Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

TESTING THE THREE FACTOR MODEL OF FAMA AND FRENCH: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY

Pages
79–92
Publication Date
2008-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In other words, the Model could not capture the variation in common stock returns totally.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The 3 Factor Model, used for explaining the variation in common stock returns has added a fresh insight into asset pricing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to investigate whether the 3 Factor Model could capture the variation in common stock returns of firms quoted to ISE or not, by using a data set including firms from the financial sector, for a longer time period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In other words, the Model could not capture the variation in common stock returns totally.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:3 Faktör Modeli · İMKB · Hisse Senedi Getirileri

Abstract

The 3 Factor Model, used for explaining the variation in common stock returns has added a fresh insight into asset pricing. The explanatory power of the Model has been tested by employing data of firms from various sectors, countries and regions. The Model has been tested using data of the firms quoted to Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE), too. But the findings were conflicting. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the 3 Factor Model could capture the variation in common stock returns of firms quoted to ISE or not, by using a data set including firms from the financial sector, for a longer time period. Considering the findings, it would be possible to emphasize that even though the 3 Factor Model could explain most of the variation in common stock returns over the period July of 1993 to June of 2004, there might be still some missing factors in the Model. In other words, the Model could not capture the variation in common stock returns totally.

Özet

Hisse senedi getirilerindeki varyasyonu açıklamakta kullanılan 3 Faktör Modeli, varlık fiyatlamaya yeni bir boyut getirmiştir. Modelin getiriler üzerindeki açıklayıcı gücü farklı ülke ve bölgelerdeki çeşitli sektörlerde yer alan firmalara ait veriler kullanılarak test edilmiştir. Model, İMKB’de işlem gören firmalara ait veriler kullanılarak da test edilmiştir fakat elde edilen bulgular çelişki içerisindedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı ise 3 Faktör Modeli’nin, İMKB’de işlem gören hisse senetlerinin getirilerindeki varyasyonu açıklayıp açıklayamadığını, Finansal sektörde yer alan firmaları da örnek gruba dahil ederek, daha uzun bir süre için incelemektir. Bulgulara bakıldığı zaman, her ne kadar 3 Faktör Modeli’nin 1993 yılı Temmuz ayı ile 2004 yılı Haziran ayı arasındaki dönemde İMKB işlem gören firmaların hisse senetlerinin getirilerindeki varyasyonu büyük ölçüde açıklayabildiği söylenebilecek olsa da, Model’de eksik olan bazı faktörlerin var olabileceği de belirtilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANBAŞ, P. D. S., ARIOĞLU, A. G. E. (2008). TESTING THE THREE FACTOR MODEL OF FAMA AND FRENCH: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 79–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/73888

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ajili, S., (2002), “The Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Three Factor Model of Fama and French Revisited in the Case of France”, CEREG University of Paris Working Paper, no. 2002-10.
  2. Ajili, S., (2003), “Explaining the Cross-Section Returns in France: Characteristics or Covariances”, CEREG University of Paris Working Paper. Aksu, M. H., T. Onder, (2003), “The Size and Book-to-Market Effects and Their Role as Risk Proxies in the Istanbul Stock Exchange, Koc University Graduate School of Business Working Paper, no. 2000-04.
  3. Alford, A., J.J. Jones, M. E. Zmijewski, (1994), “Extensions and Violations of the SEC Statutory Form 10-K Filing Date”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, no. 1-2: 229-254.
  4. Allen, D.E., F. Cleary., (1998), “Determinants of the Cross-Section of Stock Returns in the Malaysian Stock Market”, International Review of Financial Analysis 7, no. 3: 253-275.
  5. Annert, J., J. Crombez, B. Spinel, F. Van Holle, (2002), “Value and Size Effect: Now You See It, Now You Don’t”, Universiteit Gent Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde Working Paper, no. 2002-146.
  6. Bahl, B, (2006), “Testing the Fama and French Three-Factor Model and Its Variations for the Indian Stock Returns”, SSRN Working Pares Series Working Paper. Bartholdy, J., P. Peare, (2005), “Estimation of Expected Return: CAPM vs. Fama and French”, International Review of Financial Analysis, no. 14: 407-427.
  7. Bilinski, P., D. Lyssimachou, (2004), “Validating The Fama & French Three Factor Model; The Case of the Stockholm Stock Exchange 1982 – 2002”, Goteborg University School of Economics and Commercial Law Industrial and Financial Economics Master Thesis, Goteborg. Bundoo, S. K, (2006), “An Augmented Fama and French Three-Factor Model: New Evidence from an Emerging Stock Market”, Working Paper. Charitou, A., E. Constantinidis, (2004), “Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Stock Returns: Emprical Evidence for Japan”, University of Cyprus Working Paper. Chou, P., W. Li, G. Zhou, (2004), “Portfolio Optimization Under Asset Pricing Anomalies”, Japan and the World Economy 18, no. 2: 121-142.
  8. Connor, G., S. Sehgal, (2001), “Tests of the Fama and French Model in India”, Working Paper. Curuk, T, (2001), “An Analysis of Factors Influencing Accounting Disclosure in Turkey”, Istanbul Stock Exchange Publications, Istanbul. Daniel, K., S. Titman, (1997), “Evidence on the Characteristics of Cross Sectional Variation in Stock Returns”, The Journal of Finance 52, no. 1: 1-33.
  9. Daniel, K., S. Titman,