In this study determining the role of abusive supervision on using impression management tactics is aimed The research is conducted with currently working employess in the private sector firms via survey method In the study abusive supervision scale which is developed by Tepper 2000 and impression management scale developed by Bolino and Turnley 1999 are used Exploratory factor analysis confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling are used Results revealed that abusive supervision is positively correlated with self promotion ingratiation intimidation exemplification and supplication Key Words: Abusive supervision impression managemetn structural equation modelling
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study determining the role of abusive supervision on using impression management tactics is aimed The research is conducted with currently working employess in the private sector firms via survey method In the study abusive supervision scale which is developed by Tepper 2000 and impression management scale developed by Bolino and Turnley 1999 are used Exploratory factor analysis confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling are used Results revealed that abusive supervision is positively correlated with self promotion ingratiation intimidation exemplification and supplication Key Words: Abusive supervision impression managemetn structural equation modelling
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study determining the role of abusive supervision on using impression management tactics is aimed The research is conducted with currently working employess in the private sector firms via survey method In the study abusive supervision scale which is developed by Tepper 2000 and impression management scale developed by Bolino and Turnley 1999 are used Exploratory factor analysis confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling are used Results revealed that abusive supervision is positively correlated with self promotion ingratiation intimidation exemplification and supplication Key Words: Abusive supervision impression managemetn structural equation modelling
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study determining the role of abusive supervision on using impression management tactics is aimed The research is conducted with currently working employess in the private sector firms via survey method In the study abusive supervision scale which is developed by Tepper 2000 and impression management scale developed by Bolino and Turnley 1999 are used Exploratory factor analysis confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling are used Results revealed that abusive supervision is positively correlated with self promotion ingratiation intimidation exemplification and supplication Key Words: Abusive supervision impression managemetn structural equation modelling
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İstismarcı yönetim izlenim yönetimi yapısal eşitlik modellemesi · Abusive supervision · impression managemetn
Abstract
In this study determining the role of abusive supervision on using impression management tactics is aimed The research is conducted with currently working employess in the private sector firms via survey method In the study abusive supervision scale which is developed by Tepper 2000 and impression management scale developed by Bolino and Turnley 1999 are used Exploratory factor analysis confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling are used Results revealed that abusive supervision is positively correlated with self promotion ingratiation intimidation exemplification and supplication Key Words: Abusive supervision impression managemetn structural equation modelling
Özet
Bu çalışmada izlenim yönetimi taktiklerinin kullanımında istismarcı yönetimin rolünün belirlenmesi amaçlanmaktadır Araştırma Adana ilindeki özel sektör işletmelerinde çalışma yaşamını faal olarak sürdüren çalışanlar ile anket yöntemiyle yapılmıştır Çalışmada Tepper 2000 tarafından geliştirilen istismarcı yönetim abusive supervision ölçeği ile Bolino ve Turnley’nin 1999 izlenim yönetimi ölçeği kullanılmıştır Verilerin analizinde açımlayıcı faktör analizi doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve yapısal eşitlik modellemesi kullanılmıştır Araştırma sonucunda istismarcı yönetim ile kişisel reklam yağcılık gözdağı verme örnek olma ve kendini acındırma boyutları arasında pozitif yönlü ilişkiler ortaya çıkmıştır
ÜLBEĞİ, A. İ. D., ÖZGEN, Y. H. M., ÖZGEN, H. M., ÖZGEN, P. H. (2013). Örgütsel Ortamda İstismarci Yönetim Ve izlenim Yönetimi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/73538
Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y. ve Debrah, Y. A. (2007). “Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 191-201.
Bolino, M.C. ve Turnley, W.H. (1999). “Measuring Impression Management in Organizations: A Sale Development Based on the Jones and Pittman Taxonomy”, Organizational Research Methods, 2, 187-206.
Bolino, M.C., ve Turnley, W.H. (2003). “Going the extra mile: Cultivating and managing employee citizenship behavior”, Academy of Management Executive,17, 60-72.
Bolino, M.C., Varela, J.A., Bande, B., ve Turnley, W.H. (2006). “The impact of impression management tactics on supervisor ratings of organizational citizenship behavior”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 281-297.
Bozeman, D. P. ve Kacmar, M. (1997). “A cybernetic model of impression management processes in organizations”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(1): 9-30.
Harvey, P., Stoner, J., Hochwarter, W. ve Kacmar, C. (2007). “Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes”, The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 264-280.
Higgins, C. A., Judge, T. A. ve Ferris, G. R. (2003). “Influence tactics and work outcomes: a meta-analysis”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 89–106.
Jones, E. E. ve Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic selfpresentation. İçinde J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (s. 231261). Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. Leary, M. R. ve Kowalski, R. M. (1990). “Impression management: A literature review and two componenet model”, Psychological Bulletin, 10, 34-47.
Mitchell, M. S. ve Ambrose, M. L. (2007). “Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159 – 1168. Nelson, D. L. ve Quick, J. C. (2003). Organizational behavior. South-Western, Mason, OH. Neuman, J. H., Baron, R. A. (1997). Aggression in the workplace”. İçinde R. Giacalone and J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations. (s. 37-67).
Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. Özdevecioğlu, M. ve Erdem, S. (2008). “İzlenim yönetimi davranışı: Örgütsel açıdan teorik çerçeve”. İçinde Özdevecioğlu, M. Ve Karadal, H. (ed), Örgütsel davranışta seçme konular, İlke Yayınevi,
Ankara.
Scheurer, M. L. (2010). “A Climate for Workplace Aggression: The Influence of Abusive Supervision, Organizational Factors, and Subordinate Predispositi