SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

THE SIGNING OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY: A CASE FOR MULTILATERALISM

Nejat DOĞAN
Pages
33–57
Publication Date
2005-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, they believed this cooperation should target a long-term relationship illuminated by mutual understanding rather than quid-pro-quos driven by short-term national interests.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article demonstrates the adoption of a multilateral mindset by great powers in the aftermath of the Second World War.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It argues that after 1945 the United States, Britain, France, and Canada started to cooperate on security issues based on the basic principles of multilateralism.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, they believed this cooperation should target a long-term relationship illuminated by mutual understanding rather than quid-pro-quos driven by short-term national interests.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:International Organization · International Security · Multilateralism

Abstract

This article demonstrates the adoption of a multilateral mindset by great powers in the aftermath of the Second World War. It argues that after 1945 the United States, Britain, France, and Canada started to cooperate on security issues based on the basic principles of multilateralism. They came to believe that security is an indivisible issue and that cooperation in security issues should be based on reciprocal obligations in such a way of not to discriminate against any participant. Moreover, they believed this cooperation should target a long-term relationship illuminated by mutual understanding rather than quid-pro-quos driven by short-term national interests.

Özet

This article demonstrates the adoption of a multilateral mindset by great powers in the aftermath of the Second World War. It argues that after 1945 the United States, Britain, France, and Canada started to cooperate on security issues based on the basic principles of multilateralism. They came to believe that security is an indivisible issue and that cooperation in security issues should be based on reciprocal obligations in such a way of not to discriminate against any participant. Moreover, they believed this cooperation should target a long-term relationship illuminated by mutual understanding rather than quid-pro-quos driven by short-term national interests.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, N. (2005). THE SIGNING OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY: A CASE FOR MULTILATERALISM. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 33–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/74558

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Calleo, D. (1978). The German Problem Reconsidered. New York: Cambridge University Press. Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice. (1987). New York: United Nations, Office of Public Information. Claude, I.L.Jr. (1958). Multilateralism-Diplomatic and Otherwise. Cook, D. (1989). Forging the Alliance: NATO, 1945-1950. New York: Arbor House/William Morrow. Deporte, A.W. (1979). Europe Between the Superpowers: The Enduring Balance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  2. Deporte, A.W. (1989). The First Forty Years. S.R. Sloan (Ed.), NATO in the 1990 (pp. 43-80). Washington D.C.: Pergamon-Brassey’s. Dinan, D. (1994). Ever Closer Union?: An Introduction to the European Community. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  3. Foot, P. (1990). America and the Origins of the Atlantic Alliance: A Reappraisal. J. Smith (Ed.), The Origins of NATO (pp. 82-94). Exeter: University of Exeter Press. Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS) 1948. (1974). Volume 3, Western Europe. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office. Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS) 1949. (1975). Volume 4, Western Europe. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office. Gortemaker, M. (1994). Unifying Germany 1989-1990. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  4. Haas, E.B. (1990). When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  5. Henderson, Sir N. (1983). The Birth of NATO. Boulder: Westview Press.
  6. Ireland, T.P. (1981). Creating the Entangling Alliance: The Origins of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Westport: Greenwood Press.
  7. Keohane, R.O. (1990). Multilateralism: An Agenda for Research. International Journal, 45, 731-764.
  8. Knapp, M. (1993). Economic Aspects of the Creation of the North American-Western European Alliance System (1948-1950). N.T. Wiggershaus and R.G. Foerster (Eds.), The Western Security Community, 1948-1950: Common Problems and Conflicting National Interests During the Foundation Phase of the North Atlantic Alliance (pp. 343-373).
  9. Oxford, Providence: Berg. Larson, D.W. (1985). Origins of Containment: A Psychological Explanation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  10. Martin, L.L. (1992).
  11. Interests, Power, and Multilateralism. International Organization, 46, 765-792.
  12. NATO Handbook. (2001). Brussels: NATO Office of Information and Press. North Atlantic Treaty Organization: Facts and Figures. (1989). Brussels: NATO Information Service. Pearson, L.B. (1973). Mike: The Memoirs