Journals / Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Effects of Neural Gene Expressions on Grooming Behavior in Honey Bees

Pages
60–63
Publication Date
2020-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In researches, it was found that bees exhibit different grooming behaviors level according to species and races.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Grooming behavior, which is one of the behavioral resistance mechanisms based on the genetic basis in honeybees, is a defense response against parasitic mites, especially Varroa mite.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this respect, the right honey bee species or races can be selected and the success rate will increase.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In researches, it was found that bees exhibit different grooming behaviors level according to species and races.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Neural gene · Grooming behavior · Honey bee

Abstract

Grooming behavior, which is one of the behavioral resistance mechanisms based on the genetic basis in honeybees, is a defense response against parasitic mites, especially Varroa mite. In recent years, scientists and beekeepers have focused on bee breeding in terms of grooming behavior, because honey bees showing grooming behavior have the potential to can protect themselves against Varroa destructor. It is of great importance to determine the genes and gene regions related to this behavior before starting the breeding studies in terms of grooming behavior. In this respect, the right honey bee species or races can be selected and the success rate will increase. In researches, it was found that bees exhibit different grooming behaviors level according to species and races. Therefore, some species and races were found to be more successful than others. Especially in neural, developmental, detoxification and health-related gene expression studies, it has been shown that some gene expression is in direct proportion to the intensity of grooming behavior. While the genes responsible for grooming behavior are not known exactly, studies are underway to solve the genetic mechanism of this behavior. In this study, we reviewed the effects of neural gene expression on grooming behavior.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, B. İ., KARABAĞ, K. (2020). Effects of Neural Gene Expressions on Grooming Behavior in Honey Bees. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 60–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/745106

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Allsopp MH, de Lange WJ, Veldtman R. 2008. Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement. PloS ONE, 3:e3128. Arathi HS, Burns I, Spivak M. 2000. Ethology of hygienic behaviour in the honey bee Apis mellifera L.(Hymenoptera: Apidae): behavioural repertoire of hygienic bees. Ethology, 106(4), 365-379.
  2. Arechavaleta-Velasco ME, Alcala-Escamilla K, Robles-Rios C, Tsuruda JM, Hunt GJ. 2012. Fine-scale linkage mapping reveals a small set of candidate genes influencing honey bee grooming behavior in response to varroa mites. PLoS One 7:e47269. Aumeier P. 2001. Bioassay for grooming effectiveness towards Varroa destructor mites in Africanized and Carniolan honey Bees. Apidologie, 32, 81–90.
  3. Barradale F, Sinha K, Lebestky T. 2017. Quantification of Drosophila Grooming Behavior. JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments), (125), e55231. De Figueiró Santos J, Coelho FC, Bliman PA. 2016. Behavioral Modulation of Infestation by Varroa destructor in Bee Colonies. Implications for Colony Stability. PLoS ONE, 11(9): e0160465. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160465. Genersch E. 2010. Honey bee pathology: current threats to honey bees and beekeeping. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 87(1), 87-97. Ghazoul J. 2005a. Buzziness as usual? Questioning the global pollination crisis. Trends Ecol Evol, 20:367–373. Ghazoul J. 2005b. Response to Steffan-Dewenter et al.: questioning the global pollination crisis. Trends Ecol Evol, 20:652–653.
  4. Guzman-Novoa E, Emsen B, Unger P, Espinosa-Montan˜o, L. G, Petukhova T. 2012. Genotypic variability and relationships between mite infestation levels, mite damage, grooming intensity, and removal of Varroa destructor mites in selected strains of worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 110, 314–320. doi:10.1016/j.jip.2012.03.020. Guzman-Novoa E, Vandame R, Arechavaleta-Velasco ME. 1999. Susceptibility of European and Africanized honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) to Varroa jacobsoni Oud. in Mexico. Apidologie, 30, 173–182. doi:10.1051/apido:19990207. Hamiduzzaman MM, Emsen B, Hunt GJ, Subramanyam S, Williams CE, Tsuruda JM, Guzman Novoa E. 2017. Differential Gene Expression Associated with Honey Bee Grooming Behavior in Response to Varroa Mites. Behavioral Genetics, 47:335–344, doi:10.1007/s10519-017-9834-6.
  5. Kamikouchi A, Takeuchi H, Sawata M, Ohashi K, Natori S, Kubo T. 1998. Preferential expression of the gene for a putative inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor homologue in the mushroom bodies of the br