Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

Geçiş Ekonomilerinde Liberalleşmenin Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerinde Etkisi

GEÇİŞ EKONOMİLERİNDE LİBERALLEŞMENİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDE ETKİSİ

Pages
309–322
Publication Date
2012-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The present study investigates the effects of market oriented structural reforms government budget deficits international trade improvements and political constraints on growth in 25 transition countries after the break up of the socialist block and collapse of the centrally planned economic system Using panel data for the period 1994 2008 growth determinants of transition countries are examined Estimation results suggest that realization of market oriented structural reforms and reducing budget deficit have positive effects on growth performance of transition countries The initial effect of liberalization reforms is found negative but subsequent and cumulative effect of market oriented reforms is found positive Aditionally according to the test results the integration of transition countries to the world economy has positive growth effects Finally the results do not provide any argument that supporting the effect of political rights restrictions on economic growth Key Words: Transition Economies Economic Growth Liberalization Reforms Panel Data Methods

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study investigates the effects of market oriented structural reforms government budget deficits international trade improvements and political constraints on growth in 25 transition countries after the break up of the socialist block and collapse of the centrally planned economic system Using panel data for the period 1994 2008 growth determinants of transition countries are examined Estimation results suggest that realization of market oriented structural reforms and reducing budget deficit have positive effects on growth performance of transition countries The initial effect of liberalization reforms is found negative but subsequent and cumulative effect of market oriented reforms is found positive Aditionally according to the test results the integration of transition countries to the world economy has positive growth effects Finally the results do not provide any argument that supporting the effect of political rights restrictions on economic growth Key Words: Transition Economies Economic Growth Liberalization Reforms Panel Data Methods
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study investigates the effects of market oriented structural reforms government budget deficits international trade improvements and political constraints on growth in 25 transition countries after the break up of the socialist block and collapse of the centrally planned economic system Using panel data for the period 1994 2008 growth determinants of transition countries are examined Estimation results suggest that realization of market oriented structural reforms and reducing budget deficit have positive effects on growth performance of transition countries The initial effect of liberalization reforms is found negative but subsequent and cumulative effect of market oriented reforms is found positive Aditionally according to the test results the integration of transition countries to the world economy has positive growth effects Finally the results do not provide any argument that supporting the effect of political rights restrictions on economic growth Key Words: Transition Economies Economic Growth Liberalization Reforms Panel Data Methods
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The present study investigates the effects of market oriented structural reforms government budget deficits international trade improvements and political constraints on growth in 25 transition countries after the break up of the socialist block and collapse of the centrally planned economic system Using panel data for the period 1994 2008 growth determinants of transition countries are examined Estimation results suggest that realization of market oriented structural reforms and reducing budget deficit have positive effects on growth performance of transition countries The initial effect of liberalization reforms is found negative but subsequent and cumulative effect of market oriented reforms is found positive Aditionally according to the test results the integration of transition countries to the world economy has positive growth effects Finally the results do not provide any argument that supporting the effect of political rights restrictions on economic growth Key Words: Transition Economies Economic Growth Liberalization Reforms Panel Data Methods
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Geçiş Ekonomileri · Ekonomik Büyüme · Liberalleşme Reformları

Abstract

The present study investigates the effects of market oriented structural reforms government budget deficits international trade improvements and political constraints on growth in 25 transition countries after the break up of the socialist block and collapse of the centrally planned economic system Using panel data for the period 1994 2008 growth determinants of transition countries are examined Estimation results suggest that realization of market oriented structural reforms and reducing budget deficit have positive effects on growth performance of transition countries The initial effect of liberalization reforms is found negative but subsequent and cumulative effect of market oriented reforms is found positive Aditionally according to the test results the integration of transition countries to the world economy has positive growth effects Finally the results do not provide any argument that supporting the effect of political rights restrictions on economic growth Key Words: Transition Economies Economic Growth Liberalization Reforms Panel Data Methods

Özet

Bu çalışmada, 25 geçiş ekonomisinde Sosyalist bloğunun dağılmasından sonra piyasa ekonomisine yönelik liberalleşme reformlarının, bütçe açıklarının, dış ticaret gelişmelerinin ve siyasi kısıtlamaların ekonomik büyüme etkileri incelenmiştir. Büyüme analizi 1994-2008 yıllarına ait veri seti ve panel veri yöntemleri kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Kullanılan yöntemler kapsamında elde edilen bulgulara göre, geçiş ekonomilerinde piyasa ekonomisine yönelik gerçekleştirilen yapısal dönüşüm reformları ve bütçe açıklarının azaltılması ekonomik büyümeyi artırıcı etki etmiştir. Liberalleşme reformlarının büyüme üzerindeki başlangıç etkisi negatif, sonraki ve nihai etkisi pozitiftir. Bununla birlikte, araştırmaya konu olan ülkelerin uluslararası topluma entegrasyonu da büyümeyi olumlu yönde etkilemiştir. Siyasi haklar üzerindeki kısıtlamaların ise büyüme üzerinde herhangi bir etkisi tespit edilememiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AĞAYEV, Y. D. D. S. (2012). Geçiş Ekonomilerinde Liberalleşmenin Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerinde Etkisi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 309–322. https://ajindex.com/articles/73602

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abed, G. T. ve Davoodi, H. R. (2000), “Corruption, Structural Reforms, and Economic Performance in the Transition Economies”, IMF Working Paper, WP/00/132. Ağayev, S., Yamak, N. (2009), “Bağımsız Devletler Topluluğu Ülkelerinde Ekonomik Büyümenin Belirleyicileri”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 23, Sayı: 4, s.179-204.
  2. Aslund, A., Boone, P. ve Johnson, S. (1996), “How to Stabilize: Lessons from Post-communist Countries”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, s.217-291.
  3. Aslund, A. ve Jenish, N. (2005), “The Eurasian Growth Paradox”, Institute for International Economics Working Paper, 06-5.
  4. Awokuse, O. T. (2007), “Causality between Exports, Imports, and Economic Growth: Evidence from Transition Economies”, Economics Letters, 94, s.389-395.
  5. Baltagi, B. H. (2005),
  6. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, England. Barlow, D. (2006), “Growth in Transition Economies: A Trade Policy Perspective”, Economics of Transition, Vol. 14, No. 3, s.505-515.
  7. Berengaut, J. ve Woytek, K. E. (2005), “Who is Still Haunted by the Specter of Communism? Explaining Relative Output Contractions under Transition”, IMF Working Paper, WP/05/68. Berg, A., Borensztein, E., Sahay, R. ve Zettelmeyer, J. (1999), “The Evolution of Output in Transition Economies: Explaining the Differences”, IMF Working Paper, WP/99/73. Christoffersen, P. ve Doyle, P. (1998), “From Inflation to Growth: Eight Years of Transition”, IMF Working Paper, WP/98/100. Chubrik, A. (2003), “Market Reforms and Economic Growth in Post-Communist Economies: A Panel Data Approach”, Web: http://pdc.ceu.hu/archive/ 00002188/01/ReformsandGrowth.pdf. Dawson, P. J. (2003), “Financial Development and Growth in Economies in Transition”, Applied Economics Letters, 10, s.833-836.
  8. Değer, M. K. ve Emsen, Ö. S. (2006), “Geçiş Ekonomilerinde Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları ve Ekonomik Büyüme Ġlişkileri: Panel Veri Analizleri (1990-2002)”, C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt 7, Sayı 2, s.121-137.
  9. De Macedo, J. B. ve Martins, O. J. (2006), “Growth, Reform Indicators and Policy Complementarities”, FEUNL Working Papers, No. 484. De Melo, M., Denizer, C. ve Gelb, A. (1996), “From Plan to Market: Patterns of Transition”, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 1564. De Melo, M., Denizer, C., Gelb, A. ve Tenev, S. (1997), “Circumstance and Choice: The Role of Initial Conditions and Policies in Transition Economies”, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 1866. Denizer, C.