SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

TRANSLATION EVALUATION OF INTERTEXTUAL REFERENCES IN A PLAY OF LITERARY VALUE

BİR TİYATRO METNİNDEKİ METİNLERARASI GÖNDERGELERİN EDEBİ DEĞER BAKIMINDAN ÇEVİRİ DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

Mesut KULELİ
Pages
23–45
Publication Date
2018-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Translation evaluation of those contexts showed that while intertextuality was preserved in half of the contexts, designificative tendencies were also determined in the other half, with over-interpretation of the meaning becoming the most frequently used tendency.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to analyze intertextual references in the original play Coriolanus by Shakespeare and evaluate two Turkish translations of those contexts with intertextual references.Intertextual references are one of the steps of semiological analysis of original texts prior to the act of translation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the semiological analysis of the play, 16 contexts were found to feature intertextual references.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Translation evaluation of those contexts showed that while intertextuality was preserved in half of the contexts, designificative tendencies were also determined in the other half, with over-interpretation of the meaning becoming the most frequently used tendency.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çeviri göstergebilimi · metinlerarasılık · zorunlu metinlerarasılık

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze intertextual references in the original play Coriolanus by Shakespeare and evaluate two Turkish translations of those contexts with intertextual references.Intertextual references are one of the steps of semiological analysis of original texts prior to the act of translation. It is a well-known fact that Shakespeare benefited from Greek and Roman mythologies besides iconographic and historic references, without the analysis of which transferring a Shakespearean work into another culture might lead to losses in signification of the text. As a result of the semiological analysis of the play, 16 contexts were found to feature intertextual references. All those contexts were determined as obligatory intertextuality. Translation evaluation of those contexts showed that while intertextuality was preserved in half of the contexts, designificative tendencies were also determined in the other half, with over-interpretation of the meaning becoming the most frequently used tendency.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Shakespeare’in Coriolanus oyunundaki metinlerarası göndergeleri çözümlemek ve metinlerarası göndergeler saptanan söylemlerin iki Türkçe çevirisini değerlendirmektir. Metindeki metinlerarasılık ilişkileri, çeviri ediminden önce özgün metin çözümlenmesi için uygulanabilecek adımlardan biridir. Shakespeare’in eserlerinde ikonokrafik ve tarihsel göndergelerin yanı sıra Yunan ve Roma mitolojisinden yararlandığı bilinmektedir. Bu göndergeler yoluyla kurulan metinlerarasılık ilişkilerini çözümlemeden bir Shakespeare metnini başka bir kültüre aktarmak metnin alımlanmasında kayıplara neden olabilmektedir. Oyunun göstergebilimsel çözümlemesi sonucunda, 16 söylemde metinlerarasılık göndergeler saptanmıştır. Bu söylemlerin tümü, zorunlu metinlerarasılık olarak bulunmuştur. Bu söylemlerin çeviri değerlendirmesine göre söylemlerin yarısında metinlerarasılık ilişkileri korunabilmişken, diğer yarısında anlam bozucu eğilimler saptanmıştır. En sık kullanılan anlam bozucu eğilimin, anlamın aşırı yorumlanması olduğu saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KULELİ, M. (2018). TRANSLATION EVALUATION OF INTERTEXTUAL REFERENCES IN A PLAY OF LITERARY VALUE. Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 23–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/740341

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aktulum, K. (2011) “Metinlerarasılık // Göstergelerarasılık”, Ankara:
  2. Kanguru Yayınları.
  3. Apperson, G. and Manser, M. (2007) “Dictionary of Proverbs”, London: Wordsworth Editions. Bölükbasi, O. (2018) “Galen’s Neurology”, http://www.academia.edu/27975999/Galenin_N%C3%B6rolojisi_Galens_Neurology, (24.01. 2018.).
  4. Bulfinch, T. (2017) “Bulfinch’s Mythology: The Complete Texts”, Toronto: Aegitas. French, R. (2002) “Harvey, Clinical Medicine and the College of Physicians”, Clinical Medicine, 2(6): 584-590. Gorlée, D. (1994) “Semiotics and the Problem of Translation: With Special Reference to the Semiotics of Charles S. Peirce”, Amsterdam: Rodopi. Gorlée, D. (2012) “Wittgenstein in Translation: Exploring Semiotic Signatures”, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Grant, M. (2011) “Myths of the Greeks and Romans”, London: Hachette UK. Graves, R (2017) “The Greek Myths: The Complete and Definitive Edition”, London: Penguin UK. Hale, D. (1968) “Intestine Sedition: The Fable of the Belly”, Comparative Literature Studies, 5(4): 377-388.
  5. Hamilton, E. (2017) “Mythology: Timeless Tales of Gods and Heroes”, New York: Hachette Book Group. Hansen, W. and HANSEN, W. F. (2005) “Classical Mythology: A Guide to the Mythical World of the Greeks and Romans”, New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Kraeling, E. (1947) “Xisouthros, Deucalion and the Flood Traditions”, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 67(3): 177-183.
  7. Kuleli, M. and Ural, G. (2015) “Gösterge Çözüm Yöntemi ile William Shakespeare’in Merchant of Venice Eserinde Mitolojik ve İkonografik Göndergelerin Saptanması ve Türkçe Çevirilerinin Değerlendirilmesi”, Uluslararası Dil ve Edebiyat Eğitimi Dergisi, 13(1): 1-24.
  8. Leeming, D. (2005) “The Oxford Companion to World Mythology”, New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Ludskanov, A. (1975) “A Semiotic Approach to the Theory of Translation”, Language Sciences, 35: 5-8.
  10. Murnaghan, S. (2009) “Penelope’s Agnoia: Knowledge, Power and Gender in the Odyssey”, Homer’s Odyssey, (ed). Doherty, L, New York: Oxford University Press: 231-246.
  11. Nagy, G. (1992) “Greek Mythology and Poetics”, London: Vornell University Press.
  12. Nowotna, M. (2005) “Le Sujet Dans Tous Ses Etas”, D’une Langue à L’autre, (ed.) Nowotna, M, Paris: Aux Lieux D’etre: 23-46.
  13. Öztürk Kasar, S. (2001) “La Sémiotique Subjectale et la Traduction”, Third International Congress- Claims, Changes and Challenges in Translation Studies Abstracts, European Society for Translation Copenhagen Business School-Copenhagen. Öztürk Kasar, S. (2009a