11.2013).
  12. Bardakçı, M. (2007) “Europeanization and Change in Domestic Politics: Impact and Mediating Factors of the Copenhagen Political Criteria in Turkish Democracy: 1999-2005”,
  13. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Almanya, Du- isburg-Essen University, Department of Political Science. Başkan, F. (2010) “The Rising Islamic Business Elite and Democratization in Turkey”, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 12(4), ss.399–416.
  14. Beyers, J., Kerremans, B. (2007) “Critical Resource De- pendencies and the Europeanization of Domestic Interest Gro- ups”, Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), ss.460-481.