SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 5

A Review of Digital Phase Shifter Architectures: Operating Principles, Comparison Methodology, and Design Trade-Offs

Sena Taş(HASAN KALYONCU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4162-7585
Fırat Kaçar(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ-CERRAHPAŞA)
Pages
2859–2869
Publication Date
2026-09-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, the review does not support the existence of a universally optimal topology; rather, the most suitable solution depends on the dominant application constraint, such as accuracy, bandwidth, power, area, or scalability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Digital phase shifters are key components in modern wireless communication and sensing systems, including phased-array antennas, radar front ends, satellite terminals, and emerging mmWave/sub-THz platforms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This review systematically examines 27 papers covering a total of 30 digital phase-shifter designs and classifies them into four main categories: switch-type phase shifters (STPS), vector-sum/vector-modulator-based phase shifters (VSPS/VMPS), lattice/all-pass-network-based phase shifters, and special/other approaches such as delay-based and NEMS-related solutions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, the review does not support the existence of a universally optimal topology; rather, the most suitable solution depends on the dominant application constraint, such as accuracy, bandwidth, power, area, or scalability.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Digital phase shifters · Phased-array antennas · Beamforming

Abstract

Digital phase shifters are key components in modern wireless communication and sensing systems, including phased-array antennas, radar front ends, satellite terminals, and emerging mmWave/sub-THz platforms. However, the reported literature remains highly heterogeneous in terms of architecture, technology platform, operating frequency, and validation depth, which makes direct comparison difficult. This review systematically examines 27 papers covering a total of 30 digital phase-shifter designs and classifies them into four main categories: switch-type phase shifters (STPS), vector-sum/vector-modulator-based phase shifters (VSPS/VMPS), lattice/all-pass-network-based phase shifters, and special/other approaches such as delay-based and NEMS-related solutions. An evidence-aware comparison methodology is adopted to evaluate the reported studies using key metrics including RMS phase error, RMS amplitude error, insertion loss/gain, DC power consumption, area, operating band, and implementation technology. The comparison shows that nominal bit resolution alone is not a sufficient predictor of practical phase accuracy; instead, performance is more strongly influenced by architectural realization, parasitic-aware implementation, calibration strategy, and operating frequency. The reviewed results further indicate that passive STPS structures remain attractive for low-complexity and low-power applications, whereas vector-based architectures provide high resolution and calibration flexibility at the expense of higher power and implementation complexity. Lattice/all-pass-based structures remain relevant for wideband phase-flat operation, while delay-based approaches appear promising for sub-THz applications. Overall, the review does not support the existence of a universally optimal topology; rather, the most suitable solution depends on the dominant application constraint, such as accuracy, bandwidth, power, area, or scalability. The taxonomy, comparison framework, and cross-comparison presented in this work are intended to support more consistent evaluation and more informed topology selection in future digital phase-shifter research.

Özet

Digital phase shifters are key components in modern wireless communication and sensing systems, including phased-array antennas, radar front ends, satellite terminals, and emerging mmWave/sub-THz platforms. However, the reported literature remains highly heterogeneous in terms of architecture, technology platform, operating frequency, and validation depth, which makes direct comparison difficult. This review systematically examines 27 papers covering a total of 30 digital phase-shifter designs and classifies them into four main categories: switch-type phase shifters (STPS), vector-sum/vector-modulator-based phase shifters (VSPS/VMPS), lattice/all-pass-network-based phase shifters, and special/other approaches such as delay-based and NEMS-related solutions. An evidence-aware comparison methodology is adopted to evaluate the reported studies using key metrics including RMS phase error, RMS amplitude error, insertion loss/gain, DC power consumption, area, operating band, and implementation technology. The comparison shows that nominal bit resolution alone is not a sufficient predictor of practical phase accuracy; instead, performance is more strongly influenced by architectural realization, parasitic-aware implementation, calibration strategy, and operating frequency. The reviewed results further indicate that passive STPS structures remain attractive for low-complexity and low-power applications, whereas vector-based architectures provide high resolution and calibration flexibility at the expense of higher power and implementation complexity. Lattice/all-pass-based structures remain relevant for wideband phase-flat operation, while delay-based approaches appear promising for sub-THz applications. Overall, the review does not support the existence of a universally optimal topology; rather, the most suitable solution depends on the dominant application constraint, such as accuracy, bandwidth, power, area, or scalability. The taxonomy, comparison framework, and cross-comparison presented in this work are intended to support more consistent evaluation and more informed topology selection in future digital phase-shifter research.

🔖

Cite This Article

Taş, S., Kaçar, F. (2026). A Review of Digital Phase Shifter Architectures: Operating Principles, Comparison Methodology, and Design Trade-Offs. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 5, 2859–2869. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1945963

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (37)

  1. Anjos, E. V., Schreurs, D. M. P., Vandenbosch, G. A., & Geurts, M. (2020). A 14–50-GHz phase shifter with all-pass networks for 5G mobile applications. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 68(2), 762–774. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2019.2948852
  2. Avci, C., Gunes, E. O., & Yarman, B. S. (2019). A symmetric lattice-based wideband wide phase range digital phase shifter topology. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, 47(8), 1269–1292. https://doi.org/10.1002/cta.2639
  3. Brilhante, D. D. S., Manjarres, J. C., Moreira, R., de Oliveira Veiga, L., de Rezende, J. F., Müller, F.,. & de Figueiredo, F. A. P. (2023). A literature survey on AI-aided beamforming and beam management for 5G and 6G systems. Sensors, 23(9), Article 4359. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23094359
  4. Chiu, H. C., Chen, C. M., Chang, L. C., & Kao, H. L. (2021). A 5-bit X-band GaN HEMT-based phase shifter. Electronics, 10(6), Article 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10060658
  5. Cho, J., Lee, J. H., & Kim, M. (2025). The design of a 140 GHz 28 nm CMOS vector-sum phase shifter based on Gilbert cell and current-steering amplifiers. Chips, 4(4), Article 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/chips4040050
  6. Coviello, G., Avitabile, G., Piccinni, G., D’Amato, G., & Talarico, C. (2016). Effects on phased arrays radiation pattern due to phase error distribution in the phase shifter operation. MATEC Web of Conferences, 76, Article 03002. EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20167603002
  7. Gharsalli, S., Aloui, R., Mhatli, S., Corona-Chavez, A., Brito-Brito, Z., Mishra, S. K., & Llamas-Garro, I. (2026). Comprehensive phase shifter review: State of the art and future trends. Progress in Electromagnetics Research B, 116. https://doi.org/10.2528/PIERB25082704
  8. Ghorbani, F. (2025). Highly linear and fast phase shifting technology [Doctoral dissertation, University of Liverpool].
  9. Hamidi, E. A. Z., Arifin, A. I., Soedarsono, S., & Siddiq, S. F. (2019). Design and implementation of planar phase shifter for radar at frequency 2.9 GHz–3.1 GHz as beam-steering. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1402(3), Article 033091. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/3/033091
  10. Jiang, H., Zhao, Z., Zhu, N., & Meng, F. (2025). Design and analysis of an ultra-wideband high-precision active phase shifter in 0.18 μm SiGe BiCMOS technology. Journal of Low Power Electronics and Applications, 15(2), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/jlpea15020030
  11. Kebe, M., Yagoub, M. C. E., & Amaya, R. E. (2025). A survey of phase shifters for microwave phased array systems. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, 53(6), 3719–3739. https://doi.org/10.1002/cta.4298
  12. Khazaei, M., Armaki, S. H. M., & Amin, A. S. N. (2025). Proposing a modified switchable Schiffman structure to implement a wideband and low-loss 4-bit digital phase shifter. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3615716
  13. Kilinc, M., Kacar, F., Ormanci, M. A., & Kilinc, S. (2026). Design of a 5-bit CMOS phase shifter with tunable active inductors for 5G applications in S-band. IEICE Electronics Express, 23(4), Article 20250631. https://doi.org/10.1587/elex.22.20250631
  14. Lee, J. S., Chang, W. J., Jang, K. H., & Jang, T. H. (2026). A 6-bit digitally controlled vector-sum phase shifter with current steering architecture. IDEC Journal of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 12(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.23075/jicas.2026.12.1.008
  15. Li, X., Fu, H., Ma, K., & Hu, J. (2022). A 2.4–4-GHz wideband 7-bit phase shifter with low RMS phase/amplitude error in 0.5-μm GaAs technology. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 70(2), 1292–1301. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2021.3123053
  16. Lin, Q., Xu, J., Chen, K., Wang, L., Li, W., Yu, Z.,. & Hong, W. (2024). A single-board integrated millimeter-wave asymmetric full-digital beamforming array for B5G/6G applications. Engineering, 41, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2024.04.013
  17. Lin, W. P., & Lin, C. Y. (2025). 4 × 4 active antenna array with digital phase shifting for WiFi 6E applications. Electronics, 14(19), Article 3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14193772
  18. Lin, Y. H., & Tsai, Z. M. (2022). Topology selection of switch-type phase shifter units for wideband Ka-band 5-bit phase shifter with low RMS errors. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 64(2), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.33083
  19. Luo, L., Li, Z., Yao, Y., & Cheng, G. (2019). A 6–18 GHz 6-bit active phase shifter in 0.13-µm SiGe BiCMOS. IEICE Electronics Express, 16(10), Article 20190233. https://doi.org/10.1587/elex.16.20190233
  20. Mailloux, R. J. (2017). Phased array antenna handbook. Artech House.
  21. Minnella, A. D., Papotto, G., Finocchiaro, A., Parisi, A., Castorina, A., & Palmisano, G. (2025). A 39 GHz phase shifter in 28 nm FD-SOI CMOS technology for mm-wave wireless communications. Electronics, 14(22), Article 4433. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14224433
  22. Shangguan, Y., Quan, H., Wen, W., & Liang, Y. (2024). An 8–18 GHz 6-bit phase shifter with balance-compensated balun. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2849(1), Article 012022. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2849/1/012022
  23. Shen, H., Zhang, H., Pu, Y., Wang, C., Li, B., Tang, X.,. & Luo, J. (2025). A 90–100 GHz SiGe BiCMOS 6-bit digital phase shifter with a coupler-based 180° unit for phased arrays. Micromachines, 16(9), Article 1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16091056
  24. Sindhuja, N. M., Kanthamani, S., Anbalagan, A., & Ramalakshmi, P. (2025). Meshfree method-based modeling of distributed nanotransmission line phase shifter for 5G wireless applications. International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, 2025(1), Article 8823750. https://doi.org/10.1155/mmce/8823750
  25. Song, J. H., Lee, E. G., Lee, J. E., Son, J. T., Kim, J. H., Baek, M. S., & Kim, C. Y. (2023). A 37–40 GHz 6-bits switched-filter phase shifter using 150 nm GaN HEMT. Nanomaterials, 13(20), Article 2752. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13202752
  26. Taş, S., & Kaçar, F. (2025). Design and simulation of a wideband 3-bit phase shifter for 4.5–5.5 GHz applications. IET Circuits, Devices & Systems, 2025(1), Article 5377138. https://doi.org/10.1049/cds2/5377138
  27. Tu, H. J., Chen, H. C., Chen, P. H., & Huang, P. Y. (2025). A 7-bit vector-sum phase shifter for LEO satellite communication in 90-nm CMOS process. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3591240
  28. Uchino, T., Yamazaki, Y., Tian, A., Liu, C., Park, S., Shehata, A.,. & Okada, K. (2025). A compact D-band phase shifter with 0.1-degree phase resolution and ultra-low phase error in 65-nm CMOS. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSSC.2025.3577051
  29. Wei, Y., Wang, Z., Huang, Z., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2026). A 2-to-18-GHz 6-bit vector-sum phase shifter with tunable operating band. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/cta.70329
  30. Wu, T., Zhang, X., Xing, Z., Zhao, C., Yu, Y., & Liu, H. (2021). A 21.5–25 GHz 7-bit phase shifter with passive vector-sum topology. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 63(6), 1652–1656. https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.32783
  31. Xiong, Y., Zeng, X., & Li, J. (2020). A frequency-reconfigurable CMOS active phase shifter for 5G mm-wave applications. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 67(10), 1824–1828. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2019.2958665
  32. Zeng, J., Xie, C., Zhang, D., Feng, J., Tan, C., & Yu, Z. (2023). A wideband accurate compact 6-bit phase shifter in 0.15-μm GaAs technology. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 65(2), 534–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.33535
  33. Zhan, H., Zhang, T., & Pei, X. (2024). Design of 2.5–3.3 GHz high-precision compact digital phase shifter. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2807(1), Article 012004. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2807/1/012004
  34. Brilhante, D. D. S., Manjarres, J. C., Moreira, R., de Oliveira Veiga, L., de Rezende, J. F., Müller, F.,. & de Figueiredo, F. A. P. (2023). A literature survey on AI-aided beamforming and beam management for 5G and 6G systems. Sensors, 23(9), Article 4359. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23094359
  35. Lin, Q., Xu, J., Chen, K., Wang, L., Li, W., Yu, Z.,. & Hong, W. (2024). A single-board integrated millimeter-wave asymmetric full-digital beamforming array for B5G/6G applications. Engineering, 41, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2024.04.013
  36. Shen, H., Zhang, H., Pu, Y., Wang, C., Li, B., Tang, X.,. & Luo, J. (2025). A 90–100 GHz SiGe BiCMOS 6-bit digital phase shifter with a coupler-based 180° unit for phased arrays. Micromachines, 16(9), Article 1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16091056
  37. Uchino, T., Yamazaki, Y., Tian, A., Liu, C., Park, S., Shehata, A.,. & Okada, K. (2025). A compact D-band phase shifter with 0.1-degree phase resolution and ultra-low phase error in 65-nm CMOS. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSSC.2025.3577051